Advertisement

Computational Economics

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 31–46 | Cite as

Shocks and Endogenous Institutions: An Agent-based Model of Labor Market Performance in Turbulent Times

  • Christian W. Martin
  • Michael NeugartEmail author
Article

Abstract

We develop an agent-based model of labor market regulation to study the consequences of employment protection legislations for labor market performance. Unlike most of the existing studies of labor market regulation we endogenize the institutional setting. Workers cast their vote on labor market regulation depending on the past payoffs that they accrued when one of two competing parties with different labor market policy platforms was in power. We identify important interactions with exogenous shocks. In more turbulent economic times, employment protection systems can affect labor market performance for some periods even after the shock has subsided.

Keywords

Agent-based model Labor market institutions Voting Employment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker, D., Glyn, A., Howell, D., & Schmitt, J. (2005). Labor market institutions and unemployment: A critical assessment of the cross-country evidence. In Fighting unemployment—the limits of the free market orthodoxy (pp. 72–113). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Belot M., van Ours J. (2004) Does the recent success of some OECD countries in lowering their unemployment rates lie in the clever design of their labor market reforms?. Oxford Economic Papers 56: 621–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertola, G., Blau, F., & Kahn, L. (2002). Comparative analysis of labour market outcomes: Lessons for the U.S. from international long-run evidence. In A. Krueger & R. Solow (Eds.), The roaring nineties: Can full employment be sustained? (pp. 159–218). Russell Sage and Century Foundations.Google Scholar
  4. Bewley T. (1999) Why wages don’t fall during a recession. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanchard O., Portugal P. (2001) What hides behind an unemployment rate: Comparing Portuguese and US labor markets. American Economic Review 90: 187–207Google Scholar
  6. Blanchard O., Wolfers J. (2000) Shocks and institutions and the rise of European unemployment: The aggregate evidence. The Economic Journal 110: 1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elmeskov J., Martin J., Scarpetta S. (1998) Key lessons for labour market reforms: Evidence from OECD countries’ experience. Swedish Economic Policy Review 5: 205–252Google Scholar
  8. Fagiolo G., Dosi G., Gabriele R. (2004) Matching, bargaining, and wage setting in an evolutionary model of labor market and output dynamics. Advances in Complex Systems 7: 157–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fowler J., Smirnov O. (2005) Dynamic parties and social turnout: An agent-based model. American Journal of Sociology 110: 1070–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Freeman, R. (2005). Labour market institutions without blinders: The debate over flexibility and labour market performance. NBER Working Paper 11286.Google Scholar
  11. Garibaldi P. (1999) Job flow dynamics and firing restrictions. European Economic Review 42: 245–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heckman, J., & Pages, C. (2000). The cost of job security regulation: Evidence from Latin American labour markets. NBER Working Paper 7773.Google Scholar
  13. Hümmerich, K. (1999). Die arbeitsgerichtliche Abfindung—Ein Beitrag zur Abfindungspraxis und zur gesetzlichen Neuregelung. Neue Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht, 342–358.Google Scholar
  14. Kollman K., Miller J., Page S. (1997) Political institutions and sorting in a Tiebout Model. American Economic Review 87: 977–992Google Scholar
  15. Lazear E. (1990) Job security provisions and unemployment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 55: 699–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lindbeck A., Weibull J. (1987) Balanced-budget redistribution as the outcome of political competition. Public Choice 51: 272–297Google Scholar
  17. Martin C., Plümper T. (2005) Number of parties, endogenous partisan preferences, and electoral turnout rates: A stochastic equilibrium analysis. Social Science Computer Review 23: 347–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mortensen D., Pissarides C. (1999) Unemployment responses to ‘skill biased’ technology shocks: The role of role of labour market policy. The Economic Journal 109: 242–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mueller, D. (2003). Public choice III. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Neugart M. (2004) Endogenous matching functions: An agent-based computational approach. Advances in Complex Systems 7: 187–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Neugart M. (2008) Labor market policy evaluation with ACE. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 67: 418–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nickell S. (1997) Unemployment and labour market rigidities: Europe versus North America. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11: 55–74Google Scholar
  23. Nickell S., Nunziata L., Ochel W. (2005) Unemployment in the OECD since the 1960s: What do we know?. The Economic Journal 115: 1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. OECD. (2004). OECD Employment Outlook.Google Scholar
  25. Oswald A. (1985) The economic theory of trade unions: An introductory survey. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 87: 160–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2002). Political economics: Explaining economic policy. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Pingle, M., & Tesfatsion, L. (2003). Evolution of worker-employer networks and behaviors under alternative unemployment benefits: An agent-based computational study. In A. Nagurney (Ed.), Innovations in economic and financial networks (pp. 256–285). Edward Elgar Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Richiardi M. (2006) Toward a non-equilibrium unemployment theory. Computational Economics 27: 135–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tesfatsion L. (2001a) Introduction to the special issue on agent-based computational economics. Computational Economics 18: 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tesfatsion L. (2001b) Structure, behavior and market power in an evolutionary labor market with adaptive search. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 25: 281–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tesfatsion, L. (2006). Agent-based computational economics: A constructive approach to economic theory. In K. Judd & L. Tesfatsion (Eds.), Handbook of computational economics (Vol. 2). North-Holland.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Globalisation and GovernanceUniversität HamburgHamburgGermany
  2. 2.School of Economics and ManagementFree University of Bozen/BolzanoBozenItaly

Personalised recommendations