Estimation of Overall Returns to Scale (RTS) of a Frontier Unit Using the Left and Right RTS

  • Mostafa Omidi
  • Mohsen Rostamy-Malkhalifeh
  • Ali Payan
  • Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi
Article
  • 39 Downloads

Abstract

This paper introduces a proposed method for identifying the left and right Returns to Scales (RTS) and the overall RTS of frontier units based on the theoretical framework of data envelopment analysis (DEA). This paper first proposes an alternative definition for Left RTS (L-RTS) and Right RTS (R-RTS) of frontier units and then by focusing on this definition, provides two new DEA models to present a proposed method for identifying the L-RTS and R-RTS of frontier units. The major advantages of these two models include that they are feasible in all situations. Also, these models are capable to properly and accurately identify frontier units and their type of L-RTS and R-RTS, without any plurality in their judgment. The proposed method is compared -theoretically and experimentally- with other methods presented in the literature. Moreover, the theoretical correlation between the concepts of overall RTS and L&R-RTS of frontier units is analyzed. Then, this analysis is used to propose an alternative method for categorizing overall RTS of frontier units. Experimental application of this method shows that the results of evaluation of overall RTS of frontier units obtained by the proposed method is completely consistent with the results of the method presented by Banker and Thrall (Eur J Oper Res 62(1):74–84, 1992). The proposed methods in this paper can be easily used by the existing codes of DEA.

Keywords

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) Frontier unit Returns to scale (RTS) Left RTS (L-RTS) Right RTS (R-RTS) 

References

  1. Allahyar, M., & Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M. (2014). An improved approach for estimating returns to scale in DEA. Bulletin of the Malaysian Mathematical Sciences Society, 37(4), 1185–1194. (2),Google Scholar
  2. Banker, R. D. (1984). Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 17, 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banker, R. D., Chang, H., & Cooper, W. W. (1996). Equivalence and implementation of alternative methods for determining returns to scale in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 89, 473–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30, 1078–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banker, R. D., Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., Thrall, R. M., & Zhu, J. (2004). Returns to scale in different DEA models. European Journal of Operational Research, 154, 345–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banker, R. D., & Thrall, R. M. (1992). Estimation of returns to scale using data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 62(1), 74–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Byrnes, P., Fare, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1984). Measuring productive efficiency: An application to Illinois strip mines. Management Science, 23, 671–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Li, S. (1989). Using DEA to evaluate relative efficiencies in the economic performance of Chinese key cities. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 23, 325344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eslami, R., & Khoveyni, M. (2013). Right and left returns to scales in data envelopment analysis: Determining type and measuring value. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 65, 500–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fare, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1994). Estimation of returns to scale using data envelopment analysis: A comment. Journal of Operational Research, 79, 379–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., & Lovell, C. A. K. (1985). The measurement of efficiency of production. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Golany, B., & Yu, G. (1997). Estimating returns to scale in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 103(1), 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hadjicostas, P., & Soteriou, A. C. (2006). One-sided elasticities and technical efficiency in multi-output production: A theoretical framework. European Journal of Operational Research, 168(2), 425–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jahanshahloo, G. R., & Soleimani-Damaneh, M. (2004). Estimating returns-to-scale in data envelopment analysis: A new procedure. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 150(1), 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (1999). An investigation of returns to scale in data envelopment analysis. Omega, 27, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Soleimani-Damaneh, M., Jahanshahloo, G. R., Mehrabian, S., & Hasannasab, M. (2010). Returns to scale and scale elasticity in the presence of weight restrictions and alternative solutions. Knowledge Based Systems, 23(2), 86–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tone, K. (1996). A simple characterization of returns to scale in DEA. Journal of Operations Research Society of Japan, 39(4), 604–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zhu, J. (1996). DEA/AR analysis of the 1988–1989 performance of the Nanjing Textiles Corporation. The Annals of Operations Research, 66, 311335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhu, J., & Shen, Z. H. (1995). A discussion of testing DMUs’ returns to scale. European Journal of Operational Research, 81, 590–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mostafa Omidi
    • 1
  • Mohsen Rostamy-Malkhalifeh
    • 1
  • Ali Payan
    • 2
  • Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics, Science and Research BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics, Zahedan BranchIslamic Azad UniversityZahedanIran

Personalised recommendations