Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

J. Salberg (ed.): Good Enough Endings: Breaks, Interruptions, and Terminations from Contemporary Relational Perspectives (2010)

Routledge, New York, 303 pp, $35.95

  • Book Review
  • Published:
Clinical Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bass, A. (2010). “It ain’t over till it’s over”: Infinite conversations, imperfect endings, and the elusive nature of termination. In J. Salberg (Ed.), Good enough endings: Breaks, interruptions, and terminations from contemporary relational perspectives (pp. 277–303). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, S. (2010). The changing firmament: Familiar and unfamiliar forms of engagement during termination. In J. Salberg (Ed.), Good enough endings: Breaks, interruptions, and terminations from contemporary relational perspectives (pp. 145–166). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. (2010). Transformations of desire and despair: Reflections on the termination process from a relational perspective. In J. Salberg (Ed.), Good enough endings: Breaks, interruptions, and terminations from contemporary relational perspectives (pp. 83–106). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glennon, S. (2010). Relational analyses: Are they more difficult to end. In J. Salberg (Ed.), Good enough endings: Breaks, interruptions, and terminations from contemporary relational perspectives (pp. 257–276). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, D. (2010). Parting ways. In J. Salberg (Ed.), Good enough endings: Breaks, interruptions, and terminations from contemporary relational perspectives (pp. 241–256). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grand, S. (2010). Termination as necessary madness. In J. Salberg (Ed.), Good enough endings: Breaks, interruptions, and terminations from contemporary relational perspectives (pp. 131–144). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layton, L. (2010). Maternal resistance. In J. Salberg (Ed.), Good enough endings: Breaks, interruptions, and terminations from contemporary relational perspectives (pp. 191–210). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, B. (2010). Afterwardness and termination. In J. Salberg (Ed.), Good enough endings: Breaks, interruptions, and terminations from contemporary relational perspectives (pp. 213–222). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salberg, J. (2010). Historical overview. In J. Salberg (Ed.), Good enough endings: Breaks, interruptions, and terminations from contemporary relational perspectives (pp. 3–24). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Washington School of Social Work, Seattle, WA, USA

    William S. Etnyre

Authors
  1. William S. Etnyre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William S. Etnyre.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Etnyre, W.S. J. Salberg (ed.): Good Enough Endings: Breaks, Interruptions, and Terminations from Contemporary Relational Perspectives (2010). Clin Soc Work J 39, 318–320 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-011-0324-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-011-0324-7

Search

Navigation