Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Kids are Alright: Making a Case for Abolition of the Juvenile Justice System

  • Published:
Critical Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When considering abolition of the criminal justice system, there is no greater or more impactful relevance than for juveniles that find themselves inextricably linked to the juvenile justice system. From its inception, the philosophical foundation of juvenile care was to provide individualized, compassionate assistance to young men and women perceived to be in need of emotional care and/or social control. With the establishment of the Cook County Juvenile Court in 1899, the American juvenile justice system has endured a 118-year odyssey that has produced progressively rational, largely unsympathetic, and increasingly punitive practices. With happenings such as the ‘school-to-prison pipeline’, ‘juvenile life without the possibility of parole’, ‘teen courts’, and ‘deferred prosecution probation’, current juveniles that make unassuming mistakes and errors in judgment are adjoined to a system that sustains and reinforces itself through these mistakes and errors. The charge of this article is to recommend the abolition of the contemporary juvenile justice system, with safeguards for the protection from serious offenders and a return to the compassionate care that is warranted for the majority of juveniles that currently bolster the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainsworth, J. E. (1990). Re-imagining childhood and reconstructing the legal order: The case for abolishing the juvenile court. North Carolina Law Review, 69, 1083–1133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, K. (2014). Stop, children, what’s that sound? The unintended consequences of police contact on juveniles. Chicago Policy Review (Online).

  • Bernstein, R. (2011). Racial innocence: Performing American childhood from slavery to civil rights. New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, N. (2014). Burning down the house: The end of juvenile prison. New York, NY: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, S. W. (2014). The school-to-prison pipeline and the ‘death of deviance’ in the American public school system. In Michael Dwelling, Joseph Kotarba, & Nathan Pino (Eds.), The death and resurrection of deviance: Current ideas and research (pp. 192–213). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callinicos, A. T. (1999). Social theory: A historical introduction. New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, H. (2014). Police interviewing and interrogation of juvenile suspects: A descriptive examination of actual cases. Law and Human Behavior, 38(3), 271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, M., & Schept, J. (2017). Penal abolition and the state: Colonial, racial, and gender violences. Contemporary Justice Review, 20(4), 399–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, A. J. (2013). Tracing the school-to-prison pipeline from zero-tolerance policies to juvenile justice dispositions. Georgetown Law Journal, 102, 1251–1277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, B. C. (2017). The evolution of the Juvenile Court: Race, politics, and the criminalizing of juvenile justice. New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferdinand, T. N. (1991). History overtakes the juvenile justice system. Crime and Delinquency, 37(2), 204–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, B. W., & Hennessy, E. A. (2016). School resource officers and exclusionary discipline in US high schools: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Adolescent Research Review, 1(3), 217–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fogelson, R. M. (1977). Big-city police (p. 23367). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, D. (2012). Punishment and modern society: A study in social theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gase, L. N., Kuo, T., Lai, E. S., Stoll, M. A., & Ponce, N. A. (2016). The impact of two Los Angeles County Teen Courts on youth recidivism: comparing two informal probation programs. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 12(1), 105–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerth, H. H., & Mills, C. W. (1946). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldson, B. (2005). Child imprisonment: A case for abolition. Youth Justice, 5(2), 77–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goshe, S. (2015). Moving beyond the punitive legacy: Taking stock of persistent problems in juvenile justice. Youth Justice, 15(1), 42–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010).

  • Greenwood, R., & Lawrence, T. B. (2005). The iron cage in the information age: The legacy and relevance of Max Weber for organizational studies. Editorial, Organization Studies, 26(4), 493–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertzler, J. O. (1928). Social progress: A theoretical survey and analysis. New York, NY: Century Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illinois Juvenile Court Act, Ill Laws 131 (Ill. Stat. 1899).

  • In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 20 (1967).

  • Jaffe, D. (2001). Organizational theory: Tension and change. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. N. (2015). How students became criminals: The similarities between stop and frisk and school searches and the effect on delinquency rates. Boston University’s Public Interest Law Journal, 24(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juss, S. S. (2015). Recognizing refugee status for victims of trafficking and the myth of progress. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 34(2), 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, J. M., Martinez-Prather, K., & Bowman, S. W. (2016). The roles of school-based law enforcement officers and how these roles are established: A qualitative study. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 27(4), 420–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meiners, E. R. (2015). Trouble with the child in the carceral state. Social Justice, 41(3), 120–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohl, R. A. (1970). Humanitarianism in the preindustrial city: The New York Society for the Prevention of Pauperism, 1817–1823. The Journal of American History, 57(3), 576–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Na, C., & Gottfredson, D. C. (2013). Police officers in schools: Effects on school crime and the processing of offending behaviors. Justice Quarterly, 30(4), 619–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Probation Officers’ Association. (1910). Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology, 1(3), 461–463.

  • Ogletree, C. J., Jr., & Dowd, N. E. (2015). A new juvenile justice system: Total reform for a broken system. New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, R. S. (1969). House of refuge: Origins of juvenile reform in New York State, 1815–1857. New York, NY: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, A. M. (1977). The child savers: The invention of delinquency. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rademacher, E. M. (2015). Beginning of the end: Using Ohio’s plan to eliminate juvenile solitary confinement as a model for statutory elimination of juvenile solitary confinement. The William and Mary Law Review, 57, 1019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiman, J., & Leighton, P. (2015). The rich get richer and the poor get prison: Ideology, class, and criminal justice. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S.551 (2005).

  • Ryerson, E. (1978). The best laid plans: America’s juvenile justice system. New York, NY: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saleh-Hanna, V. (2008). Penal abolitionist theories and ideoloiges. In V. Saleh-Hanna (Ed.), Colonial systems of control: Criminal justice in Nigeria (pp. 417–456). Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saleh-Hanna, V. (2017). An abolitionist theory in crime: Ending the abusive relationship with racist-imperialist-patriarchy. Contemporary Justice Review, 20(4), 419–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlossman, S. (1983). The Chicago area project revisited. Crime & Delinquency, 29(3), 398–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, J. L. (1973). The cycle of juvenile court history. Crime and Delinquency, 19(4), 457–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shay, T. L. (1957). The myth of progress. The Indian Journal of Political Science, 18(1), 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, J. S., & Moore, W. E. (1987). Weber’s analysis of legal rationalization: A critique and constructive modification. Sociological Forum, 2(1), 67–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treiber, H. (2012). On Max Weber’s sociology of law, now known as the developmental conditions of the law. A review essay on MWG I/22-3: Recht. Max Weber Studies, 12(1), 121–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vose, B., & Vannan, K. (2013). A jury of your peers: Recidivism among teen court participants. Journal of Juvenile Justice, 3(1), 97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S., Spohn, C., & DeLone, M. (2018). The color of justice: Race, ethnicity, and crime in America. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, T. (2013). The myth of progress: Toward a sustainable future. Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, K., & Rozel, J. S. (2016). Mental health care of detained youth and solitary confinement and restraint within juvenile detention facilities. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 25(1), 71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott Wm. Bowman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bowman, S.W. The Kids are Alright: Making a Case for Abolition of the Juvenile Justice System. Crit Crim 26, 393–405 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-018-9402-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-018-9402-2

Navigation