Critical Criminology

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 265–292 | Cite as

Racialisation in police stop and search practice – the Norwegian case

Article

Abstract

This paper explores the reasons for the conflictual relationship between the police and ethnic minority men in stop and search encounters, which leads to the often heard allegation that “All police are racists.” It deals with stop and search practices in Oslo as described in interviews with ethnic minority informants and police officers, and as observed through fieldwork amongst the Oslo police rank and file. The approach is qualitative, and explores the perceptions of those stopped by the police, as well as the police’s perception of stops and ethnic minority groups. The paper explores a few individual cases in depth to provide an alternative reading of stop and search that is lacking in the mainstay of quantitative studies. The first case analysed has a perspective which emphasises the interaction as it unfolds between the police and the ethnic minority man stopped, and explores the reasons for the resulting escalation. Elements of the stop which are analysed include the police’s refusal to explain the stop; this in turn causes disrespect on both sides which results in invectives, resistance, bystander involvement, and the police officers’ call for assistance. The other cases analysed in the paper are, to a higher degree, viewed in the light of police perceptions of and their contextual experiences regarding ethnic minorities. The complexity in the analysis corresponds to the complexity determining stop situations. Regular stop situations and their outcomes involve vague descriptions and the police’s lack of discernment in consideration of suspects from different ethnic minority groups. Police stereotyping accounts for what ethnic minority men perceive as unjustified stop and search, with the findings suggesting that the Oslo police practice ‘car profiling’ as much as ethnic profiling. To this end it is suggested in the paper that the combination of having dark skin and driving a BMW exposes ethnic minority men to stop and search.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anthony T., Copper C., Mullen B. (1992). Cross-racial facial identification: a social cognitive integration Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin No 3: 296–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansel-Henry, A. and Branner Jespersen, S. (2003). Konflikt på gadeplan – når etniske minoritetsungdom og politiet mødes. [Conflicts on street level – when ethnic minority youth and the police meet] Center for ungdomsforskning, Roskilde UniversityGoogle Scholar
  3. Barth, F. (ed.) (1998). Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: the Social Organization of Culture Difference. Prospect Heights Ill: Waveland PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Bayley D.H. (1990). Patterns of Policing. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  5. Bayley D.H. (2005).What the police do? In: Newburn T. (eds) Policing. Key Readings. Willan Publishing, Devon-Portland, pp. 141–150Google Scholar
  6. Bittner E. (1967). The police on ski-row: a study of peace keeping American Sociological Review 32(5): 699–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowling, B. (1998). Violent Racism: Victimization, Policing and Social Context. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
  8. Bourdieu P., Østerberg D. (1995). Distinksjonen: en sosiologisk kritikk av dØmmekraften. [La Distinction. Critique sociale du jugement]. Pax forlag, OsloGoogle Scholar
  9. Carmichael J.T. and Jacobs D. (2002). Violence by and Against the Police. In: R.G. Burns, and C.E. Crawford (eds.), Policing and Violence. New Jersey: Pearson Education inc., pp. 25–52Google Scholar
  10. Chan, J. (1996). “Changing police culture”. British Journal of Criminology. Vol. 36. No␣1, 1996, pp 109–134/Newburn, T. (ed.) (2005), Policing. Key Readings. Devon: Willan PublishingGoogle Scholar
  11. Christie N. (1982). Hvor tett et samfunn. [How densely knitted a society?]. Universitetsforlaget, OsloGoogle Scholar
  12. Choong S. (1997). Policing as Social Discipline. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen S. (2001). States of denial. Knowing about atrocities and suffering. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. European Commision against Racism and Intolerance 1999, second report on NorwayGoogle Scholar
  15. European Commision against Racism and Intolerance 2004, third report on NorwayGoogle Scholar
  16. Finstad L. (2003). Politiblikket. [The police glance]. Pax forlag, OsloGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferguson D.P., Rhodes G., Lee K., Sriram N. (2001). They all look alike to me: Prejudice and cross-race face recognition British Journal of Psychology 92: 567–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goldstein H. (1990). Problem-oriented policing. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Gullestad M. (2005). Normalising Racial boundaries. The Norwegian dispute about the term neger Social Anthropology 13(1): 27–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Granér, R. (2004). Patrulleranda polisers yrkeskultur. [Patrolling police officers’ occupational culture] Lund dissertations in social work 18Google Scholar
  21. Gullestad M. (2002). Det norske sett med nye øyne [The Norwegian as perceived by new eyes] Universitetsforlaget, OsloGoogle Scholar
  22. Gundersen, F., Haslund, U., Hustad, A.E., and Stene, R.J. (2000). Innvandrere og nordmenn som offer og gjerningsmenn. [Immigrants and Norwegians as victims and offenders] Oslo- Kongsvinger: Statistics Norway 2000/18Google Scholar
  23. Holdaway S. (1997). Constructing and sustaining ‘race’ within the police workforce The British Journal of Sociology 48(1): 19–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Holdaway, S. (1996). The Racialisation of British Policing. Black or white? Macmillan Press ltdGoogle Scholar
  25. Hallsworth, S. and McGuire, M. (2004). Examining stop an search patterns in the City of London. London Metropolitan UniversityGoogle Scholar
  26. Holmberg L., Kyvsgaard B. (2003). Are immigrants and their descendants discriminated against in the Danish criminal justice system Scandinavian Journal of Criminology and Crime Prevention 4(2): 125–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Holmberg L. (2000). Discretionary leniency and typological guilt: results from a Danish study of police discretion. Scandinavian Journal of Criminology and Crime Prevention 2: 179–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Holmberg L. (1999). Inden for lovens rammer. Politiets arbejdsmetoder og konkrete skøn. [Within the frames of the law. The police’ work methods and discretion]. Gyldendal, KøbenhavnGoogle Scholar
  29. Katz, J. (1988). Seductions of Crime. Moral and Sensual Attractions in Doing Evil. Basic Books, inc. Publishers 1988Google Scholar
  30. Kleining, J. (1996). Handled with Discretion. Ethical Issues in Police Decision Making. Rowman and Littelfield publishers incGoogle Scholar
  31. Klockars, C.B. (1996). A theory of excessive force and its control. In W.A. Geller and H. Toch (eds.), Police Violence. Understanding and Controlling Police Abuse of Force, pp. 1–22Google Scholar
  32. McNamara, R. (2002). From report takers to report makers. Understanding the police and violence. In R.G. Burns and C.E. Crawford (eds.), Policing and Violence, pp.␣52–73Google Scholar
  33. Manning, P.K. (1978). Rules, colleagues, and situationally justified actions. In P.␣Manning and J. van Maanen (eds.), Policing: a View from the Street, pp. 71–90Google Scholar
  34. The Norwegian Police Directorate (2003). Registrering og dokumentasjon i forbindelse med politikontroller. [Registration and documentation connected to police controls]Google Scholar
  35. The Norwegian Government’s plan of action against racism and discrimination, 2002–2006Google Scholar
  36. Reiner R. (2000). The Politics of the Police. Oxford University Press, Oxford New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Reiner R. 1989). Race and criminal justice New Community 16(1):5–21Google Scholar
  38. Skolnick J. (1994). Justice Without Trial. Law Enforcement in a Democratic Society. Macmillan College Publishing Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Shearing D.D., Ericson R.V. (1991). Culture as figurative action British Journal of Sociology 42:481–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smith, St., M. (2004). Do they all look alike? An exploration of decision-making strategies in cross-facial identifications. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, (http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3717/is_200404/ai_n9395002/print)Google Scholar
  41. Solomos J. (2003). Race and Racism in Britain. Palgrave: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  42. Sollund R. (2005). Obstacles and possibilities in police research Outlines Critical Social Studies 2: 43–64Google Scholar
  43. Statistics Norway (2005a). http://www.ssb.no/innvbef/main.htmlGoogle Scholar
  44. Statistics Norway (2005b). http://www.ssb.no/emner/02/01/10/innvbef/tab-2005-05-26-14.htmlGoogle Scholar
  45. Waddington, P.A.J. (1999a). ‘Discretion’, ‘respectability’ and institutional police racism. Sociological Research Online 4 (1)Google Scholar
  46. Waddington P.A.J. (1999b). Police (canteen) subc-culture. An appreciation British Journal of Criminology 39(2): 287–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Waddington P.A.J. (2003). Policing Citizens Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  48. Waddington P.A.J., Stenson K., Don D. (2004). In proportion. Race and police stop and search. British Journal of Criminology 44(6): 889–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Young M. (1991). An Inside Job Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  50. Walker P.M., Tanaka J.W. (2003). An encoding advantage for own-race versus other-race faces. Perception 32: 1117–1125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wasserman, D. (1996). Racial Generalizations and Police Discretion. In J. Kleinig, (ed.), Handled with Discretion, pp. 115–131Google Scholar
  52. Worden R.E. (1996). The causes of police brutality. Theory and evidence on Police Use of Force. In: W.A. Geller and H. Toch (eds) Police Violence. Understanding and Controlling Police Abuse and Force. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, pp. 23–51Google Scholar
  53. Young J. (1994). Policing the Streets: Stops and Search in North London. Centre for Criminology, Middlesex University, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Norwegian Social Research (Nova)Elisenberg OsloNorway

Personalised recommendations