Skip to main content
Log in

Finite Elements in the Presence of Occasionally Binding Constraints

  • Published:
Computational Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes and compares in terms of speed and accuracy two alternative approximation methods employing finite elements to parameterize the true policy functions that solve for the equilibrium of an optimal growth model with leisure and irreversible investment. The occasionally binding constraint in investment is efficiently handled on one algorithm by parameterizing the expectations of the marginal benefit of future physical capital stock and on the other by modifying the planner’s problem to include a penalty function. While both methods benefit from the high speed and accuracy achieved by a finite elements approximation, the algorithm incorporating a penalty function in the planner’s problem proved being of fastest convergence over a whole range of the model’s calibrations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiyagari R. (1994) Uninsured idiosyncratic risk and aggregate saving. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109(3): 659–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aruoba S., Rubio J., Fernandez-Villaverde J. (2006) Comparing solution methods for dynamic equilibrium economies. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 30: 2477–2508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiano L., Fisher J. (2000) Algorithms for solving dynamic models with occasionally binding constraints. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 24: 1179–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collard F., Juillard M. (2001) Accuracy of stochastic perturbation methods: the case of asset pricing models. Journal of Economic Dynamics And Control 25(6): 979–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Den Haan W. J., Marcet A. (1994) Accuracy in simulations. Review of Economic Studies 61: 3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher R. (1987) Practical methods of optimization. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen G. (1985) Indivisible labor and the business cycle. Journal of Monetary Economics 16: 309–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodrick R., Kocherlakota N., Lucas D. (1991) The variability of velocity in cash-in-advance models. Journal of Political Economics 99: 358–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes T. R. J. (2000) The finite element method, linear static and dynamic finite element analysis. Dover Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Huggett M. (1993) The risk-free rate in heterogeneous agent incomplete insurance economies. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 17: 953–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judd K.L. (1992) Projection methods for solving aggregate growth models. Journal of Economic Theory 58: 410–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judd K. L. (1998) Numerical methods in economics. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd K. L., Guu S. M. (1997) Asymptotic methods for aggregate growth models. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 21: 1025–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrattan E. (1996) Solving the stochastic growth model with a finite element method. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 20: 19–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrattan E. (1999) Application of weighted residual methods to dynamic economic models. In: Marimon R., Scott A. (eds) Computational methods for the study of dynamic economies. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor J.B., Uhlig H. (1990) Solving nonlinear stochastic growth models: A comparison of alternative solution methods. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 8: 1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen Y. (2005) Understanding the inventory cycle. Journal of Monetary Economics 52: 1533–1555

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José J. Cao-Alvira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cao-Alvira, J.J. Finite Elements in the Presence of Occasionally Binding Constraints. Comput Econ 35, 355–370 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-010-9203-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-010-9203-5

Keywords

Navigation