Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis of China’s Regional Eco-efficiency: A DEA Two-stage Network Approach with Equitable Efficiency Decomposition

  • Published:
Computational Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increased concern over environmental pollution issues in China has caused eco-efficiency analysis to become a hot research topic. This study focuses on the eco-efficiency analysis of Chinese provincial-level regions, regarding each region as a two-stage network structure. The first stage is characterized as the production system and the second stage as the pollution control system. Regarding the pollution emissions as intermediate products, a two-stage data envelopment analysis model is proposed to obtain the eco-efficiency of the whole two-stage system. To measure efficiencies for the two sub-stages in each system, an equitable efficiency decomposition model and an algorithm are provided. Next, an empirical study of regional eco-efficiency analysis of 30 Chinese regions reveals that in 2013 the majority of these regions in China had poor ecological performance. Further, four categories of regions are identified by analyzing the efficiencies of each region’s two sub-stages and some suggestions are provided to improve the eco-efficiencies of regions in each category. Additionally, analysis of regional disparities in eco-efficiency shows that in China the average eco-efficiency of the eastern area is higher than those of the central and western areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amirteimoori, A. (2013). A DEA two-stage decision processes with shared resources. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 21(1), 141–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avadí, Á., Vázquez-Rowe, I., & Fréon, P. (2014). Eco-efficiency assessment of the Peruvian anchoveta steel and wooden fleets using the LCA+ DEA framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 70, 118–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bi, G. B., Song, W., Zhou, P., & Liang, L. (2014). Does environmental regulation affect energy efficiency in China’s thermal power generation? Empirical evidence from a slacks-based DEA model. Energy Policy, 66, 537–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bian, Y., & Yang, F. (2010). Resource and environment efficiency analysis of provinces in China: A DEA approach based on Shannon’s entropy. Energy Policy, 38(4), 1909–1917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1962). Programming with linear fractional functionals. Naval Research logistics quarterly, 9(3-4), 181–186.

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(4), 429–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y. T., Zhang, N., Danao, D., & Zhang, N. (2013). Environmental efficiency analysis of transportation system in China: A non-radial DEA approach. Energy policy, 58, 277–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., Li, N., & Zhu, J. (2009). Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(3), 1170–1176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Du, J., David Sherman, H., & Zhu, J. (2010). DEA model with shared resources and efficiency decomposition. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(1), 339–349.

  • Cook, W. D., Liang, L., Zha, Y., & Zhu, J. (2009). A modified super-efficiency DEA model for infeasibility. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60(2), 276–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, W. D., Harrison, J., Imanirad, R., Rouse, P., & Zhu, J. (2013). Data envelopment analysis with nonhomogeneous DMUs. Operations Research, 61(3), 666–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, C., & Li, J. (2014). Analysis over factors of innovation in China’s fast economic growth since its beginning of reform and opening up. AI & Society, 29(3), 377–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, R. G., & Thanassoulis, E. (1988). Reducing weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 39(6), 563–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyckhoff, H., & Allen, K. (2001). Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA). European Journal of Operational Research, 132(2), 312–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emrouznejad, A., Banker, R., Lopes, A. L. M., & de Almeida, M. R. (2014). Data envelopment analysis in the public sector. Socio-economic Planning Sciences, 48(1), 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatami-Marbini, A., Tavana, M., Agrell, P. J., Lotfi, F. H., & Beigi, Z. G. (2015). A common-weights DEA model for centralized resource reduction and target setting. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 79, 195–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halkos, G. E., Tzeremes, N. G., & Kourtzidis, S. A. (2014). A unified classification of two-stage DEAmodels. Surveys in Operations Research and Management Science, 19(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Sancho, F., Molinos-Senante, M., & Sala-Garrido, R. (2011). Energy efficiency in Spanish wastewater treatment plants: A non-radial DEA approach. Science of the Total Environment, 409(14), 2693–2699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, J. L., & Wang, S. C. (2006). Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China. Energy Policy, 34(17), 3206–3217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hua, Z., Bian, Y., & Liang, L. (2007). Eco-efficiency analysis of paper mills along the Huai River: An extended DEA approach. Omega, 35(5), 578–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C., & Hwang, S. N. (2008). Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research, 185(1), 418–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen, P. J., & Luptacik, M. (2004). Eco-efficiency analysis of power plants: An extension of data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 154(2), 437–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Chen, Y., Liang, L., & Xie, J. (2012). DEA models for extended two-stage network structures. Omega, 40(5), 611–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Lei, X., Dai, Q., & Liang, L. (2015). Performance evaluation of participating nations at the 2012 London Summer Olympics by a two-stage data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 243(3), 964–973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, L., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2008). DEA models for two-stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 55(7), 643–653.

  • Lozano, S. (2015). Technical and environmental efficiency of a two-stage production and abatement system. Annals of Operations Research, 27(2), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzo-Toja, Y., Vázquez-Rowe, I., Chenel, S., Marín-Navarro, D., Moreira, M. T., & Feijoo, G. (2015). Eco-efficiency analysis of Spanish WWTPs using the LCA+ DEA method. Water Research, 68, 651–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picazo-Tadeo, A. J., Gómez-Limón, J. A., & Reig-Martínez, E. (2011). Assessing farming eco-efficiency: A data envelopment analysis approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(4), 1154–1164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picazo-Tadeo, A. J., Beltrán-Esteve, M., & Gómez-Limón, J. A. (2012). Assessing eco-efficiency with directional distance functions. European Journal of Operational Research, 220(3), 798–809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, G. M., Bi, J., & Wang, J. N. (2010). Chinese regional industrial energy efficiency evaluation based on a DEA model of fixing non-energy inputs. Energy Policy, 38(10), 6172–6179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S. (1996). Corporate environmental accounting. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, M., An, Q., Zhang, W., Wang, Z., & Wu, J. (2012). Environmental efficiency evaluation based on data envelopment analysis: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(7), 4465–4469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, K., Yu, S., & Zhang, W. (2013a). China’s regional energy and environmental efficiency: A DEA window analysis based dynamic evaluation. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 58(5), 1117–1127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, K., Wei, Y. M., & Zhang, X. (2013b). Energy and emissions efficiency patterns of Chinese regions: A multi-directional efficiency analysis. Applied Energy, 104, 105–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, K., Lu, B., & Wei, Y. M. (2013c). China’s regional energy and environmental efficiency: A range-adjusted measure based analysis. Applied Energy, 112, 1403–1415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, A. H., Cao, Y. Y., & Liu, B. (2014). Energy efficiency evaluation for regions in China: An application of DEA and Malmquist indices. Energy Efficiency, 7(3), 429–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Chu, J., Sun, J., & Zhu, Q. (2016). DEA cross-efficiency evaluation based on Pareto improvement. European Journal of Operational Research, 248(2), 571–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Lv, L., Sun, J., & Ji, X. (2015a). A comprehensive analysis of China’s regional energy saving and emission reduction efficiency: From production and treatment perspectives. Energy Policy, 84, 166–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Zhu, Q., Chu, J., & Liang, L. (2015b). Two-stage network structures with undesirable intermediate outputs reused: A DEA based approach. Computational Economics, 46(3), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Chu, J. F., & Liang, L. (2015c). Target setting and allocation of carbon emissions abatement based on DEA and closest target: An application to 20 APEC economies. Natural Hazards, 42(3), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Zhu, Q., Chu, J., Liu, H., & Liang, L. (2015d). Measuring energy and environmental efficiency of transportation systems in China based on a parallel DEA approach. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 160(1), 144–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Xiong, B., An, Q., Sun, J., & Wu, H. (2015e). Total-factor energy efficiency evaluation of Chinese industry by using two-stage DEA model with shared inputs. Annals of Operations Research, 2(6), 429–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, B. C., Shang, L. F., Yang, S. B., & Yi, B. W. (2014). Dynamic environmental efficiency evaluation of electric power industries: Evidence from OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) and BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) countries. Energy, 74, 147–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M., Li, Y., Chen, Y., & Liang, L. (2014). An equilibrium efficiency frontier data envelopment analysis approach for evaluating decision-making units with fixed-sum outputs. European Journal of Operational Research, 239(2), 479–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, L., Ouyang, H., Fang, K., Ye, L., & Zhang, J. (2015). Evaluation of regional environmental efficiencies in China based on super-efficiency-DEA. Ecological Indicators, 51, 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, J., Zhao, C., Yu, S., & Hu, Z. (2007). Electricity consumption and economic growth in China: Cointegration and co-feature analysis. Energy Economics, 29(6), 1179–1191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X. P., Cheng, X. M., Yuan, J. H., & Gao, X. J. (2011). Total-factor energy efficiency in developing countries. Energy Policy, 39(2), 644–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., & Poh, K. L. (2008). Measuring environmental performance under different environmental DEA technologies. Energy Economics, 30(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research is supported by National Natural Science Funds of China (No. 71222106, 71110107024, and 71501189), Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (No.20133402110028), Foundation for the Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of P. R. China (No. 201279), The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. WK2040160008), and Top-Notch Young Talents Program of China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, Anhui, People’s Republic of China

    Junfei Chu, Jie Wu, Qingyuan Zhu & Beibei Xiong

  2. School of Business, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, Hunan, People’s Republic of China

    Qingxian An

Authors
  1. Junfei Chu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jie Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qingyuan Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qingxian An
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Beibei Xiong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jie Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chu, J., Wu, J., Zhu, Q. et al. Analysis of China’s Regional Eco-efficiency: A DEA Two-stage Network Approach with Equitable Efficiency Decomposition. Comput Econ 54, 1263–1285 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-015-9558-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-015-9558-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation