Advertisement

Critical Criminology

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 191–209 | Cite as

Presidential Candidates and State Crime: Views of Some U.S. College Students

  • Josh KleinEmail author
  • Cathryn Lavery
Article

Abstract

This is a preliminary investigation of hawkish public opinion, understood as criminogenic in that it provides political support for state crimes of aggressive militarism. Our critical criminology approach treats public support for, or acceptance of, state aggression as part of criminogenic political culture. Despite growing interest among critical criminologists in broader perspectives on state crime and the politics of culture, there has been no work on this topic. Our survey of 53 criminal justice students at a liberal arts college finds both hawkish (militarist) and dovish (peaceful) beliefs and preferences regarding U.S. policy and the two major 2008 presidential candidates, Obama and McCain. We investigate whether authoritarianism helps explain hawkish opinions, but find little evidence for that expectation. We find evidence of respondent underestimation of the hawkishness of U.S. politics. We also find extensive evidence of dovish policy preferences, such as approval of diplomacy, a major attraction to Obama.

Keywords

Public Opinion Foreign Policy National Security State Crime Military Action 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Thank you to Aida Kalapo and Diaghilev Lubin, Sacred Heart University Criminal Justice Department graduate students, for their assistance.

References

  1. Altemeyer, B. (2006). The authoritarians. Winnipeg, Canada: Cherry Hill Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Alvarez, A. (2008). Destructive beliefs: genocide and the role of ideology. In A. Smeulers & R. Haveman (Eds.), Supranational criminology: towards a criminology of international crimes (pp. 213–231). Antwerp; Portland: Intersentia.Google Scholar
  3. Boggs, C. (2003a). Masters of war: militarism and blowback in the era of American empire (1st ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Boggs, C. (2003b). Outlaw nation: the legacy of U.S. war crimes. In C. Boggs (Ed.), Masters of war: Militarism, blowback in the era of American empire (pp. 191–226). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. CNNPolitics.com. 2008. “Transcript of Second McCain, Obama Debate.” Available at: http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/07/presidential.debate.transcript/#cnnSTCText [Accessed February 27, 2009].
  6. de Lint, W. (2004). Neoconservativism and American counter-terrorism: endarkened policy? In M. Deflem (Ed.), Terrorism and counter-terrorism: Criminological perspectives. New York: Elsevier/JAI Press.Google Scholar
  7. Domhoff, G. W. (2002). The power elite, public policy, and public opinion. In J. Manza, F. L. Cook & B. I. Page (Eds.), Navigating public opinion: Polls, policy, and the future of American democracy (pp. 124–137). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Enloe, C. (2007). Globalization and militarism: Feminists make the link. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Ferrell, J., Hayward, K., & Young, J. (2008). Cultural criminology: An invitation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  10. Gallup, Inc. 2009. “Military and National Defense.” Available at: http://www.gallup.com/poll/1666/military-national-defense.aspx [Accessed December 18, 2009].
  11. Galtung, J. (2002). Americanization versus globalization. In B.-R. Eliezer & S. Yitzhak (Eds.), Identity, culture, globalization (p. 716). London: Brill.Google Scholar
  12. Joseph, P. (2007). Are Americans becoming more peaceful?. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Kauzlarich, D. (2007). Seeing war as criminal: Peace activist views and critical criminology. Contemporary Justice Review: Issues in Criminal, Social and Restorative Justice, 10(1), 67.Google Scholar
  14. Kellner, D. (2003). From 9/11 to terror war: The dangers of the bush legacy. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  15. Kramer, R. C., & Michalowski, R. J. (2005). War, aggression and state crime: A criminological analysis of the invasion and occupation of Iraq. British Journal of Criminology, 45, 446–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kramer, R. C., Michalowski, R. J., & Rothe, D. (2005). The supreme international crime: How the U.S. war in Iraq threatens the rule of law. Social Justice, 32(2), 52–81.Google Scholar
  17. Lieven, A. (2004). America right or wrong: An anatomy of American nationalism. USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. McCulloch, J. (2004). Blue armies, khaki police and the cavalry on the new American frontier: Critical criminology for the 21st century. Critical Criminology, 12(3), 309–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pearce, F., & Tombs, S. (2002). States, corporations and the “new” world order. In G. W. Potter (Ed.), Controversies in white-collar crime (pp. 185–222). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.Google Scholar
  20. Rothe, D. L., & Friedrichs, D. O. (2006). The state of the criminology of crimes of the state. Social Justice, 33, 147–162.Google Scholar
  21. Rothe, D., et al. (2009). That was then, this is now, what about tomorrow? Future directions in state crime studies. Critical Criminology, 17(1), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shalom, S. (1993). Imperial alibis: Rationalizing U.S. intervention after the cold war. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
  23. Staub, E., & Bar-Tal, D. (2003). Genocide, mass killing, and intractable conflict: Roots, evolution, prevention, and reconciliation. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy & R. Jervis (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 710–751). USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Stenner, K. (2005). The authoritarian dynamic. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Webber, C. (2007). Background, foreground, foresight: The third dimension of cultural criminology? Crime Media Culture, 3(2), 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Welch, M. (2007). Moral panic, denial and human rights: Scanning the spectrum from overreaction to underreaction. In D. Downes, P. Rock, C. Chinkin & C. Gearty (Eds.), Crime, social control and human rights: From moral panics to states of denial: Essays in honour of Stanley Cohen, (pp. 92–104). Portland, OR: Willan Publishing (UK).Google Scholar
  28. Whyte, D. (2007). Market patriotism and the “war on terror”. Social Justice, 34(3–4), 111–131.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Criminal Justice, HC Suite 219Sacred Heart UniversityFairfieldUSA
  2. 2.Department of Criminal JusticeIona CollegeNew RochelleUSA

Personalised recommendations