Abstract
As psychoanalysts, we have to be constantly aware of the impact of external reality upon the analytic process, whether this comes from the world outside the consulting room or from within it. In particular, I am concerned with the disturbing influence that may come from the analyst’s devotion to new theoretical positions and ways of working. Also we cannot prescribe ‘good experience’ for any patient. We can only follow the process, and this may require of us that we survive being used by the patient to represent all that has been worst in the patient’s life. We should never deflect that.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P. J. Casement (2002) Learning from our mistakes: Beyond dogma in psychoanalysis and psychotherapy Guilford New York
S. Isaacs (1948) ArticleTitleThe nature and function of phantasy International Journal of Psychoanalysis 29 73097
R. J. Langs (1978) The listening process Aronson New York
H. Searles (1975) The patient as therapist to his analyst P. L. Giovacchini (Eds) Tactics and techniques in psychoanalytic therapy, (Vol. 11). Aronson New York
D. W. Winnicott (1970) ArticleTitleFear of breakdown International Review of Psycho-Analysis [1974] 1 103–07
D. W. Winnicott (1971) Playing and reality Tavistock London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Casement, P. Using Analytic Space: A Challenge to Contemporary Psychoanalysis. Clin Soc Work J 33, 389–400 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-005-7033-z
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-005-7033-z