Skip to main content
Log in

Reconsidering Therapeutic Neutrality

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent decades, with the emergence of postmodern philosophies and of relational psychoanalysis, therapeutic neutrality has come under challenge as being both an impossible and an undesirable analytic stance. This article explores recent understandings of transference and of therapeutic neutrality; the position of those relational psychoanalysts who posit that explicit use of intersubjectivity is the central treatment vehicle of psychoanalysis; and presents material from the treatment of an individual with a borderline personality disorder, using the developmental, self, and object relations approach of James Masterson, to illustrate some potential dangers of abandoning a neutral stance when treating such clients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Some patients with personality disorders cannot tolerate such direct challenge to their self-representation and require a different intervention. For example, narcissistic patients require an intervention that combines mirroring with interpretation of defense.

References

  • Aron, L. (1996). A meeting of minds: Mutuality in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1915). Observations on transference love. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, (Vol. 12, pp. 157–171). London: Hogarth Press.

  • Greenberg, J., & Mitchell, S. (1983). Object relations in psychoanalytic theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, I. Z. (1991). Discussion: Toward a social-constructivist view of the psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 1, 74–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kernberg, O. (1975). Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism. New York: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernberg, O. (1984). Severe personality disorders. New York: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernberg, O. (1996). The analyst’s authority in the psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 65, 137–157.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. (1977). The restoration of the self. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. (1984). How does analysis cure?. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahler, M., Pine, F., & Bergman, A. (1975). The psychological birth of the human infant. London: Maresfield Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masterson, J. F. (1976). Psychotherapy of the borderline adult. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masterson, J. F. (1988). The search for the real self: Unmasking the personality disorders of our age. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masterson, J. F. (1993). The emerging self: A developmental self, and object relations approach to the treatment of the closet narcissistic disorder of the self. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masterson, J. F. (2000). The personality disorders: A new look at the developmental, self, and object relations approach. Phoenix: Zeig, Tucker and Theisen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masterson, J. F., & Klein, R. (Eds.). (1989). Psychotherapy of the disorders of the self: The Masterson approach. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masterson, J. F., & Lieberman, A. R. (Eds.). (2004). A therapist’s guide to the personality disorders: The Masterson approach. Phoenix: Zeig, Tucker and Theisen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. A. (1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis: An integration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. A. (2000). Relationality: From attachment to intersubjectivity. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Racker, H. (1968). Transference and countertransference. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolorow, R. B., Brandchaft, B., & Atwood, G. E. (1987). Psychoanalytic treatment. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westen, D. (2002). The search for objectivity in the study of subjectivity: Reply to commentary. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 12, 915–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jerry S. Katz.

Additional information

The author wishes to thank his colleagues on the faculty of the Masterson Institute for Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy for their assistance: Dr. Judith Pearson, Dr. Murray Schane, Carolyn Bankston, Amanda Cassidy, Loray Daws, and William Griffiths.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Katz, J.S. Reconsidering Therapeutic Neutrality. Clin Soc Work J 38, 306–315 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-010-0272-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-010-0272-7

Keywords

Navigation