Presidential Candidates and State Crime: Views of Some U.S. College Students
- 87 Downloads
This is a preliminary investigation of hawkish public opinion, understood as criminogenic in that it provides political support for state crimes of aggressive militarism. Our critical criminology approach treats public support for, or acceptance of, state aggression as part of criminogenic political culture. Despite growing interest among critical criminologists in broader perspectives on state crime and the politics of culture, there has been no work on this topic. Our survey of 53 criminal justice students at a liberal arts college finds both hawkish (militarist) and dovish (peaceful) beliefs and preferences regarding U.S. policy and the two major 2008 presidential candidates, Obama and McCain. We investigate whether authoritarianism helps explain hawkish opinions, but find little evidence for that expectation. We find evidence of respondent underestimation of the hawkishness of U.S. politics. We also find extensive evidence of dovish policy preferences, such as approval of diplomacy, a major attraction to Obama.
KeywordsPublic Opinion Foreign Policy National Security State Crime Military Action
Thank you to Aida Kalapo and Diaghilev Lubin, Sacred Heart University Criminal Justice Department graduate students, for their assistance.
- Altemeyer, B. (2006). The authoritarians. Winnipeg, Canada: Cherry Hill Publishing.Google Scholar
- Alvarez, A. (2008). Destructive beliefs: genocide and the role of ideology. In A. Smeulers & R. Haveman (Eds.), Supranational criminology: towards a criminology of international crimes (pp. 213–231). Antwerp; Portland: Intersentia.Google Scholar
- Boggs, C. (2003a). Masters of war: militarism and blowback in the era of American empire (1st ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Boggs, C. (2003b). Outlaw nation: the legacy of U.S. war crimes. In C. Boggs (Ed.), Masters of war: Militarism, blowback in the era of American empire (pp. 191–226). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- CNNPolitics.com. 2008. “Transcript of Second McCain, Obama Debate.” Available at: http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/07/presidential.debate.transcript/#cnnSTCText [Accessed February 27, 2009].
- de Lint, W. (2004). Neoconservativism and American counter-terrorism: endarkened policy? In M. Deflem (Ed.), Terrorism and counter-terrorism: Criminological perspectives. New York: Elsevier/JAI Press.Google Scholar
- Domhoff, G. W. (2002). The power elite, public policy, and public opinion. In J. Manza, F. L. Cook & B. I. Page (Eds.), Navigating public opinion: Polls, policy, and the future of American democracy (pp. 124–137). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Enloe, C. (2007). Globalization and militarism: Feminists make the link. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
- Ferrell, J., Hayward, K., & Young, J. (2008). Cultural criminology: An invitation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
- Gallup, Inc. 2009. “Military and National Defense.” Available at: http://www.gallup.com/poll/1666/military-national-defense.aspx [Accessed December 18, 2009].
- Galtung, J. (2002). Americanization versus globalization. In B.-R. Eliezer & S. Yitzhak (Eds.), Identity, culture, globalization (p. 716). London: Brill.Google Scholar
- Joseph, P. (2007). Are Americans becoming more peaceful?. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
- Kauzlarich, D. (2007). Seeing war as criminal: Peace activist views and critical criminology. Contemporary Justice Review: Issues in Criminal, Social and Restorative Justice, 10(1), 67.Google Scholar
- Kellner, D. (2003). From 9/11 to terror war: The dangers of the bush legacy. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
- Kramer, R. C., Michalowski, R. J., & Rothe, D. (2005). The supreme international crime: How the U.S. war in Iraq threatens the rule of law. Social Justice, 32(2), 52–81.Google Scholar
- Lieven, A. (2004). America right or wrong: An anatomy of American nationalism. USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Pearce, F., & Tombs, S. (2002). States, corporations and the “new” world order. In G. W. Potter (Ed.), Controversies in white-collar crime (pp. 185–222). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.Google Scholar
- Rothe, D. L., & Friedrichs, D. O. (2006). The state of the criminology of crimes of the state. Social Justice, 33, 147–162.Google Scholar
- Shalom, S. (1993). Imperial alibis: Rationalizing U.S. intervention after the cold war. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
- Staub, E., & Bar-Tal, D. (2003). Genocide, mass killing, and intractable conflict: Roots, evolution, prevention, and reconciliation. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy & R. Jervis (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 710–751). USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Welch, M. (2007). Moral panic, denial and human rights: Scanning the spectrum from overreaction to underreaction. In D. Downes, P. Rock, C. Chinkin & C. Gearty (Eds.), Crime, social control and human rights: From moral panics to states of denial: Essays in honour of Stanley Cohen, (pp. 92–104). Portland, OR: Willan Publishing (UK).Google Scholar
- Whyte, D. (2007). Market patriotism and the “war on terror”. Social Justice, 34(3–4), 111–131.Google Scholar