Critical Criminology

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 119–140 | Cite as

Keeping the ‘Lady’ Safe: The Regulation of Femininity through Crime Prevention Literature

  • Alex Campbell

Abstract

Rape and the fear of rape have been understood by numerous feminists as an ideological weapon used by men to subordinate women. This paper argues that this analysis of power is overly reductive. The omnipresent threat of rape for women encourages them to engage in multiple ‘safe-keeping’ acts which have come to be a performative condition of normative femininity. These restrictive bodily acts (not dressing in certain ways, avoiding certain public locales) promoted through some strands of rape prevention literature, are not merely a reaction to the reality of rape, rather, these advisory narratives unwittingly operate to install rape as a fixed reality. Rape prevention literature (re)produces gendered bodies – the vulnerable/indefensible feminine and the potent/unstoppable masculine – which does not disrupt the possibility of rape, more exactly, it makes rape seem evermore inevitable and unstoppable.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aardvarc (2004). About Women and Marketing, 1/31/1996 9(7), 1–3. On-line http://www.aardvarc.org/Google Scholar
  2. Bart, P., Beneke, T. 1982Men on RapeSt. Martin’s PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Bohmer, C., Parrot, A. 1993Sexual Assault on Campus: The Problem and the SolutionMacmillanNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Bordo, S. 1991

    Docile bodies, rebellious bodies: foucauldian perspectives on female psychopathology

    Hugh, Silverman eds. Writing the Politics of DifferenceSUNY PressNew York
    Google Scholar
  5. Brantingham, Patricia L., Brantingham, Paul J. 1990Situational crime prevention in practiceCanadian Journal of Criminology321740Google Scholar
  6. Butler, J. 1990Gender Trouble: Subversion and IdentityRoutledgeLondon and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler, J. 1993Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of SexRoutledge New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Cahill, A. 2001Rethinking RapeCornell University PressIthacaGoogle Scholar
  9. Clarke, R.V., Felson, M. 1993Routine activity and rational choice, Advances in Criminology Theory, Vol. 5Transaction Publishers, IncNew BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarke, R., Mayhew, P. 1980Designing Out CrimeHome OfficeLondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen, L.E., Felson, M. 1979Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activities approachAmerican Sociological Review44588605Google Scholar
  12. Cosmopolitan (2000). SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  13. Craven, D. 1997Sex Differences in Violent VictimizationUS Department of JusticeWashingtonGoogle Scholar
  14. Dekeseredy, W., Burshtyn, H., Gordon, C. 1992Taking woman abuse seriously: a critical response to the solicitor general of Canada’s crime prevention adviceInternational Review of Victimology2157167Google Scholar
  15. Dowling, C. 2000The Frailty Myth: Redefining the Physical Potential of Women and GirlsRandom House Trade PaperbacksNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Fausto-Sterling, A. 2000Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of SexualityBasic BooksNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Foucault, M. 1977Discipline and PunishPenguin LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Gardner, C. 1990Safe conduct: women, crime, and self in public placesSocial Problems37311328Google Scholar
  19. Gauntlett, D. 2002Media, Gender, and Identity: An IntroductionRoutledge London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., Signorelli, N. 1980Violence Profile No 11: Trends in Network Television Drama and Viewer Conceptions of Social Reality 1967–1979The Annenberg School of Communications, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  21. Grauerholz, E. (1989). The Repeated Crime of Intra-Familial Rape. North Central Sociological AssociationGoogle Scholar
  22. Grosz, E. 1994Volatile Bodies: Towards a Corporeal FeminismIndiana University PressBloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  23. Grosz, E. 1995Space, Time, and PerversionRoutledgeLondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Haber, H. (1996). Body politics and the muscled woman. In S. Hekman (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of Michel Foucault. Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 135–158Google Scholar
  25. Hanmer, J., Saunders, S. 1984Well-Founded FearHutchinsonLondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Hollander, J. 2004‘I can Take Care of Myself’. The impact of self-defence training on women’s livesViolence Against Women103205235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jewkes, R. 2002Intimate partner violence: causes and preventionThe Lancet3599315Google Scholar
  28. Kapur, R. 2002The tragedy of victimization rhetoric: resurrecting the native in international/post-colonial feminist legal politicsHarvard Human Rights Journal15137Google Scholar
  29. Kilpatrick, D., Edmunds, C., Seymour, A. 1992Rape in America: A Report to the NationNational Victim CentreArlington, VAGoogle Scholar
  30. Lauritsen, J., Schaum, R. 2004The social ecology of violence against womenCriminology422323Google Scholar
  31. MacKinnon, C. 1987Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and LawHarvard University Press CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. Madden Margaret, E., Sokol, Thomas J. 1997Teaching women self-defence: pedagogical issuesFeminist Teacher11133151Google Scholar
  33. Madden, M., Sokol, T. 1997Teaching women self-defence: pedagogical issuesFeminist Teacher11133158Google Scholar
  34. Madriz, E. 1997Nothing Bad Happens to Good Girls: Fear of Crime in Women’s LivesUniversity of California Press Berkeley and LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Marcus, S. 1992

    Fighting Bodies, Fighting Words: A Theory of Politics of Rape Prevention

    Butler, J.Scott, J. eds. Feminists Theorize the PoliticalRoutledgeLondon385403
    Google Scholar
  36. Mawby, R., Walkgate, S. 1994Critical VictimologySageLondonGoogle Scholar
  37. Mynatt, C., Allgeier, E. 1990Risk factors, self-attributions, and adjustment problems among victims of sexual coercionJournal of Applied Social Psychology20130153Google Scholar
  38. Naffine, N. 1997Feminism and CriminologyPolity Press CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  39. O’Malley, P. 1996

    Risk and Responsibility

    Barry, T.Osborne, A.Rose, N. eds. Foucault and Political ReasonUCL PressLondon
    Google Scholar
  40. Pineau, L. 1989Date rape: a feminist analysisLaw and Philosophy821743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rabinow, P. 1991The Foucault ReaderPenguinLondonGoogle Scholar
  42. Radford, J. (1987). Policing male violence. In J. Hanmer and Maynard M. (eds), Women, Violence and Social Control. Macmillan, pp. 30–45Google Scholar
  43. Rich, A. 1980

    Compulsory heterosexuality and the lesbian existence

    Simpson, C.Spector, E. eds. Women: Sex and SexualityChicago University PressChicago6291
    Google Scholar
  44. Sanders, W. 1980Rape and Women’s IdentitySage PublicationsBeverley HillsGoogle Scholar
  45. Stanko, E. 1990

    When precaution is normal

    Gelsthorpe, L.Morris, A. eds. Feminist Approaches in CriminologyOpen University PressMilton Keynes
    Google Scholar
  46. Storey, J. (1993). An Introductory Guide to Cultural Theory and Popular CultureGoogle Scholar
  47. Tewksbury, R., Musatine, , Ehrhardt, E. 2001Lifestyle factors associated with the sexual assault of men: a routine activity theory analysisThe Journal of Men’s Studies9153178Google Scholar
  48. The Suzy Lamplugh Trust1999Living Safely: Personal Safety in Your Everyday LifeThe Suzy Lamplugh TrustLondonGoogle Scholar
  49. Thornhill, R., Palmer, C. 2000A Natural History of Rape: Biological Bases of Sexual CoercionMIT PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  50. Sanday, P. 1981The social context of rape: a cross cultural studyJournal of Social Issues37527Google Scholar
  51. Shugart, H. (1994). The Missing Text: Rape and Women’s Sexuality in Women and Language, Vol. 17, 1st MarchGoogle Scholar
  52. Ullman, S., Knight, R. 1992Fighting back: women’s resistance to rapeJournal of Interpersonal Violence73143Google Scholar
  53. Warr, M. 1985Fear of rape among urban womenSocial Problems32238250Google Scholar
  54. White, J., Post, L. 2003

    Understanding Rape: A Metatheoretical Framework

    Travis, C. eds. Evolution, Gender and RapeMIT PressMassachusetts
    Google Scholar
  55. Widom, C. and Maxfield, M. (1984). Sex roles and the victimization of women: evidence from the British Crime SurveyGoogle Scholar
  56. Wood, J. (1999). That wasn’t the real him. Communication Quarterly 7(3)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alex Campbell
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of New EnglandUSA

Personalised recommendations