Abstract
The case of a 30-year-old woman with treatment refractory anorexia is presented through a first person narrative and countertransference experience. The case study attempts to explore how ethical treatment decisions are made, while also addressing how we live with those choices.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Draper, H. (2000). Anorexia nervosa and respecting a refusal of life prolonging therapy: A limited justification. Bioethics, 14(2), 120–133.
Kasman, D. (2004). When is medical treatment futile? Journal of General Internal Medicine, 19, 1053–1056.
Keel, P., Dorere, D., Eddy, K., Franko, D., Charatan, D., & Hertzog, D. (2003). Predictors of mortality in eating disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60, 179–182.
Kernberg, O., Selzer, M., Koenigsberg, H., Carr, A., & Applebaum, A. (1989). Psychodynamic psychotherapy of borderline patients. New York: Basic Books.
McIntosh, V., Jordan, J., Carter, F., Luty, S., McKenzie, J., Bulik, C., et al. (2005). Three psychotherapies for anorexia nervosa: A randomized controlled trial. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(4), 741–747.
Strober, M. (2006). Managing the chronic, treatment resistant patient with anorexia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 36, 245–255.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lopez, A. Moral Residue: Difficult Ethical Choices in the Treatment of Refractory Anorexia Nervosa. Clin Soc Work J 38, 236–239 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-009-0230-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-009-0230-4