Skip to main content
Log in

Bourdieu and Foucault: A Conceptual Integration Toward an Empirical Sociology of Prisons

  • Published:
Critical Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the similarities between them are under analyzed, Pierre Bourdieu’s and Michel Foucault’s theories of culture and power are interrelated in some compelling ways. Outline of a Theory of Practice (1977) and Discipline and Punish (1979) are two of the most influential contributions in post-structural and postmodern theory. Yet, far more attention is paid to Foucault’s contributions in criminology than to Bourdieu’s. This essay brings together the work of these influential theorists to argue for a critical examination of the sociology of prisons. Bourdieu’s concepts of: (1) habitus, (2) ethos, (3) doxa, and (4) the theory of practice are related to Foucault’s ideas about (1) discipline, (2) docile bodies, (3) panopticism, and (4) history of the present by comparing specific examples from the original works. Then, the combination of those primary concepts is used to address specific methodological concerns researchers should consider when doing empirical research in prison.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, M., & Longhurst, B. (1994). Discourse, power and justice: Towards a new sociology of imprisonment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrigo, B. (1995). The peripheral core of law and criminology: On postmodern social theory and conceptual integration. Justice Quarterly, 12(3), 447–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, G. (1997). Integrating criminologies. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, T. J., & Snipes, J. B. (1996). Theoretical integration in criminology. Crime and Justice, 20, 301–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, M., & Sparks, R. (2000). New directions in prison studies: Some introductory comments. Theoretical Criminology, 4(3), 259–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calavita, K., & Seron, C. (1992). Postmodernism and protest: Recovering the sociological imagination. Law and Society Review, 26(4), 765–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C., LiPuma, E., & Postone, M. (1993). Bourdieu: Critical perspectives. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callewaert, S. (2006). Bourdieu, critic of Foucault: The case of empirical social science against double-game-philosophy. Theory, Culture & Society, 23, 73–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrabine, E. (2000). Discourse, governmentality and translation: Towards a social theory of imprisonment. Theoretical Criminology, 4, 309–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, C. (1996). Bourdieu and Foucault on power and modernity. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 22(6), 55–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewick, P., & Silbey, S. (1995). Subversive stories and hegemonic tales: Toward a sociology of narrative. Law and Society Review, 29(2), 197–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, J. (1999). Cultural criminology. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 395–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, J., & Sanders, C. R. (1995). Cultural criminology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, K. (1999). Reproducing criminal types: Cognitive treatment for violent offenders in prison. The Sociological Quarterly, 40(3), 435–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garland, D. (1996). The limits of the sovereign state: Strategies of crime control in contemporary society. The British Journal of Criminology, 36(4), 445–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handler, J. F. (1992). Postmodernism, protest and the new social movements. Law and Society Review, 26(4), 697–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogeveen, B., & Woolford, A. (2006). Critical criminology and possibility in the neo-liberal ethos. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 8(5), 681–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, D. C. (1999). Critical resistance: Foucault and Bourdieu. In G. Weiss & H. F. Haber (Eds.), Perspectives on embodiment: The intersections of nature and culture (pp. 4–20). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, S. C. (2004). The unconventional methods of cultural criminology. Theoretical Criminology, 8(3), 303–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leavitt, G. (1999). Criminological theory as an art form: Implications for criminal justice policy. Crime and Delinquency, 45, 389–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathiesen, T. (1966). The sociology of prisons: Problems for future research. The British Journal of Sociology, 17(4), 360–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milovanovic, D. (1997). Postmodern criminology. New York: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myles, J. F. (2004). From doxa to experience: Issues in Bourdieu’s adoption of Husserlian phenomenology. Theory, Culture & Society, 21(2), 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podgòrecki, A. (1994). Social oppression. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presdee, M. (2000). Cultural criminology and the carnival of crime. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, L. (2001). Toward an anthropology of prisons. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, L. (2004). Total confinement: Madness and reason in the maximum security prison. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S. (1997). The failure of postmodern criminology. Critical Criminology, 8(2), 61–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, J. A. (2008). Issues in interviewing inmates: Navigating the methodological landmines of prison research. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(8), 1500–1525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M. B., & Lyman, S. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33(1), 46–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seron, C., & Munger, F. (1996). Law and inequality: Race, gender …and, of course, class. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 187–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skoll, G. J. (1992). Walk the walk and talk the talk: An ethnography of a drug abuse treatment facility. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloop, J. M. (1996). The cultural prison: Discourse, prisoners, and punishment. Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swartz, D. (1997). Culture and power: The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (1989). Towards a reflexive sociology: A workshop with Pierre Bourdieu. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 26–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2000). The new ‘peculiar institution’: On the prison as surrogate ghetto. Theoretical Criminology, 4, 377–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeldon, J., & Heidt, J. (2007). Bridging the gap: A pragmatic approach to understanding critical criminologies and policy influence. Critical Criminology, 15, 313–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer A. Schlosser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schlosser, J.A. Bourdieu and Foucault: A Conceptual Integration Toward an Empirical Sociology of Prisons. Crit Crim 21, 31–46 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-012-9164-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-012-9164-1

Keywords

Navigation