Abstract
Discussions pertaining to culture, power and/or identity frequently create tensions that are enacted by dyads and groups within schools, workplaces and communities. Although tensions can easily escalate into conflict or violence, we have observed that these tensions can serve as prompts that promote a change process. When individual perspectives are challenged, some participants are able to dissemble their views and consider other perspectives from which new understandings and views emerge. At times, when groups seem to be on the threshold of overt conflict, some participants engage in processes that examine the tension, explore new possibilities, and alter the view of one’s subjectivity. We suggest that these activities occur as momentary states in psychological spaces conceptualized as third spaces (Bhabha, The location of culture. London: Routledge, 1994). In this paper, we use concepts from psychodynamic and social theories to describe the conditions that coalesce to form states of mind (nepantla) (Anzaldúa, Borderlands/La Frontera: The new mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books, 1999; Interviews Entrevistas. New York: Routledge, 2000) and the ability to engage in new relational possibilities (third space activities) with dyads and groups, outside of psychotherapy. The conditions include: critical consciousness, regulation, recognition, and responsibility. We then describe how such momentary experiences can subsequently result in an examination of one’s subjectivity, particularly as it pertains to issues regarding culture, power, and identity. Throughout the paper we provide four examples from various settings to illustrate these concepts and processes. Given the increasing racial/ethnic diversity of clients and clinical social workers in North America, this concept of third spaces holds particular relevance for contemporary clinical social work practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anzaldúa, G. E. (1999). Borderlands/La Frontera: The new mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.
Anzaldúa, G. E. (2000). Interviews Entrevistas (A. L. Keating, Ed.). New York: Routledge.
Anzaldúa, G. E. (2002). Preface. In: G. E. Anzaldúa & A. Keating (Eds.), This bridge we call home: Radical visions for transformation (pp 1–5). New York: Routledge.
Basham, K. K., & Miehls, D. (2004). Transforming the legacy: Couple therapy with survivors of childhood trauma. New York: Columbia University Press.
Benjamin, J. (2002). The rhythm of recognition: Comments on the work of Louis Sander. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 12(1), 43–53.
Benjamin, J. (2004). Beyond doer and done to: An intersubjective view of thirdness. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73, 5–46.
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.
Brofenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brofenbrenner, U. (Ed.). (2005). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Bromberg, P. M. (1993). Shadow and substance: A relational perspective on clinical process. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 10, 147–168.
Dean, R. (2001). The myth of the cross-cultural competence. Families in Society, 82(6), 623–630.
Elkind, S. (2002). Review essay: On reading in a potential space. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 12(2), 285–298.
Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E., & Target, M. (2002). Affect regulation, mentalization, and the development of the self. New York: Other Press.
Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (Alan Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.
Freire, P. (1970/1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
Freire, P. (1973/1992). Education for critical consciousness. New York: Continuum.
Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of the oppressed. In A. M. A. Freire & D. Macedo (Eds.), The Paulo Freire reader (pp. 45–79). New York: Continuum.
Germain, C. B., & Bloom, M. (1999). Human behavior in the social environment: An ecological view (2nd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
Gerson, S. (2002). Review essay: Creating space for difference. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 12(2), 299–304.
Irving, A., & Young, T. (2002). Paradigm for pluralism: Mikhail Bakhtin and social work practice. Social Work, 47(1), 19–29.
Irving, A., & Young, T. (2004). Perpetual liminality: Re-readings of subjectivity and diversity in clinical social work classrooms. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 74(2), 213–227.
Keating, A. L. (2006). From borderlands and new mestizas to nepantlas and nepantleras: Anzaldúan theories for social change. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge, 4, 5–16.
Keenan, E. K. (2005). Introduction to the book reviews. Clinical Social Work Journal, 33(1), 103–106.
Marcus, G. E., & Fischer, M. M. J. (1999). Anthropology as cultural critique: An experimental moment in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Miehls, D., & Moffatt, K. (2000). Constructing social work identity based on the reflexive self. British Journal of Social Work, 30, 339–348.
Ogden, T. (1994). Subjects of analysis. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
Ogden, T. (2004). The analytic third: Implications for psychoanalytic theory and technique. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, LXXIII, 167–195.
Pérez, E. (2005). Gloria Anzaldúa: La gran nueva mestiza theorist, writer, activist-scholar. NWSA Journal, 17(2), 1–10.
Piers, C. (2005). The mind’s multiplicity and continuity. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 15(2), 229–254.
Pizer, S. (1998). Building bridges: The negotiation of paradox in psychoanalysis. New York: The Analytic Press.
Saari, C. (2002). The environment: Its role in psychosocial functioning and psychotherapy. New York: Columbia University Press.
Sander, L.W. (1983). Polarity, paradox, and the organizing process in development. In J. D. Call, E. Galenson, & R. L. Tyson (Eds.), Frontiers of infant psychiatry, No. 1. New York: Basic Books.
Sander, L. W. (2002). Thinking differently: Principles of process in living systems and the specificity of being known. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 12(1), 11–42.
Stacey, R. (2003). Complexity and group processes: A radically social understanding of individuals. New York: Brunner-Routledge.
Stern, D. N., Sander, L. W., Nahum, J. P., Harrison, A. M., Lyons-Ruth, K., Morgan, A. C., Bruschweiler-Stern, N., & Tronick, E. Z. (1998). Non-interpretive mechanisms in psychoanalytic inquiry: The ‘something more’ than interpretation. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 79, 903–921.
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (2006). Dynamic systems theories. In R. M. Lerner (Vol. Ed.) & W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Editors-in-Chief), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 258–312). New York: Wiley.
Tyson, P. (2005). Affects, agency, and self-regulation: Complexity theory in the treatment of children with anxiety and disruptive behavior disorders. JAPA, 53(1), 159–187.
Von Bertalanffy, L. (1969). General systems theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: Braziller.
Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Playing and reality. New York: Penguin Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Keenan, E.K., Miehls, D. Third Space Activities and Change Processes: An Exploration of Ideas from Social and Psychodynamic Theories. Clin Soc Work J 36, 165–175 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-007-0117-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-007-0117-1