Critical Criminology

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 277–294 | Cite as

Moving Full-Speed Ahead in the Wrong Direction? A Critical Examination of US Sex-Offender Policy from a Positive Sexuality Model

  • D. J. Williams
  • Jeremy N. Thomas
  • Emily E. Prior
Article

Abstract

Despite an extensive research literature on sexual offending, much of current sexual offender policy within the United States runs counter to such literature, and instead, is based on common, pervasive myths about sexual offenders. Not surprisingly, recent studies on sex offender policy effectiveness suggest that current approaches are both costly and largely ineffective. In this paper, we suggest that a longstanding socio-cultural climate of sex-negativity fuels common fears and misconceptions about sexual offending and about policy related to treatment and supervision. We present a positive sexuality model and consider how the effectiveness of dealing with sexual offending issues could be improved through using a positive sexuality approach to guide policy.

References

  1. Adam, B. D. (2003). The defense of marriage act and American exceptionalism: The “gay marriage” panic in the United States. Journal of the History of Sexuality, 12, 259–276.Google Scholar
  2. Advocates for Youth. (2007). The truth about abstinence-only programs. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 665–683.Google Scholar
  4. Alexander, M. A. (1999). Sexual offender treatment efficacy revisited. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Prevention and Treatment, 11, 101–117.Google Scholar
  5. American Correctional Association. (1994). ACA code of ethics. Alexandria, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  6. American Counseling Association. (2005). ACA code of ethics. Alexandria, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  7. American Medical Association. (1996). AMA code of medical ethics. Chicago, IL: Author.Google Scholar
  8. American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  9. Anglides, S. (2009). Inter/subjectivity, power and teacher-student sex crime. Intersubjectivity, 26, 87–108.Google Scholar
  10. Attwood, F. (2006). Sexed up: Theorizing the sexualization of culture. Sexualities, 9(1), 77–94.Google Scholar
  11. Bancroft, J. (2002). The medicalization of female sexual dysfunction: The need for caution. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 451–455.Google Scholar
  12. Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248–287.Google Scholar
  13. Beckmann, A. (2009). The social construction of sexuality and perversion: Deconstructing sadomasochism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Beech, A. R., & Hamilton-Giachritsis, C. E. (2005). Relationship between therapeutic climate and treatment outcome in group-based sexual offender treatment programs. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 127–140.Google Scholar
  15. Bell, L. C. (2014). A California law about reporting child porn puts psychotherapists in a bind. The Washington Post.Google Scholar
  16. Blagden, N., Winder, B., & Hames, C. (2014). “They treat us like human beings”—Experiencing a therapeutic sex offender prison: Impact on prisoners and staff and implications for treatment. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. doi:10.1177/0306624X14553227.
  17. Brannon, Y. N., Levenson, J. S., Fortney, T., & Baker, J. N. (2007). Attitudes about community notification: A comparison of sexual offenders and the non-offending public. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 369–379.Google Scholar
  18. Bullough, V. L. (1976). Sexual variance in society and history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Burchfield, K. B. (2012). Assessing community residents’ perceptions of local registered sex offenders: Results from a pilot survey. Deviant Behavior, 33, 241–259.Google Scholar
  20. Cacchioni, T., & Tiefer, L. (Eds.). (2012). Journal of Sex Research, 49(4). Special issue on the medicalization of sex.Google Scholar
  21. Carroll, J. S., Padilla-Walker, L. M., Nelson, L. J., Olson, C. D., Barry, C. M., & Madsen, S. D. (2008). Generation XXX pornography acceptance and use among emerging adults. Journal of Adolescent Research, 23, 6–30.Google Scholar
  22. Center for Sex Offender Management. (2001). Recidivism of sex offenders. Silver Spring, MD: Author.Google Scholar
  23. Center for Sex Offender Management. (no date). Assessment. Silver Spring, MD: Author. Retrieved January 20, 2015, from http://www.csom.org/pubs/cap/2/2_0.htm
  24. Chesney-Lind, M., & Morash, M. (2013). Transformative feminist criminology: A critical re-thinking of a discipline. Critical Criminology, 21, 287–304.Google Scholar
  25. Cochran, J. K., & Beeghley, L. (1991). The influence of religion on attitudes toward nonmarital sexuality: A preliminary assessment of reference group theory. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 30(1), 45–62.Google Scholar
  26. Cohen, M., & Jeglic, E. L. (2007). Sex offender legislation in the United States: What do we know? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51, 369–383.Google Scholar
  27. Conrad, B. K. (2006). Neo-institutionalism, social movements, and the cultural reproduction of a mentalité: Promise Keepers reconstruct the Madonna/whore complex. The Sociological Quarterly, 47(2), 305–331.Google Scholar
  28. De Block, A., & Adriaens, P. R. (2013). Pathologizing sexual deviance: A history. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 276–298.Google Scholar
  29. Deckman, M., & McTague, J. (2014). Did the “War on Women” work? Women, men, and the birth control mandate in the 2012 Presidential election. American Politics Research, 43(1), 3–26.Google Scholar
  30. DeKeseredy, W. S., & Olsson, P. (2010). Adult pornography, male peer support, and violence against women: The contribution of the “dark side” of the Internet. In M. V. Martin, M. A. Garcia-Ruiz, & A. Edwards (Eds.), Technology for facilitating humanity and combating social deviations: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 34–50). Hershey, PA: Information Science Research.Google Scholar
  31. Diamond, L. M. (2009). Sexual fluidity: Understanding women’s love and desire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Döring, N. M. (2009). The Internet’s impact on sexuality: A critical review of 15 years of research. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 1089–1101.Google Scholar
  33. Dworkin, A. (1981). Pornography: Men possessing women. New York: Perigee Books.Google Scholar
  34. Elliott, S., & Ngo-McKelvy, J. (2015). Talking sex: Parents, schools, and sexuality. In T. S. Weinberg & S. Newmahr (Eds.), Selves, symbols, and sexualities: An interactionist anthology (pp. 77–88). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Furby, L., Weinrott, M. R., & Blackshaw, L. (1989). Sex offender recidivism: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 3–30.Google Scholar
  36. Gergen, K. J. (2000). Psychological science in a postmodern context. American Psychologist, 56, 803–813.Google Scholar
  37. Gibeaut, J. (2007). A deal with death. American Bar Association Journal (January Issue), 12–13.Google Scholar
  38. Gill, R. (2012). Media, empowerment and the ‘sexualization of culture’ debates. Sex Roles, 66(11–12), 736–745.Google Scholar
  39. Glickman, C. (2000). The language of sex-positivity. Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality, 3. Retrieved from http://www.ejhs.org/volume3/sexpositive.htm
  40. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  41. Gooren, J. C. W. (2011). Deciphering the ambiguous menace of sexuality for the innocence of childhood. Critical Criminology, 19, 29–42.Google Scholar
  42. Grady, M. D., & Brodersen, M. (2008). In their voices: Perspectives of incarcerated sex offenders on their treatment experiences. Sexual Addiction and Compulsivity, 15, 320–345.Google Scholar
  43. Griffin, T., & Stitt, R. G. (2010). Random activities theory: The case for a “black swan” criminology. Critical Criminology, 18, 57–72.Google Scholar
  44. Hall, R. C. W., & Hall, R. C. W. (2007). A profile of pedophilia: Definition, characteristics of offenders, recidivism, treatment outcomes, and forensic issues. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 82, 457–471.Google Scholar
  45. Hanson, R. K., Bourgon, G., Helmus, L., & Hodgson, S. (2009). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 865–891.Google Scholar
  46. Hanson, R. K., & Bussiere, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348–362.Google Scholar
  47. Hanson, R. K., Morton, K. E., & Harris, A. J. R. (2003). Sexual offender recidivism risk: What we know and what we need to know. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 154–166.Google Scholar
  48. Harrison, T. (2005). Availability of emergency contraception: A survey of hospital emergency department staff. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 46(2), 105–110.Google Scholar
  49. Hayes, S., & Carpenter, B. (2012). Out of time: The moral temporality of sex, crime and taboo. Critical Criminology, 20, 141–152.Google Scholar
  50. Hildebrandt, A. (2014). Routes to decriminalization: A comparative analysis of the legalization of same-sex sexual acts. Sexualities, 17, 230–253.Google Scholar
  51. Hinderliter, A. C. (2011). Defining paraphilia in DSM-5: Do not disregard grammar. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 37(1), 17–31.Google Scholar
  52. Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  53. Huebner, D. M., Rebchook, G. M., & Kegeles, S. M. (2004). Experiences of harassment, discrimination, and physical violence among young gay and bisexual men. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 1200.Google Scholar
  54. Irvine, J. M. (2004). Talk about sex: The battles over sex education in the United States. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  55. Jahnke, S., Imhoff, R., & Hoyer, J. (2014). Stigmatization of people with pedophilia: Two comparative surveys. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(1), 21–34.Google Scholar
  56. Janus, E. S. (2003). Legislative responses to sexual violence: An overview. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 247–264.Google Scholar
  57. Kersting, K. (2003). New hope for sex offender treatment. Monitor on Psychology, 34(7), 52–53.Google Scholar
  58. Kirby, D. B. (2008). The impact of abstinence and comprehensive sex and STD/HIV education programs on adolescent sexual behavior. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 5(3), 18–27.Google Scholar
  59. Kleinplatz, P. J., Menard, A. D., & Lawless, S. (2014). Lessons about optimal sexual experiences from remarkable lovers. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and wellbeing research (pp. 3540–3543). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  60. Kleinplatz, P. J., & Moser, C. (2005). Is S/M pathological? Lesbian & Gay Psychology Review, 6, 255–260.Google Scholar
  61. Kohler, P., Manhart, L., & Lafferty, W. (2007). Abstinence-only and comprehensive sex education and the initiation of sexual activity and teen pregnancy. Journal of Adolescent Health, 42, 344–351.Google Scholar
  62. LaFrance, D. E., Loe, M., & Brown, S. C. (2012). “Yes means yes:” A new approach to sexual assault prevention and positive sexuality promotion. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 7, 445–460.Google Scholar
  63. Lamb, S., & Peterson, Z. D. (2012). Adolescent girls’ sexual empowerment: Two feminists explore the concept. Sex Roles, 66(11–12), 703–712.Google Scholar
  64. Laws, D. R. (2002). Sexual offending is a public health problem: Are we doing enough? In T. Ward, D. R. Laws, & S. M. Hudson (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Issues and controversies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  65. Levenson, J., & Cotter, L. (2005). The impact of residency restrictions: 1,000 feet from danger or one step from absurd? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 168–178.Google Scholar
  66. Levenson, J., & Hern, A. L. (2007). Sex offender residence restrictions: Unintended consequences and community re-entry. Justice Research and Policy, 9, 59–73.Google Scholar
  67. Levenson, J., & Tewksbury, R. (2009). Collateral damage: Family members of registered sex offenders. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 54–68.Google Scholar
  68. Levine, M. P., & Troiden, R. R. (1988). The myth of sexual compulsivity. Journal of Sex Research, 25(3), 347–363.Google Scholar
  69. Lindberg, L., & Maddow-Zimet, I. (2012). Consequences of sex education on teen and young adult sexual behaviors and outcomes. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51(4), 332–338.Google Scholar
  70. Lipset, S. M. (1997). American exceptionalism: A double-edged sword. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  71. Logan, W. A. (2003). Sex offender registration and community notification: Emerging legal and research issues. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 337–351.Google Scholar
  72. Losel, F., & Schmucker, M. (2005). The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 117–146.Google Scholar
  73. Lovins, B., Lowenkamp, C. T., & Latessa, E. J. (2009). Applying the risk principle to sex offenders: Can treatment make some sex offenders worse? The Prison Journal, 89, 344–357.Google Scholar
  74. Luker, K. (2007). When sex goes to school: Warring views on sex—and sex education—since the Sixties. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  75. MacKinnon, C. A. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Maguire, M., & Singer, J. K. (2010). A false sense of security: Moral panic driven sex offender legislation. Critical Criminology, 19, 301–312.Google Scholar
  77. Mailloux, D. L., Abrecen, J., Serin, R., Cousineau, C., Malcolm, B., & Looman, J. (2003). Dosage of treatment to sexual offenders: Are we overprescribing? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47, 171–184.Google Scholar
  78. Marshall, W. L. (2005). Therapist style in sexual offender treatment: Influence on indices of change. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 109–116.Google Scholar
  79. Marshall, W. L., Marshall, L. E., & Serran, G. A. (2007). Strategies in the treatment of paraphilias: A critical review (pp. 162–182). XVII: Annual Review of Sex Research.Google Scholar
  80. Marshall, W. L., Ward, T., Mann, R. E., Moulden, H., Fernandez, Y. M., Serrin, G., & Marshall, L. E. (2005). Working positively with sexual offenders: Maximizing the effectiveness of treatment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1096–1114.Google Scholar
  81. McNair, B. (2013). Porno? Chic!: How pornography changed the world and made it a better place. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  82. Meloy, M. L. (2005). The sex offender next door: An analysis of recidivism, risk factors and deterrence of sex offenders on probation. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 16, 211–236.Google Scholar
  83. Meloy, M., Boatwright, J., & Curtis, K. (2013). Views from the top and bottom: Lawmakers and practitioners discuss sex offender laws. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 616–638.Google Scholar
  84. Miner, M. (2006). Sexual offender treatment: A forensic vs. human sexuality perspective. Keynote address at the 23rd Annual Conference of the National Organization of Forensic Social Work, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  85. Monto, M. A., & McRee, N. (2005). A comparison of the male customers of female street prostitutes with national samples of men. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 505–529.Google Scholar
  86. Moser, C. (2009). When is an unusual sexual interest a mental disorder? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 323–325.Google Scholar
  87. National Association of Social Workers. (1999). Code of ethics. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  88. Neuilly, M. A., & Zgoba, K. (2006). Assessing the possibility of a pedophilia panic and contagion effect between France and the United States. Victims and Offenders, 1, 225–254.Google Scholar
  89. Ogle, R. S., & Batton, C. (2009). Revisiting patriarchy: Its conceptualization and operationalization in criminology. Critical Criminology, 17(3), 159–182.Google Scholar
  90. Oliver, B. (2012). A convict criminology perspective on sex offender laws: America’s “War against sex offenders”. Journal of Prisoners on Prisons, 21, 119–131.Google Scholar
  91. Ortmann, D. M., & Sprott, R. (2012). Sexual outsiders: Understanding BDSM sexualities and communities. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  92. Paine, M. L., & Hansen, D. J. (2002). Factors influencing children to self-disclose sexual abuse. Clinical Psychology Review, 22(2), 271–295.Google Scholar
  93. Pepinski, H. (2002). A struggle to inquire without becoming an un-critical non-criminologist. Critical Criminology, 11, 61–73.Google Scholar
  94. Pepinski, H. (2013). Peacemaking criminology. Critical Criminology, 21, 319–339.Google Scholar
  95. Pew Research Center (2014). Gay marriage around the world. Accessed 20 October 2014. http://www.pewforum.org/2013/12/19/gay-marriage-around-the-world-2013/
  96. Pfafflin, F., & Eher, R. (2003). Guest editorial: What to do with sexual offenders? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47, 361–365.Google Scholar
  97. Popovic, M. (2006). Psychosocial diversity as the best representation of human normality across cultures. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 21, 171–186.Google Scholar
  98. Potter, H. (2013). Intersectional criminology: Interrogating identity and power in criminological research and theory. Critical Criminology, 21, 305–318.Google Scholar
  99. Prescott, J. J., & Rockoff, J. E. (2011). Do sex offender registration and notification laws affect criminal behavior? Journal of Law and Economics, 54, 161–206.Google Scholar
  100. Prochaska, J. O., & Velicer, W. F. (1997). The Transtheoretical Model of health behavior change. American Journal of Health Promotion, 12, 38–48.Google Scholar
  101. Quinn, J. F., Forsyth, C. J., & Mullen-Quinn, C. (2004). Societal reaction to sex offenders: A review of the origins and results of the myths surrounding their crimes and treatment amenability. Deviant Behavior, 25, 215–232.Google Scholar
  102. Radford, J., & Stanko, E. (1991). Violence against women and children: The contradictions of crime control under patriarchy. In K. Stenson & D. Cowell (Eds.), The politics of crime control (pp. 188–202). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  103. Richardson, L. (2000). New writing practices in qualitative research. Sociology of Sport Journal, 17, 5–20.Google Scholar
  104. Robbers, M. L. P. (2009). Lifers on the outside: Sex offenders and disintegrative shaming. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 53, 5–28.Google Scholar
  105. Robinson, L. O. (2003). Sex offender management: The public policy challenges. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 1–7.Google Scholar
  106. Ronel, N., & Elisha, E. (2011). A different perspective: Introducing positive criminology. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55, 305–325.Google Scholar
  107. Ronel, N., & Segev, D. (2014). Positive criminology in practice. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58, 1389–1407.Google Scholar
  108. Rubin, G. (1984). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In C. Vance (Ed.), Exploring female sexuality (pp. 267–319). Boston, MA: Routledge.Google Scholar
  109. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and wellbeing. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.Google Scholar
  110. Saez, M. (2011). Same-sex marriage, same-sex cohabitation, and same-sex families around the world: Why same is so different. American Journal of Gender and Social Policy, 19, 1.Google Scholar
  111. Scott, J. (1998). Changing attitudes to sexual morality: A cross-national comparison. Sociology, 32(4), 815–845.Google Scholar
  112. Sherkat, D. E., & Ellison, C. G. (1997). The cognitive structure of a moral crusade: Conservative Protestantism and opposition to pornography. Social Forces, 75(3), 957–980.Google Scholar
  113. Skinner, T., & Taylor, H. (2009). “Being shut out in the dark:” Young survivors’ experiences of reporting a sexual offence. Feminist Criminology, 4, 130–150.Google Scholar
  114. Soothill, K. (2010). Sex offender recidivism. Crime and Justice, 39, 145–211.Google Scholar
  115. Sparkes, A. C. (2002). Telling tales in sport and physical activity: A qualitative journey. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  116. Sullivan, D. (2006). Editor’s note. Contemporary Justice Review, 9, 119–125.Google Scholar
  117. Surette, R. (2007). Media, crime, and criminal justice: Images, realities, and policies. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  118. Tavris, C., & Wade, C. (1984). The longest war (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  119. Tewksbury, R. (2012). Stigmatization of sex offenders. Deviant Behavior, 33, 606–623.Google Scholar
  120. Thomas, J. N. (2013). Outsourcing moral authority: The internal secularization of evangelicals’ anti-pornography narratives. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52(3), 457–475.Google Scholar
  121. Thomas, J. N., & Olson, D. V. A. (2012). Evangelical elites’ changing responses to homosexuality 1960–2009. Sociology of Religion, 73(3), 239–272.Google Scholar
  122. Tiefer, L. (1996). The medicalization of sexuality: Conceptual, normative, and professional issues. Annual Review of Sex Research, 7(1), 252–282.Google Scholar
  123. US House of Representatives, Committee on Government Reform. (2004). The content of federally funded abstinence-only education programs, prepared for Rep. Henry A. Waxman. Washington, DC: The House.Google Scholar
  124. Viki, G. T., Fullerton, I., Raggett, H., Tait, F., & Wiltshire, S. (2012). The role of dehumanization in attitudes toward the social exclusion and rehabilitation of sex offenders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 2349–2367.Google Scholar
  125. Walton, J. S., & Chou, S. (2014). The effectiveness of psychological treatment for reducing recidivism in child molesters: A systematic review of randomized and nonrandomized studies. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse. doi:10.1177/1524838014537905.
  126. Ward, T., & Brown, M. (2004). The good lives model and conceptual issues in offender rehabilitation. Psychology, Crime and Law, 10, 243–257.Google Scholar
  127. Ward, T., Day, A., & Casey, S. (2006). Offender rehabilitation down under. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 43(3), 73–83.Google Scholar
  128. Ward, T., & Marshall, W. L. (2004). Good lives, aetiology and the rehabilitation of sex offenders: A bridging theory. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 10, 153–169.Google Scholar
  129. Watters, D. N. (2006). Forensic sexology versus clinical sexology: Some cautionary comments. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 21, 143–148.Google Scholar
  130. Weitzer, R. (2006). Moral crusade against prostitution. Society, 43(3), 33–38.Google Scholar
  131. Weitzer, R. (2007). The social construction of sex trafficking: Ideology and institutionalization of a moral crusade. Politics and Society, 35(3), 447–475.Google Scholar
  132. Weitzer, R. (2010). The mythology of prostitution: Advocacy research and public policy. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 7(1), 15–29.Google Scholar
  133. West, F. (2000). Paedophilia: Plague or panic? The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 11, 511–531.Google Scholar
  134. Widmer, E. D., Treas, J., & Newcomb, R. (1998). Attitudes toward nonmarital sex in 24 countries. Journal of Sex Research, 35(4), 349–358.Google Scholar
  135. Williams, D. J. (2009). Turning monsters into people: A reflexive study of sex offenders and leisure. Journal of Unconventional Parks, Tourism, and Recreation Research, 2(1), 2–6.Google Scholar
  136. Williams, D. J., & Burnett, J. (2012). Interrelated problems of silencing voices and sexual crime: Convict criminology insights for reducing victimization. Journal of Prisoners on Prisons, 21, 132–138.Google Scholar
  137. Williams, D. J., Prior, E. E., & Wegner, J. (2013). Resolving social problems associated with sexuality: Can a “sex positive” approach help? Social Work, 58, 273–276.Google Scholar
  138. Williams, D. J., Thomas, J. N., Prior, E. E., & Walters, W. (2015). Introducing a multidisciplinary framework of positive sexuality. Journal of Positive Sexuality, 1, 6–11.Google Scholar
  139. Winkelman, S. B., Smith, K. V., Brinkley, J., & Knox, D. (2014). Sexting on the college campus. Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality, 17. Retrieved from http://www.ejhs.org/volume17/Sexting.html
  140. World Health Organization. (2006). Defining sexual health: Report of a technical consultation on sexual health. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. J. Williams
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jeremy N. Thomas
    • 1
    • 2
  • Emily E. Prior
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of SociologyIdaho State UniversityPocatelloUSA
  2. 2.Center for Positive SexualityLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.College of the CanyonsSanta ClaritaUSA

Personalised recommendations