Skip to main content
Log in

Human Problem-Solving: Standing on the Shoulders of the Giants

  • Published:
Computational Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human problem-solving is a fundamental yet complex phenomena; it has fascinated and attracted a lot of researchers to understand, and theorize about it. Modeling and simulating human problem-solving played a pivotal role in Herbert Simon’s research program. Herbert Simon (along with Allen Newell and Cliff Shaw) was among the pioneers of artificial intelligence, by interlinking cognitive psychology, economics, philosophy, and computer science through the research work on human problem-solving. His curiosity and work focused not on replicating the brain but to understand and replicate human problem solving techniques (which he often referred to as programs/algorithms). The main aim of this article is to trace the origins and paths that enabled Simon (Newell and Shaw) to further develop his (their) original ideas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Wilhelm Wundt—the father of experimental psychology, was given a lab, in the University of Leipzig, in 1876, to conduct experiments for the course he was teaching. By 1879 Wundt began various experiments that were not part of his course work, which marked the start of what was to become one of the first and famous experimental psychology laboratories. Wundt’s contemporary at the time was Franz Brentano—whose work inspired and led to Gestalt psychology. For detailed study on theories of Brentano and Wundt, see Titchener (1921).

  2. Aster (1908: 62) a contemporary critic, commented “Bühler’s... experiments... are an attempt to check and confirm Husserl’s phenomenology in an experimental way”.

  3. The distinction between the works of Würzburg school and Gestalt school, as pointed out by Simon (1999, p. 3), “the Würzburgers, by and large, were reductionists who sought explanations in the form of mechanisms and thought of themselves as biologists; the Berliners [Gestalt psychologists] were much more holistic in their outlook, and often anti-mechanistic in their language.”

  4. Carl Stumpf—the “grandfather of Gestalt psychology”, played a pivotal role in establishing the Berlin School of experimental psychology. His students include Max Wertheimer, Kurt Koffka, Wolfgang Köhler, and others. Stumpf was a student of Franz Brentano; Brentano’s other students include Edmund Husserl, Christian von Ehrenfels, Sigmund Freud, and others. It is also interesting to note both Ehrenfels—who first formulated notions of Gestalt qualities (see von Ehrenfels 1890), and Husserl—founder of phenomenology, seem to have been inspired by Ernst Mach’s Beiträge zur Analyse der Empfindungen (Contributions to the Analysis of Sensations, 1886), in formulating their very similar concepts of gestalt and figural moment, respectively. For more, see Humphrey (1951) and Smith (1988).

  5. Wertheimer got his doctoral degree under the supervision of Külpe at the University of Würzburg in 1904. His observation and study of phi phenomena (see Wertheimer 1912) is considered to be the origin of the Gestalt School. Wertheimer’s other pioneering work was with children in class (see Wertheimer, Productive Theory, 1945).

  6. Productive Thinking is a process involving understanding the phenomenal structure of the problem and the creation of new solutions; while, Reproductive Thinking is more of a mechanical application of associative thoughts that has been learnt from the past experience used to carry out routine tasks.

  7. Otto Selz wrote a postdoctoral thesis titled: “Über die Gesetze des geordneten Denkverlaufs” (On the laws of the ordered thought process) and worked under the guidance of Oswald Külpe in Bonn, 1910–1915.

  8. Selz’s model became a basis for de Groot’s Study on Chess, Karl Duncker’s Thinking and Newell–Simon’s Human Problem Solving research (cf., Newell and Simon 1972, p. 874).

  9. Newell (1967, pp. 803–804; Italics added) describes,

    Written as history a science gives the appearance of orderly movement performed to a stately dialectical minuet. Prior to the turn of the century psychology emerged from its subordination to philosophy. It was experimental, viewed itself as the science of the contents of the mind, and held to a theory of the association of ideas. Then occurred the reactions. Behaviorism kept the mechanistic flavor but rejected the mentalism, especially the use of introspection as an experimental technique. Gestalt theory, contrariwise, rejected the mechanistic analysis. This makes a rather pat picture of German and American psychology. But of course the diversity was in fact much greater; history simply trims it away.

    Otto Selz was one who was trimmed....

  10. In 1943, Selz though distinguished with the Iron Cross for his service in the World War I was arrested in Amsterdam and deported to the Auschwitz concentration camp. Selz’s life ended tragedically even before reaching Auschwitz, on 27th August 1943.

  11. Selz’s and Duncker’s theories had a lot in common, so much in common that Selz read Duncker’s Zur Psychologie des produktiven Denkens, and wrote on April 4, 1935, to Bahle,

    You must read Dunker’s book on the psychology of productive thinking. His terms are often confessedly translations of mine. He sticks close to me even when he claims to diverge. So apparently my whole Work, parts of it somewhat watered down, is now taken over by the Berliners. On the whole, he has behaved fairly, but did not send the book to me. (See Simon 1999, p. 9)

    Though Selz felt Duncker’s theory was much closer to his theory than he claims, he thought Duncker was fair in quoting this work appropriately. In fact Selz had the second highest reference in Duncker’s book, only next to his mentor Köhler.

  12. Newell, in 1945, as a freshman at Stanford University attended Polya’s Mathematical methods in physical science—“[t]he course turned out to be Polya’s How to Solve It course”, and later recollects that Polya surely influenced him in all his early work (see Newell 1981, p. 2).

  13. Polya in his How to Solve It book “wishes to acknowledge his indebtedness and express his gratitude to a few modern authors, not quoted in the article on HEURISTIC. They are the physicist and philosopher Ernst Mach, the mathematician Jacques Hadamard, the psychologists William James and Wolfgang Köhler. He wishes also to quote the psychologist K. Duncker and the mathematician F. Krauss whose work (published after his own research was fairly advanced, and partly published) shows certain parallel remarks.” (1945: pp. 122–23)

  14. It is important to trace and understand the roots but it is more important to move forward as well. For which, one heuristic that has been of the first importance to Simon’s work which he enthusiastically recommends is,

    [t]o make interesting scientific discoveries, you should acquire as many good friends as possible, who are energetic, intelligent, and knowledgeable as they can be. Form partnerships with them whenever you can. Then sit back and relax. You will find that all the programs you need are stored in your friends, and will execute productively and creatively as long as you don’t interfere too much. Simon (1991, p. 387).

References

  • Bühler, K. (1907). Tatsachen und Probleme zu einer Psychologie der Denkvorgänge. Über Gedanken. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie 9.

  • de Groot, A. (1978). Thought and Choice in Chess, (2nd ed.). Mouton: The Hague. Translated from Htt Denken van den Schaker. Amsterdam, Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers Maatschappij, 1946. Especially Chapter 2, pp. 33–76.

  • Duncker, K. (1926). A qualitative (experimental and theoretical) study of productive thinking (solving of comprehensible problems). Pedagogical Seminary and Journal of Genetic Psychology, 33, 642–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncker, K. (1935). Zur Psychologie des productive Denkens. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncker, K.. (1945). On problem-solving, Psychological Monographs 58 (Whole No. 270), 5. Translated from Zur Psychologie des produktiven Denkens. Berlin: Julius Springer, 1935 (Trans. by L. S. Lees).

  • Hoffmann, J., Stock, A., & Deutsch, R. (1996). The Wurzburg School. In J. Hoffmann & A. Sebald (Eds.), Cognitive psychology in Europe: Proceedings of the ninth conference of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology (pp. 147–172). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, G. (1951). Thinking. Especially Chapter V, The work of Selz, pp. 132–149. London: Wiley.

  • Köhler, W. (1927). The mentality of apes, transl. from the 2nd German edition by Ella Winter. London: Kegan, Trench and New York: Harcourt, Brace and World. Original was Intelligenzprüfungen an Anthropoiden, Berlin (1917).

  • Külpe, O. (1912). Vorlesungen über Psychologic. Über die moderne Psychologic des Denkens (2nd ed.). Leipzig: Hirzel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, J., & Mandler, G. (1964). Thinking: From association to Gestalt. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messer, A. (1914). Husserls Phänomenologie in ihrem Verhältnis zur Psychologie. (Zweiter ufsau). Archiv fur die gesamte Philosophie, 32, 52–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. (1967). Without Benefit of Computer. Book review of Thought and Choice in Chess. Science, 156(3776), 803–804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. (1980). Duncker on thinking: An inquiry into progress in cognition. Unpublished draft manuscript.

  • Newell, A. (1981). The heuristic of George Polya and its relation to artificial intelligence. Unpublished draft manuscript.

  • Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Elements of a theory of human problem solving. Psychological Review, 65, 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selz, O. (1913). Über die Gesetze des geordneten Denkverlaufs (On the laws of the ordered thought process). Stuttgart: Spemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selz, O. (1922). Zur Pyschologie des produktiven Denkens und des Irrtums. Bonn: Cohen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selz, O. (1924). Die Gesetze der produktiven und reproduktiven Geistestätigkeit. Bonn: Cohen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selz, O. (1927 [1964]) The revision of the fundamental conceptions of the intellectual processes. In J. M. Mandler & G. Mandler (Eds.), Thinking: From association to Gestalt. Translated from Die Umgestaltung der Grundanschauungen vom intellectuellen Geschehen, Kantstudien (Vol. 32, pp. 273–289). New York: Wiley.

  • Simon, H. A. (1981). Otto Selz and information-processing psychology. In N. H. Frijda & A. de Groot (Eds.), Otto Selz: His contribution to psychology. The Hague: Mouton Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1991). Models of my life. New York: Basic Books, Inc. Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1997). Allen Newell, Biographical memoirs. United States National Academy of Sciences. Retrieved April 1, 2017.

  • Simon, H. A. (1999). Karl Duncker and cognitive science, from past to future. The Drama of Karl Duncker, 1(2), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. (1988). Foundations of Gestalt theory. Munich: Philosophia Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titchener, E. B. (1921). Brentano and Wundt: Empirical and experimental psychology. The American Journal of Psychology, 32(1), 108–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Aster, E. (1908). Die psychologische Beobachtung und experimentelle Untersuchung von Denkvorgängen. Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane, I: Zeitschriftfür Psychologie, 49, 56–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Ehrenfels, C. (1890). Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie. Über Gestaltqualitäten, 14, 249–292. (English: On the Qualities of Form, 1890).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, M. (1912). Experimentelle Studien über das Sehen von Bewegung [Experimental studies on motion vision]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 61(1), 161–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, M. (1945). Productive thinking. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dharmaraj Navaneethakrishnan.

Additional information

I’m ever thankful to my mentor, and dear friend, Prof. K. Vela Velupillai for inspiring and guiding me through various aspects of this paper—including the central idea! Alas, even he is not responsible for the remaining mistakes and infelicities in the paper, which is all mine.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Navaneethakrishnan, D. Human Problem-Solving: Standing on the Shoulders of the Giants. Comput Econ 57, 857–868 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-018-9797-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-018-9797-6

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation