Abstract
The Bridges work preparation program is a deliberate government-sponsored strategy to help and empower battered women to take responsibility for their own lives. However, while the Bridges program promotes the freedom to make choices, in reality there is little choice when powerful governments coerce battered women to align their personal choices with government goals. The Bridges work preparation program presents ultimatums to powerless women in the same way that male batterers present ultimatums to their female victims. Ultimatums to battered women in order to stay in the Bridges program are that they take individual responsibility to be free of their abusers, to be alcohol and drug free, to have their children in day care, and to be motivated to get employment. The Bridges program arguably puts too much responsibility on individual battered women to extricate themselves from the everyday lives of assault and violence and distances government from its social responsibility for helping battered women. In order to help battered women, governments must engage in social programs assisting them to relocate from one welfare office to another and assist with day care, transportation, and cash. This assistance will make disengaging from batterers a real alternative. Otherwise, alternatives for battered women are dependence on batterers or dependence on the state for social assistance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abel, R. (1980). Redirecting social studies of law. Law and Society Review, 14, 805–829.
Amir, M. (1971). Patterns in forcible rape. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Babbie, E. (2001). The practice of social research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame, and reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Braithwaite, J. (2000). The new regulatory state and the transformation of criminology. British Journal of Criminology, 40, 222–238.
Braithwaite, J. (2003). Restorative justice and a better future. In E. McLaughlin, R. Fergusson, G. Hughes, & L. Westmarland (Eds.), Restorative justice: Critical issues (pp. 54–65). London: Sage Publications.
Braithwaite, J., & Daly, K. (1994). Masculinities, violence, and communitarian control. In T. Newburn & E. Stanko (Eds.), Men, masculinities, and crime just boys doing business (pp. 189–213). New York: Routledge.
Brown, J. (1999). Chronology of events defining and addressing woman abuse. Paper presented at American Society of Criminology Annual Meetings in Toronto.
Browne, A., Salomon, A., & Bassuk S. S. (1999) The impact of recent partner violence on poor women’s capacity to maintain work. Violence Against Women, 5, 393–426.
Brush, L. D. 2000. “That’s why I’m on Prozac”: Battered women, traumatic stress, and education in the context of welfare reform. In V. Adair & S. Dahlberg (Eds.), And still we rise: Women, poverty, and the promise of education in America. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities: Knowledge, power, and social change. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Crawford, A. (1997). The local governance of crime: Appeals to community and partnerships. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
DeKeseredy, W., & MacLeod L. (1997). Woman abuse: A sociological story. Harcourt Brace: Toronto.
Dobash, R. (1991). The battered women’s movement and justice. Paper presented at Arizona State University.
Edwards, S. (1985). Male violence against women: Excusatory and explanatory ideologies in law, society. In S. Edwards (Ed.), Gender, sex, and the law (pp. 183–216). London: Croom Helm.
Fagan, J. (1988). Contributions of family violence research to criminal justice policy on wife Assault: Paradigms of science and social control. Violence and Victims 3, 159–186.
Ferraro, K. (1989). Policing woman battering. Social Problems, 36, 1–74.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. New York: Vintage.
Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. In L. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Foucault. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the Self. In Luther H. Martin, H. Gutman, & Patrick H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchall, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Fox, K. (1999). Changing violent minds: Discursive correction and resistance in the cognitive treatment of violent offenders in prison. Social Problems, 46, 83–103.
Gamache, D., & Snapp, S. (1995). Teach your children well: Elementary schools and violence prevention. In E. Peled, P. Jaffe, & J. Edleson (Eds.), Ending the cycle of violence: Community responses to children of battered women (pp. 209–231). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Garland, D. (1996). The Limits of the sovereign state: Strategies of crime control in contemporary society. British Journal of Criminology, 36, 445–471.
Garland, D. (1997). ‘Governmentality’ and the problem of crime: Foucault, criminology, sociology. Theoretical Criminology, 1, 173–214.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.
Hague, G., & Audrey M. 2006. Who listens? Survivors in service provision in the Kingdom. Violence Against Women, 12, 568–587.
Handler, J. F., & Hasenfeld, Y. (1997). We the poor people: work, poverty & welfare. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Klein, E., Campbell, J., Stoler, E., & Ghez, N. (1997). Ending domestic violence: Changing public perceptions and halting the epidemic. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Loseke, D. (1992). The battered woman and shelters: The social construction of wife abuse. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Marcus, I. (1994). Reframing domestic violence: Terrorism in the home. In M. Fineman, & R. Mykitiuk (Eds.), The public nature of private violence (pp. 11–35). New York: Routledge.
Miedzian, M. (1995). Learning to be violent. In E. Peled, P. Jaffe, & J. Edleson (Eds.), Ending the cycle of violence: Community responses to children of battered women (pp. 2–23). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Mello, L. (1998). The heart of intimate abuse: New interventions in child welfare, criminal justice, and health settings. New York: Springer Publishing Company Incorporated.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepeneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York: Penguin.
Pence, E., & Shepard, M. (1988). Integrating feminist theory and practice: The challenge of the battered women’s movement. In K. Yllo & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 282–298). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Pleck, E. (1987). Domestic tyranny. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ptacek, J. (1988). Why do men batter their wives? In K. Yllo & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 133–157). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Raphael, J. (1999). The family violence option: An early assessment. Violence Against Women, 5, 449–466.
Rose, N. (1996). Governing advanced liberal democracies. In A. Barry, T. Osborne, & N. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism, and rationalities of government (pp. 37–64). London: University College London Press.
Rose, N. (2000). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schwendinger, J., & Schwendinger, H. (1982). Rape, the law and private property. Crime and Delinquency, 28, 271–291.
Scott, E. K., London A. S., & Myers N. A. 2002. Dangerous dependencies: The intersection of welfare reform and domestic violence. Gender and Society, 16, 878–897.
Scully, D., & Marolla, J. (1984). Convicted rapists’ vocabulary of motive: Excuses and justifications. Social Problems, 31, 530–544.
Smith, D. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Spark, R. (1998). Men’s movements wolves in sheep’s clothing. Kingston: Queen’s University.
Stanko, E. (1999). Making compliant women. Paper presented to the American Society of Criminology, Toronto.
Suderman, M., Jaffe, P., & Hastings, E. (1995) Violence prevention programs in Secondary (High) Schools. In E. Peled, P. Jaffe, & J. Edleson (Eds.), Ending the cycle of violence: Community responses to children of battered women (pp. 223–254). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Thomas, J. (1993). Doing critical ethnography. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Tierney, K. (1982). The battered women movement and the creation of the wife-beating problem. Social Problems, 29, 207–220.
Von Hentig, H. (1948). The criminal and his victim. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Wells, A. (1994). Building bridges: A guide for setting up an employability project for women abuse survivors in your community. Victoria: Bridges for Women Society.
Wilson, W. J. (1996). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York: Vintage Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Silverstein, M., Spark, R. Social Bridges Falling Down: Reconstructing a ‘Troublesome Population’ of Battered Women through Individual Responsibilization Strategies. Crit Crim 15, 327–342 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-007-9039-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-007-9039-z