Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding Empathy as a Complex Construct: A Review of the Literature

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to describe empathy as a complex construct, and its implications for practice. A review of current literature affirms the central role of empathy in psychotherapy, and the importance of mastering it for effective practice. Contributions from perspectives of attitude, context and social neuroscience converge to suggest a dynamic complex construct, useful as a framework for practice application. Influenced by factors such as attitudes, contexts, and values, the quality of empathic engagement is shown to emerge from their unique mix, within and between therapist and patient, and is always grounded in shared, embodied humanity. The essential role of the therapist’s self-regulation is demonstrated. A number of strategies for more consciously managing empathic engagement, and for balancing affect-regulation challenges with self-care are described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angus, L., & Kagan, F. (2007). Empathic relational bonds and personal agency in psychotherapy: Implications for psychotherapy supervision, practice and research. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 44(4), 371–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Applegate, J., & Shapiro, J. (2005). Neurobiology applied. Neurobiology for clinical social work: Theory and practice (1st ed., pp. 141–159). New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

  • Bachelor, A. (1988). How clients perceive therapist empathy: A content analysis of “received” empathy. Psychotherapy, 25(2), 227–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett-Lennard, G. T. (1981). The empathy cycle: Refinement of a nuclear concept. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28(2), 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beebe, B. (2009). Capturing the image of mother-infant interaction: Links to the clinical encounter. In Instutute of contemporary psychotherapy & psychoanalysis, 15th annual conference. Rockville, MD: Johns Hopkins University Center.

  • Beebe, B., Knoblauch, S., Rustin, J., & Sorter, D. (2005). Forms of intersubjectivity in infant research and adult treatment: A systems view. In B. Beebe, S. Knoblauch, S. Rustin, & D. Sorter (Eds.), Forms of intersubjectivity in infant research and adult treatment (pp. 1–28). New York: Other Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, J. (1988). The bonds of love (1st ed.). New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohart, A., & Greenberg, L. (1999a). Empathy and psychotherapy: An introductory overview. In A. Bohart & L. Greenberg (Eds.), Empathy reconsidered: New directions in psychotherapy (2nd ed., pp. 3–31). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohart, A., & Greenberg, L. (1999b). Empathy: Where are we and where do we go from here? In A. Bohart & L. Greenberg (Eds.), Empathy reconsidered: New directions in psychotherapy (2nd ed., p. 419). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohart, A., Elliott, R., Greenberg, L., & Watson, J. (2002). Empathy. In J. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients (1st ed., pp. 89–108). New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozarth, J. (1999). Empathy from the framework of client-centered theory and the rogerian hypothesis. In A. Bohart & L. Greenberg (Eds.), Empathy reconsidered: New directions in psychotherapy (2nd ed., pp. 81–102). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozarth, J. (2009). Rogerian empathy in an organismic theory: A way of being. In J. Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (1st ed., pp. 101–112). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decety, J., & Ickes, W. (2009). Introduction: Seeking to understand the minds (and brains) of people who are seeking to understand other people’s minds. In J. Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (1st ed., pp. vii–ix). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekeyser, M., Elliott, R., & Leijssen, M. (2009). Empathy in psychotherapy: Dialogue and embodied understanding. In J. Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (1st ed., pp. 113–124). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan, C., & Hill, C. (1996). The current state of empathy research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 261–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyche, L., & Zayas, L. (2001). Cross-cultural empathy and training the contemporary psychotherapist. Clinical Social Work Journal, 29(3), 245–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonagy, P., Moran, G., Edgcumbe, R., Kennedy, H., & Target, M. (1993). The role of mental representation and mental processes in therapeutic action. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 48, 9–48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E., & Tartget, M. (2004). Affect regulation, mentalization, and the development of the self (1st ed.). New York: Other Press.

  • Freedberg, S. (2007). Re-examining empathy: A relational-feminist point of view. Social Work, 52(3), 251–259.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallese, V. (2009). Mirror neurons, embodied simulation, and the neural basis of social identification. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 19, 519–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginot, E. (2009). The empathic power of enactments: The link between neuropsychological processes and an expanded definition of empathy. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 26(3), 290–309. doi:10.1037/a0016449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goubert, L., Craig, K., & Buysse, A. (2009). Perceiving others in pain: Experimental and clinical evidence on the role of empathy. In J. Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (1st ed., pp. 153–165). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grawe, K. (2007). Neuropsychotherapy: How the neurosciences inform effective psychotherapy (1st ed.). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, L., Watson, J., Elliott, R., & Bohart, A. (2001). Empathy. Psychotherapy, 38(4), 380–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, M. (1997). Empathic performance of the clinician as a function of mental representation and attitudinal focus. Unpublished PhD, Smith College for Social Work, Northampton, MA.

  • Horowitz, J. (1998). Contemporary psychoanalysis and social work theory. Clinical Social Work Journal, 26(4), 369–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, A. (2006). The alliance in context: Accomplishments, challenges, and future directions. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 43(3), 258–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ickes, W. (2009). Empathic accuracy: Its links to clinical, cognitive, developmental, social, and physiological psychology. In J. Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (1st ed., pp. 57–70). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, A. (1999). The empathic context in psychotherapy with people of color. In A. Bohart & L. Greenberg (Eds.), Empathy reconsidered: New directions in psychotherapy (2nd ed., pp. 321–341). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, J. (1999). Relational development through mutual empathy. In A. Bohart & L. Greenberg (Eds.), Empathy reconsidered: New directions in psychotherapy (2nd ed., pp. 343–351). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiersky, S., & Beebe, B. (1994). The reconstruction of early nonverbal relatedness in the treatment of difficult patients: A special form of empathy. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 4(3), 389–408. Retrieved from http://libproxy.smith.edu:4801/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=1994-46220-001&site=ehost-live.

  • Kohut, H. (1978). Introspection, empathy, and psychoanalysis: An examination of the relationship between mode of observation and theory. In P. Ornstein (Ed.), The search for the self (pp. 205–232). New York: International University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. (1984). In A. Goldberg (Ed.), How does analysis cure (1st ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • MacIsaac, D. (1999). Empathy: Heinz kohut’s contribution. In A. Bohart & L. Greenberg (Eds.), Empathy reconsidered: New directions in psychotherapy (2nd ed., pp. 245–264). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahrer, A. (1999). Empathy as therapist-client alignment. In A. Bohart & L. Greenberg (Eds.), Empathy reconsidered: New directions in psychotherapy (2nd ed., pp. 187–213). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marci, C., & Reiss, H. (2005). The clinical relevance of psychophysiology: Support for the psychobiology of empathy and psychodynamic process. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 59(3), 213–226.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marci, C. D., Ham, J., Moran, E., & Orr, S. P. (2007). Physiologic correlates of perceived therapist empathy and social-emotional process during psychotherapy. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 195(2), 103–111. doi:10.1097/01.nmd.0000253731.71025.fc.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J., & Dawda, D. (1999). Beyond empathy: A hermeneutically inspired inquiry into interpersonal understanding in psychotherapy. Theory & Psychology, 9(4), 459. Retrieved from http://libproxy.smith.edu:4801/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=4548277&site=ehost-live.

  • Meyers, S. (2000). Empathic listening: Reports on the experience of being heard. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 40(Spring), 148–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, D. C. (1995). Negative outcome in psychotherapy: A critical review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nissim-Sabat, M. (1995). Towards a phenomenology of empathy. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 49(2), 163. Retrieved from http://libproxy.smith.edu:4801/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=9506270619&site=ehost-live.

  • O’Hara, M. (1999). Relational empathy: Beyond modernist egocentrism to postmodern holistic contextualism. In A. Bohart & L. Greenberg (Eds.), Empathy reconsidered: New directions in psychotherapy (2nd ed., pp. 295–319). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parson, E. (1993). Ethnotherapeutic empathy (EthE)—part I: Definition, theory, and process. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 23(1), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, P. (2008). Traditional and nontraditional perspectives on empathy, help-seeking, and healthy outcomes. In P. Pedersen, H. Crethar, & J. Carlson (Eds.), Inclusive cultural empathy: Making relationships central in counseling and psychotherapy (1st ed., pp. 7–21). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, M. A., & Vetere, A. (2009). Lost in translation: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of mental health professionals’ experiences of empathy in clinical work with an interpreter. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 82(3), 305–321. doi:10.1348/147608308X397059.

  • Raines, J. (1990). Empathy in clinical social work. Clinical Social Work Journal, 18(1), 57–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J., & Chinsky, J. (1972). Accurate empathy: Confusion of a construct. Psychological Bulletin, 77(6), 400–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, B. (2000). The body remembers: The psychophysiology of trauma and trauma treatment. New York: W.W. Norton & company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, B., & Rand, M. (2006). Help for the helper: The psychophysiology of compassion fatigue and vicarious trauma (1st ed.). New York: W.W. Norton & company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwaber, E. (1984). Empathy: A mode of analytic listening. In J. Lichtenberg, M. Bornstein, & D. Silver (Eds.), Empathy II (pp. 143–172). Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sells, D., Topor, A., & Davidson, L. (2004). Generating coherence out of chaos: Examples of the utility of empathic bridges in phenomenological research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 35(2), 253–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S. (1995). Looking at patient responses: Judging empathic attunement. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), The impact of new ideas: Progress in self psychology (1st ed., Vol. 11, pp. 277–290). Hillsdale, NJ 07642: The Analytic Press.

  • Shlien, J. (1999). Empathy in psychotherapy: A vital mechanism? yes. Therapist’s conceit? all too often. By itself enough? no. In A. Bohart & L. Greenberg (Eds.), Empathy reconsidered: New directions in psychotherapy (2nd ed., pp. 63–80). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D., Sander, L., Nahum, J., Harrison, A., Lyons-Ruth, K., Morgan, A., et al. (1998). Non-interpretive mechanisms in psychoanalytic therapy: The “something more” than interpretation. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 79, 903–921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolorow, R., & Atwood, G. (1992). Contexts of being: The intersubjective foundations of psychological life. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sue, S., & Lam, A. (2002). Cultural and demographic diversity. In J. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work (1st ed., pp. 401–421). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teicholz, J. (2006). Qualities of engagement and the analyst’s theory. International Journal of Psychoanalytic Psychology. (pre-print version).

  • Trop, J., & Stolorow, R. (1999). Therapeutic empathy: An intersubjective perspective. In A. Bohart & L. Greenberg (Eds.), Empathy reconsidered (2nd ed., pp. 279–291). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M. (1999). Does empathy cure? A theoretical consideration of empathy, processing, and personal narrative. In A. Bohart & L. Greenberg (Eds.), Empathy reconsidered: New directions in psychotherapy (2nd ed., pp. 125–140). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J., & Greenberg, L. (2009). Empathic resonance: A neuroscience perspective. In J. Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (1st ed., pp. 125–137). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wintersteen, M., Mensinger, J., & Diamond, G. (2005). Do gender and racial differences between patient and therapist affect therapeutic alliance and treatment retention in adolescents? Professional Psychology; Research and Practice, 36(4), 400–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Smith College School for Social Work, Northampton, MA, USA

    Susan B. Gibbons

  2. 488 Lymington Road, Severna Park, MD, 21146, USA

    Susan B. Gibbons

Authors
  1. Susan B. Gibbons
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan B. Gibbons.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gibbons, S.B. Understanding Empathy as a Complex Construct: A Review of the Literature. Clin Soc Work J 39, 243–252 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-010-0305-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-010-0305-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation