Skip to main content
Log in

Tests of Random Walk: A Comparison of Bootstrap Approaches

  • Published:
Computational Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper compares different versions of the multiple variance ratio test based on bootstrap techniques for the construction of empirical distributions. It also analyzes the crucial issue of selecting optimal block sizes when block bootstrap procedures are used. The comparison of the different approaches using Monte Carlo simulations leads to the conclusion that methodologies using block bootstrap methods present better performance for the construction of empirical distributions of the variance ratio test. Moreover, the results are highly sensitive to methods employed to test the null hypothesis of random walk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin M. Tabak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lima, E.J.A., Tabak, B.M. Tests of Random Walk: A Comparison of Bootstrap Approaches. Comput Econ 34, 365–382 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-009-9180-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-009-9180-8

Keywords

Navigation