Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling Emotions and Reason in Agent-Based Systems

  • Published:
Computational Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We analyze how to develop an agent-based system in which agents evolve co-evolutionary endogenous rules of behavior by using best response and emotions. We show that best response is not sufficient to define complete and consistent rules of behavior and we prove that the use of emotions, which complement reason, is necessary to learn rules of behavior. We model four different emotions (apathy, patience, anger and confidence) which enable the agent to deal with the rewards and with others. We propose an algorithm to model automata-based systems incorporating rationality and emotions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Ashrat N., Camerer C.F., Loewenstein G. (2005) Adam Smith, Behavioral Economist. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19(3): 131–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks J.S., Sundaram R.K. (1990) Repeated games, finite automata, and complexity. Games and Economic Behavior 2: 97–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, J. (1994, July). The role of emotion in believable agents. Communications of the ACM. Special issue on agents.

  • Bazzan A.L., Bordini R.H., Campbell J.A. (2002) Evolution of agents with moral sentiments in an iterated prisoner’s Dilemma exercise. In: Parsons S., Gmytrasiewicz P.J., Wooldridge M. (eds) Game theory and decision theory in agent-based systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 43–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Botelho L., Coelho H. (2001) Machinery for artificial emotions. Journal of Cybernetics and Systems 32(5): 465–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breazeal C. (2002) Designing sociable robots. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra C.M. (2004) Mood-driven behavior in strategic interactions. American Economic Review 94(2): 367–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmel D., Markovitch S. (1998) Pruning algorithms for multi-model adversary search. Artificial Intelligence 99(2): 325–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, J. W., & Goodrich, M. A. (2004). Multiagent learning during on-going human-machine interactions: The role of reputation. In AAAI spring symposium: Interaction between humans and autonomous systems over extended operation. http://www.mit.edu/~jcrandal/.

  • Damasio A.R. (1994) Descartes error—emotion, reason and the human brain. Gosset/Putnam Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler K., Bless H. (2000) The interface of affective and cognitive processes. In: Frijda N.H., Manstead A.S., Bem S. (eds) Emotions and beliefs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Frijda N., Swagerman J. (1987) Can computers feel? Theory and design of an emotional model. Cognition and Emotion 1(3): 235–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa I. (1988) The complexity of computing best-response automata in repeated games. Journal of Economic Theory 45: 342–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gmytrasiewicz P.J., Lisetti C.L. (2002) Emotions and personality in agent design and modeling. In: Parsons S., Gmytrasiewicz P.J., Wooldridge M. (eds) Game theory and decision theory in agent-based systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 81–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopcroft J.E., Ullman J.D. (1979) Introduction to automata theory, languages and computation. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus R.S. (1991) Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinier, R., & Laird, J. (2004). Toward a comprehensive computational model of emotions and feelings. In Proceedings of sixth international conference on cognitive modeling (pp. 172–177). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Murphy R.R., Lisetti C.L., Tardif R., Irish L., Gage A. (2002) Emotion-based control of cooperating heterogeneous mobile robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 18(5): 744–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, A. E., Zukerman, I., & Oliver, C. D. (1998). Towards a society of affect-driven agents. In Proceedings of the 20th cognitive science society, Madison, WI.

  • Oliveira, F. S. (2009). Limitations of learning in automata-based systems. European Journal of Operational Research. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.08.018.

  • Picard R.W. (2000) Affective computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozanski M., Thagard P. (2005) Changing personalities: Towards realistic virtual characters. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 17(3): 221–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosati A.G., Stevens J.R., Hare B., Hauser M.D. (2007) The evolutionary origins of human patience: Temporal preferences in chimpanzees, bonobos, and human adults. Current Biology 17(19): 1663–1668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothovius, T. (2007). Analyst self-confidence and forecast rationality. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=967419. Retrieved 1 Feb 2007.

  • Weld D. (1999) Recent advances in AI planning. AI Magazine 20(2): 93–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Zizzo, D. J. (2003). Anger, rationality and neuroeconomics. Discussion paper series, no. 182. Department of Economics, Oxford. http://www.economics.ox.ac.uk/Research/wp/pdf/paper182.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernando S. Oliveira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oliveira, F.S. Modeling Emotions and Reason in Agent-Based Systems. Comput Econ 35, 155–164 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-009-9188-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-009-9188-0

Keywords

Navigation