Abstract
We establish the standard procedures in solving a class of dynamic stochastic general equilibrium models with a second-order approximation to the policy function. The innovation is that the means of exogenous shocks vary with the variances. The numerical results show that second-order perturbation methods generate large approximation errors regarding to the responses of policy functions to shocks.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burnside C. (1998) Solving asset pricing models with gaussian shocks. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 22(3): 329–340
Collard F., Juillard M. (2001) Accuracy of stochastic perturbation methods: The case of asset pricing models. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 25(6–7): 979–999
Fuchs-Schündeln N. (2008) The response of household saving to the large shock of german reunification. American Economic Review 98(5): 1798–1828
Imrohoruglu A. (1989) Cost of business cycles with indivisibilities and liquidity constraints. Journal of Political Economy 97(6): 83–1364
Judd K. L. (1998) Numerical methods in economics. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Krusell P., Smith A. A. (1999) On the welfare effects of eliminating business cycles. Review of Economic Dynamics 2(1): 245–272
Lucas R. J. (1987) Models of business cycles. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, England
Schmitt-Grohé S., Uribe M. (2004) Solving dynamic general equilibrium models using a second-order approximation to the policy function. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 28: 755–775
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, X., Cui, Z. Approximation Errors of Perturbation Methods in Solving a Class of Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Models. Comput Econ 38, 107–128 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-011-9265-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-011-9265-z