EMDR and the Adaptive Information Processing Model: Integrative Treatment and Case Conceptualization

Abstract

EMDR is a comprehensive psychotherapy approach that is compatible with all contemporary theoretical orientations. Internationally recognized as a frontline trauma treatment, it is also applicable to a broad range of clinical issues. As a distinct form of psychotherapy, the treatment emphasis is placed on directly processing the neurophysiologically stored memories of events that set the foundation for pathology and health. The adaptive information processing model that governs EMDR practice invites the therapist to address the overall clinical picture that includes the past experiences that contribute to a client’s current difficulties, the present events that trigger maladaptive responses, and to develop more adaptive neural networks of memory in order to enhance positive responses in the future. The clinical application of EMDR is elaborated through a description of the eight phases of treatment with a case example that illustrates the convergences with psychodynamic, cognitive-behavioral, and systemic practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2004). Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with acute stress disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association Practice Guidelines.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barlow, D. H., Shapiro, F., & White, M. (2005). Supervision panel. Anaheim, CA: Evolution of Psychotherapy Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bisson, J., & Andrew, M. (2007). Psychological treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2007, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD003388. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003388.

  4. Brown, K. W., McGoldrick, T., & Buchanan, R. (1997). Body dysmorphic disorder: Seven cases treated with eye movement desensitization and reprocessing. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 25, 203–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, S., & Shapiro, F. (2006). EMDR in the treatment of borderline personality disorder. Clinical Case Studies, 5, 403–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chemtob, C. M., Tolin, D. F., van der Kolk, B. A., & Pitman, R. K. (2000). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing. In E. B. Foa, T. M. Keane, & M. J. Friedman (Eds.), Effective treatments for PTSD: Practice guidelines from the international society for traumatic stress studies (pp. 139–155–333–335). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dworkin, M. (2005). EMDR and the relational imperative. New York: Brunner-Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Edmond, T., Sloan, L., & McCarty, D. (2004). Sexual abuse survivors’ perceptions of the effectiveness of EMDR and eclectic therapy: A mixed-methods study. Research on Social Work Practice, 14, 259–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaslow, F. W., Nurse, A. R., & Thompson, P. (2002). Utilization of EMDR in conjunction with family systems therapy. In F. Shapiro (Ed.), EMDR and the paradigm prism: Experts of diverse orientations explore an integrated treatment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Levin, P., Lazrove, S., & van der Kolk, B. A. (1999). What psychological testing and neuroimaging tell us about the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) by eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR). Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 13, 159–172.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Madrid, A., Skolek, S., & Shapiro, F. (2006). Repairing failures in bonding through EMDR. Clinical Case Studies, 5, 271–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Manfield, P., & Shapiro, F. (2003). The application of EMDR to the treatment of personality disorders. In J. F. Magnavita & J. F. Magnavita (Eds.), Handbook of personality disorders: Theory and practice (pp. 304–330). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  13. McGoldrick, T., Begum, M., & Brown, K. W. (2008). EMDR and olfactory reference syndrome: A case series. Journal of EMDR Practice and Research, 2, 63–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Perkins, B. R., & Rouanzoin, C. C. (2002). A critical evaluation of current views regarding eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR): Clarifying points of confusion. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 77–97.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ray, A. L., & Zbik, A. (2001). Cognitive behavioral therapies and beyond. In C. D. Tollison, J. R. Satterhwaite, & J. W. Tollison (Eds.), Practical pain management (3rd ed., pp. 189–208). Philadelphia: Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ricci, R. J., Clayton, C. A., & Shapiro, F. (2006). Some effects of EMDR treatment with previously abused child molesters: Theoretical reviews and preliminary findings. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 17, 538–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Russell, M. (2008). Treating traumatic amputation-related phantom limb pain: A case study utilizing eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) within the armed services. Clinical Case Studies, 7, 136–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sack, M., Lempa, W., Steinmetz, A., Lamprecht, F., & Hofmann, A. (2008). Alterations in autonomic tone during trauma exposure using eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR)—results of a preliminary investigation. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 22, 1264–1271.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schneider, J., Hofmann, A., Rost, C., & Shapiro, F. (2007). EMDR and phantom limb pain: Case study, theoretical implications, and treatment guidelines. Journal of EMDR Science and Practice, 1, 31–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schneider, J., Hofmann, A., Rost, C., & Shapiro, F. (2008). EMDR in the treatment of chronic phantom limb pain. Pain Medicine, 9, 76–82.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schore, A. N. (2003). Affect dysregulation and the disorders of the self. NY: WW Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shapiro, F. (1995). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing: Basic principles, protocols and procedures. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shapiro, F. (2001). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing: Basic principles, protocols and procedures (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shapiro, F. (2002). Paradigms, processing, and personality development. In F. Shapiro (Ed.), EMDR as an integrative psychotherapy approach: Experts of diverse orientations explore the paradigm prism (pp. 3–26). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shapiro, F. (2005). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) training manual. Watsonville, CA: EMDR Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shapiro, F. (2007). EMDR, adaptive information processing, and case conceptualization. Journal of EMDR Practice and Research, 1, 68–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shapiro, F., & Forrest, M. S. (1997). EMDR. New York: BasicBooks.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shapiro, F., Kaslow, F., & Maxfield, L. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of EMDR and family therapy processes. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shellenberger, S. (2007). Using the genogram with families for assessment and treatment—in EMDR and family processes book. In F. Shapiro, F. Kaslow, & L. Maxfield (Eds.), Handbook of EMDR and family therapy processes (pp. 76–94). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Siegel, D. J. (2002). The developing mind and the resolution of trauma: Some ideas about information processing and an interpersonal neurobiology of psychotherapy. In F. Shapiro (Ed.), EMDR as an integrative psychotherapy approach: Experts of diverse orientations explore the paradigm prism (pp. 85–122). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Solomon, M. F., Neborsky, R. J., McCullough, L., Alpert, M., Shapiro, F., & Malan, D. (2001). Short-term therapy for long-term change. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Solomon, R. W., & Shapiro, F. (2008). EMDR and the adaptive information processing model: Potential mechanisms of change. Journal of EMDR Practice and Research, 2, 315–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Stickgold, R. (2002). EMDR: A putative neurobiological mechanism of action. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 61–75.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Stickgold, R. (2008). Sleep-dependent memory processing and EMDR action. Journal of EMDR Practice and Research, 2, 289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. van der Kolk, B. A. (2002). Beyond the talking cure: Somatic experience and subcortical imprints in the treatment of trauma. In F. Shapiro (Ed.), EMDR as an integrative psychotherapy approach: Experts of diverse orientations explore the paradigm prism (pp. 57–84). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. van der Kolk, B., Spinazzola, J., Blaustein, M., Hopper, J., Hopper, E., Korn, D., et al. (2007). A randomized clinical trial of EMDR, fluoxetine and pill placebo in the treatment of PTSD: Treatment effects and long-term maintenance. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 68, 37–46.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wachtel, P. L. (1977). Psychoanalysis and behavior therapy: Toward an integration. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wachtel, P. L. (2002). EMDR and psychoanalysis. In F. Shapiro (Ed.), EMDR and the paradigm prism (pp. 123–150). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wesselman, D. (2007). Treating attachment issues through EMDR and a family systems approach. In F. Shapiro, F. Kaslow, & L. Maxfield (Eds.), Handbook of EMDR and family therapy processes (pp. 113–130). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wesselmann, D., & Potter, A. E. (2009). Change in adult attachment status following treatment with EMDR: Three case studies. Journal of EMDR Practice and Research, 3, 178–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wilensky, M. (2006). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) as a treatment for phantom limb pain. Journal of Brief Therapy, 5, 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zabukovec, J., Lazrove, S., & Shapiro, F. (2000). Self-healing aspects of EMDR: The therapeutic change process and perspectives of integrated psychotherapies. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 10, 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deany Laliotis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shapiro, F., Laliotis, D. EMDR and the Adaptive Information Processing Model: Integrative Treatment and Case Conceptualization. Clin Soc Work J 39, 191–200 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-010-0300-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • EMDR
  • Adaptive information processing
  • Integrative treatment
  • Memory networks