Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of Expected Shortfall Using Quantile Regression: A Comparison Study

  • Published:
Computational Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Expected Shortfall (\(\mathrm {ES}\)) is one of the most heavily used measures of financial risk. It is defined as a scaled integral of the quantile of the profit-and-loss distribution up to a certainly confidence level. As such, quantile regression (QR) and the closely related expectile regression (ER) methods are natural techniques for estimating \(\mathrm {ES}\). In this paper, we survey QR and ER based estimators of ES and introduce several novel variants. We compare the performance of these methods through simulation and through a data analysis based on four major US market indices: the S&P 500 Index, the Russell 2000 Index, the Dow Jones Industrial Average, and the NASDAQ Composite Index. Our results suggest that QR and ER methods often work better than other, more standard, approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A dimension reduction subspace is the column space of any matrix \(\mathbf {\Gamma }\) such that the response \(r_k\) and the vector of predictors \({\mathbf {r}}_{k,p}\) are conditionally independent given \(\mathbf {\Gamma }^{\top }{\mathbf {r}}_{k,p}\). The central subspace is the dimension reduction subspace with the smallest dimension.

References

  • Aigner, D. J., Amemiya, T., & Poirier, D. J. (1976). On the estimation of production frontiers: Maximum likelihood estimation of the parameters of a discontinuous density function. International Economic Review, 17, 377–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J. M., & Heath, D. (1997). Thinking coherently. risk, 10. November, 68, 71.

  • Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2013). Consultative Document, Fundamental Review of the Trading Book: A revised Market Risk framework. Switzerland: Basel http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs265.pdf).

  • Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broda, S. A., & Paolella, M. S. (2011). Expected shortfall for distributions in finance. In P. Cizek, W. K. Härdle, & R. Weron (Eds.), Statistical Tools for Finance and Insurance (pp. 57–99). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri, P., Doksum, K., & Samarov, A. (1997). On average derivative quantile regression. Annals of Statistics, 25(2), 715–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christou, E. (2020). Central quantile subspace. Statistics and Computing, 30, 677–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christou, E., & Grabchak, M. (2019). Estimation of value-at-risk using single index quantile regression. Journal of Applied Statistics, 46(13), 2418–2433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cont, R. (2001). Empirical properties of asset returns: Stylized facts and statistical issue. Quantitative Finance, 1(2), 223–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Z., Granger, C. W. J., & Engle, R. F. (1993). A long memory property of stock market returns and a new model. Journal of Empirical Finance, 1, 83–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Embrechts, P., Kaufmann, R., & Patie, P. (2005). Strategic long-term financial risks: Single risk factors. Computational Optimization and Applications, 32, 61–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity with estimates of the variance of U.K. inflation. Econometrica, 50(4), 987–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J. (1992). Design-adaptive nonparametric regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87(420), 998–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, Y., Härdle, W. K., Wang, W., & Zhu, L. (2018). Single-index-based CoVaR with very high-dimensional covariates. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 36(2), 212–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, C., & Steel, M. F. (1998). On Bayesian modeling of fat tails and skewness. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93, 359–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gneiting, T. (2011). Making and evaluating point forecasts. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 106(494), 746–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenker, R. (2005). Quantile regression. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koenker, R., & Xiao, Z. (2006). Quantile autoregression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101(475), 980–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong, E., & Xia, Y. (2012). A single-index quantile regression model and its estimator. Econometric Theory, 28(4), 730–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, K.-C. (1991). Sliced inverse regression for dimension reduction. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86, 316–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadarajah, S., Zhang, B., & Chan, S. (2014). Estimation methods for expected shortfall. Quantitative Finance, 14(2), 271–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D. B. (1991). Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica, 59, 347–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newey, W. K., & Powell, J. L. (1987). Asymmetric least squares estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55, 819–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. W. (2008a). Estimating value at risk and expected shortfall using expectiles. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 6(2), 231–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. W. (2008b). Using exponentially weighted quantile regression to estimate value at risk and expected shortfall. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 6(3), 382–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, T. Z., Yu, K., & Yu, Y. (2010). Single index quantile regression. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 101(7), 1607–1621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, Z., Guo, H., & Lam, M. S. (2015). Quantile regression and value at risk. In C. F. Lee & J. C. Lee (Eds.), Handbook of Financial Econometrics and Statistics (pp. 1143–1167). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, K., & Jones, M. C. (1998). Local linear quantile regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93(441), 228–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors wish to thank the referees for comments that lead to improvements in the presentation of this paper. The second author’s work was funded, in part, by the Russian Science Foundation (Project No. 17-11-01098).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eliana Christou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Christou, E., Grabchak, M. Estimation of Expected Shortfall Using Quantile Regression: A Comparison Study. Comput Econ 60, 725–753 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-021-10164-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-021-10164-z

Keywords

Navigation