Advertisement

Critical Criminology

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 611–630 | Cite as

The Profits of Recognition: A Praxeological Approach to Corporate Crime

  • Steven Bittle
  • Jon Frauley
Article

Abstract

This paper offers a methodological intervention into the study and understanding of regulation and compliance with respect to corporate crime. We advocate Pierre Bourdieu’s “praxeological” sociology as the bases for what we hold is an innovative model of regulation and compliance. The praxeological or relational approach offers structural analyses that take seriously the constructivist fixation with meaning, subjectivity, and perception without succumbing to the limitations of an interactionist conception of power. We first show theoretical affinities between the work of Pierre Bourdieu and Louis Althusser in order to highlight their shared concern with subject formation and their respective conceptions of “mis/recognition”. As this provides us with the theoretical basis of a more robust theory of regulation and compliance than is commonly found within the corporate crime literature, we argue that studies of corporate wrongdoing would benefit from rethinking the conceptions of compliance that currently shape corporate crime scholarship. We then demonstrate the benefits of this praxeological approach to regulation and compliance through discussion of the state’s efforts to discipline corporations through criminal law in Canada and the United Kingdom.

References

  1. Althusser, L. (1969). Lenin and philosophy. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
  2. Alvesalo-Kuusi, A., Bittle, S., & Lahteenmaki, L. (2017). Repositioning the corporate criminal: Comparing and contrasting corporate criminal liability in Canada and Finland. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 42(2–3), 215–231.Google Scholar
  3. Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive regulation: Transcending the deregulation debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bittle, S. (2012). Still dying for a living: Corporate criminal liability after the westray mine disaster. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bittle, S. (2013). Cracking down on corporate crime? The disappearance of corporate criminal liability legislation in Canada. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, 11(2), 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bittle, S., & Snider, L. (2006). From manslaughter to preventable accident: Shaping corporate criminal liability. Law and Policy, 28(4), 470–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1967). Systems of education and systems of thought. Social Science Journal, 19(3), 338–358.Google Scholar
  8. Bourdieu, P. (1973). The three forms of theoretical knowledge. Social Science Information, 12(1), 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1986). Forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1987a). The force of law: Toward a sociology of the juridical field. Hastings Law Journal, 38, 814–853.Google Scholar
  12. Bourdieu, P. (1987b). What makes a social class? On the theoretical and practical existence of groups. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 32, 1–17.Google Scholar
  13. Bourdieu, P. (1990a). In other words: Essays towards a reflexive sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bourdieu, P. (1990b). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  16. Bourdieu, P. (1992). Doxa and common life: In conversation with Terry Eagleton. New Left Review, 191, 111–121.Google Scholar
  17. Bourdieu, P. (1994). Rethinking the state: Genesis and structure of the bureaucratic field. Sociological Theory, 12(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bourdieu, P. (1996). The state nobility: Elite schools in the field of power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Braithwaite, J. (1982). Enforced self regulation: A new strategy for corporate crime control. Michigan Law Review, 80, 1466–1507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Braithwaite, J., & Fisse, B. (1985). Varieties of responsibility and organisational crime. Law and Policy, 7, 315–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Braithwaite, J., & Fisse, B. (1987). Self regulation and the control of corporate crime. In C. Shearing & P. Stenning (Eds.), Private policing. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Canadian Dredge and Dock Co. v. The Queen [1985] 1 S.C.R. 662.Google Scholar
  25. Comack, E. (Ed.). (2014). Locating law: Race/class/gender connections (2nd ed.). Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 (c.19). Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/19/contents. Accessed 2 June 2018.
  27. Cotterrell, R. (1995). Law’s community: Legal theory in sociological perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Davis, C. (2001). Althusser on reading and self-reading. Textual Practice, 15(2), 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. De Sousa Santos, B. (1987). Law: A map of misreading. Toward a postmodern conception of law. Journal of Law and Society, 14(3), 279–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Drake, D., Muncie, J., & Westmarland, L. (2010). Criminal justice: Local and global. Devon: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  31. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  32. Frauley, J. (2012). Post-social politics, employability, and the security effects of higher education. Journal of Pedagogy, 3(2), 219–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Glasbeek, H. (2002). Wealth by stealth: Corporate crime, corporate law, and the perversion of democracy. Toronto, ON: Between the Lines.Google Scholar
  34. Glasbeek, H. (2013). Missing the targets–Bill C-45: Reforming the status quo to maintain the status quo. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, 11(2), 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Glasbeek, H. (2017). Class privilege: How law shelters shareholders and coddles capitalism. Toronto, ON: Between the Lines.Google Scholar
  36. Gobert, J. (2008). The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007—Thirteen years in the making but was it worth the wait? Modern Law Review, 71(3), 413–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Haines, F. (1997). Corporate regulation: Beyond “punish or persuade”. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  38. Hermer, J., & Hunt, A. (1996). Official graffiti of the everyday. Law and Society Review, 30(3), 455–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hindess, B., & Hirst, P. (1975). Pre-capitalist modes of production. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  40. Hunt, A. (1993). Explorations in law and society: Toward a constitutive theory of law. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Hunt, A., & Wickham, G. (1994). Foucault and law: Towards a sociology of law as governance. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  42. McHoul, A. (1980). The practical methodology of reading in science and everyday life: Reading Althusser reading Marx. Philosophy of Social Science, 10, 129–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Milovanovic, D. (2011). On Evgeny B. Pashukanis, the general theory of law and marxism. In A. J. Treviño (Ed.), Classic writings in law and society. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  44. Naffine, N. (1990). The law and the sexes: Exploration in Feminist Jurisprudence. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  45. Noble, C. (1995). Regulating Work in a capitalist society. In F. Pearce & L. Snider (Eds.), Corporate crime: Contemporary debates. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  46. Norrie, A. (2001). Crime, reason and history: A critical introduction to criminal law (2nd ed.). London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
  47. Pashukanis, E. B. (1980). Law and marxism: A general theory. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  48. Pearce, F. (1976). Crimes of the powerful: Marxism, crime and deviance. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  49. Pearce, F. (1990). ‘Responsible corporations’ and regulatory agencies. Political Quarterly, 61(4), 415–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pearce, F. (1992). The contribution of ‘left realism’ to the study of commercial crime. In J. Lowman & B. MacLean (Eds.), Realist criminology: Crime control and policing in the 1990s. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  51. Pearce, F. (1993). Corporate rationality as corporate crime. Studies in Political Economy, 40(1), 135–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pearce, F., & Tombs, S. (1990). Ideology, hegemony, and empiricism: Compliance theories of regulation. British Journal of Criminology, 30(4), 423–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pearce, F., & Tombs, S. (1997). Hazards, law and class: Contextualizing the regulation of corporate crime. Social & Legal Studies, 6(1), 79–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pearce, F., & Tombs, S. (1998). Toxic capitalism: Corporate crime and the chemical industry. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  55. Reiman, J. (2004). The rich get richer and the poor get prison (7th ed.). London: Pearson Publishing.Google Scholar
  56. Simpson, S. (2002). Corporate crime, law and social control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Slapper, G. (2013). Justice is mocked if an important law is unenforced. Journal of Criminal Law, 77, 91–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Slapper, G., & Tombs, S. (1999). Corporate crime. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
  59. Smart, C. (1989). Feminism and the power of law. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Smart, C. (1990). Law’s power, the sexed body, and feminist discourse. Journal of Law and Society, 17(2), 194–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Snider, S. (2009). Accommodating power: The ‘common sense’ of regulators. Social & Legal Studies, 18(2), 179–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tombs, S. (2016). Social protection after the crisis: Regulation without enforcement. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  63. Tombs, S. (2017). The UK’s corporate killing law: Un/fit for purpose? Criminology & Criminal Justice.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895817725559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tombs, S., & Whyte, D. (2007). Safety crimes. Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  65. Tombs, S., & Whyte, D. (2013). The myths and realities of deterrence in workplace safety regulation. British Journal of Criminology, 2013(53), 746–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tombs, S., & Whyte, D. (2015). The corporate criminal: Why corporations must be abolished. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tucker, E. (1995). And defeat goes on: An assessment of third-wave health and safety regulation. In F. Pearce & S. Snider (Eds.), Corporate crime: Contemporary debates. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  68. Whyte, D. (2012). Between crime and ‘doxa’: Researching the worlds of state-corporate elites. State Crime Journal, 1(1), 88–108.Google Scholar
  69. Whyte, D. (2014). Regimes of permission and state-corporate crime. State-Corporate Crime, 3(2), 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Woodiwiss, A. (1990). Social theory after postmodernism: Rethinking production, law and class. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CriminologyUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations