Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The acquisition of legitimacy for civilian policing: A case study of pedophile hunting groups

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The state has encouraged civilians to take control of their own security through partnership and self-governance. Resultantly, civilians involved in the provision of security are attempting to obtain legitimacy for their civilian policing efforts. To investigate the acquisition of legitimacy for civilian policing, this article analyses comments (n = 1036) from an e-petition launched by a pedophile hunting group seeking legality for their enforcement operations. Because the e-petition eventually became dominated by QAnon conspiracy followers, the article also examines the QAnon movement in relation to civilian policing. The findings provide insight into justifications for the legality of civilian policing that are supplied by the general public in their efforts to support such groups, the process of de-legitimatization of the policing capabilities of the state, and the risks of what I call legitimacy tethering, linking civilian policing initiatives to radical groups such as QAnon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayling, J., Grabosky, P., & Shearing, C. (2009). Lengthening the arm of the law: Enhancing police resources in the twenty-first century. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayley, D. H., & Shearing, C. D. (1996). The future of policing. Law and Society Review, 30, 585–606.

  • BBC. (2019, November 6). Police concerns over rise of ‘paedophile hunters’. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-50302912

  • BBC. (2020, November 13). Dutch police give ‘stop paedophile hunts’ warning after Arnhem death. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-54930488

  • Beetham, D. (1991). The legitimation of power. Atlantic highlands. Humanuties Fress International.

  • Bennett, T., Holloway, K., & Farrington, D. (2008). The effectiveness of neighborhood watch. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, B., Huq, A., Jackson, J., & Roberts, B. (2014). What price fairness when security is at stake? Police legitimacy in South Africa. Regulation & Governance, 8(2), 246–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, R., & Grabosky, P. (2014). The unraveling of public security in the United States: The dark side of police-community co-production. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(1), 139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. M. (1975). Strain of violence: Historical studies of American violence and vigilantism. Oxford University Press.

  • Bullock, K., & Sindall, K. (2014). Examining the nature and extent of public participation in neighbourhood policing. Policing and Society, 24(4), 385–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, E. (2016). Policing paedophilia: Assembling bodies, spaces and things. Crime Media Culture, 12(3), 345–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, C. T., Wohn, D. Y., & Hayes, R. A. (2016). Likes as social support: Relational closeness, automaticity, and interpreting social support from paralinguistic digital affordances in social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 385–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, L. Y., & Leung, A. K. (2015). An introduction to cyber crowdsourcing (human flesh search) in the Greater China region. In R. G. Smith, R. C.-C. Cheung, & L. Y.-C. Lau (Eds.), Cybercrime risks and responses (pp. 240–252). Springer.

  • Chang, L. Y., & Poon, R. (2017). Internet vigilantism: Attitudes and experiences of university students toward cyber crowdsourcing in Hong Kong. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61(16), 1912–1932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, L. Y., Zhong, L. Y., & Grabosky, P. N. (2018). Citizen co-production of cyber security: Self‐help, vigilantes, and cybercrime. Regulation & Governance, 12(1), 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darian-Smith, E. (1993). Neighborhood watch-who watches whom? Reinterpreting the concept of neighborhood. Human Organization, 52(1), 83–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J. M., & Pittman, T. S. (2003). The psychology of compensatory and retributive justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 324–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Rond, M., Lok, J., & Marrison, A. (2021). To catch a predator: The lived experience of extreme practices. Academy of Management Journal, 65(3), 870–902.

  • Draucker, C. B., Stern, P. N., Burgess, A. W., & Campbell, J. C. (2000). Women’s responses to sexual violence by male intimates. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 22(4), 385–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • e Silva, K. (2018). Vigilantism and cooperative criminal justice: Is there a place for cybersecurity vigilantes in cybercrime fighting? International Review of Law Computers & Technology, 32(1), 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garland, D. (2012). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. University of Chicago Press.

  • Goodyear, S. (2016, October 11). Creep catcher vigilantes under fire over death of mentally ill woman in video. CBC. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/creep-catcher-katelynn-mcknight-vigilante-justice-1.3794017

  • Grabosky, P. (2017). Secrecy, transparency and legitimacy in national security and domestic policing (p. 8). Towards open government, Indonesian Association for Public Administration International Conference, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/159841012.pdf#page=30

  • Grabosky, P., & Urbas, G. (2019). Online undercover investigations and the role of private third parties. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 13(1), 38–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groff, E. R., Johnson, L., Ratcliffe, J. H., & Wood, J. (2013). Exploring the relationship between foot and car patrol in violent crime areas. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 36(1), 119–139.

  • Haasch, P. (2020, March 18). Viral vigilantes are turning youtube and tiktok into a weapon. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2020/3/18/21183662/pedo-hunting-vigilante-youtube-tik-tok-anti-lgbt-viral

  • Hadjimatheou, K. (2021). Citizen-led digital policing and democratic norms: The case of self-styled paedophile hunters. Criminology &Criminal Justice, 21(4), 547–565.

  • Harris, A. J., & Socia, K. M. (2016). What’s in a name? Evaluating the effects of the “sex offender” label on public opinions and beliefs. Sexual Abuse, 28(7), 660–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huey, L., Nhan, J., & Broll, R. (2013). ‘Uppity civilians’ and ‘cyber-vigilantes’: The role of the general public in policing cyber-crime. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 13(1), 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes, M., Roberts, C., Innes, H., Lowe, T., & Lakhani, S. (2011). Assessing the effects of prevent policing. Cardiff University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, L. (2020). Who errs? Algorithm aversion, the source of judicial error, and public support for self-help behaviors. Journal of Crime and Justice, 43(2), 174–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Measuring the reliability of qualitative text analysis data. Quality and Quantity, 38, 787–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, J. S., Brannon, Y. N., Fortney, T., & Baker, J. (2007). Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7(1), 137–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister, S., & Jones, T. (2015). Plural policing and the challenge of democratic accountability. In S. C. Lister & M. Rowe (Eds.), Accountability of policing (pp. 192–213). Routledge Frontiers of Criminal Justice.

  • Loader, I. (2000). Plural policing and democratic governance. Social & Legal Studies, 9(3), 323–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loeffler, E., & Bovaird, T. (2020). Assessing the impact of co-production on pathways to outcomes in public services: The case of policing and criminal justice. International Public Management Journal, 23(2), 205–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loveluck, B. (2019). The many shades of digital vigilantism. A typology of online self-justice. Global Crime,21(3–4), 1–29.

  • Lub, V. (2018). Neighbourhood watch: Mechanisms and moral implications. The British Journal of Criminology, 58(4), 906–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, K. D., & Kracher, B. (2008). A conceptual framework for online business protest tactics and criteria for their effectiveness. Business & Society, 47(3), 291–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mbhele, B. (2022, April 24). Seven men accused of murdering Zimbabwean Elvis Nyathi in Diepsloot back in dock. Eyewitness news. https://ewn.co.za/2022/04/25/seven-men-accused-of-murdering-zimbabwean-elvis-nyathi-in-diepsloot-back-in-dock

  • McConville, M., & Shepherd, D. (2005). Watching police, watching communities. Routledge.

  • Milmo, C. (2019, November 7). Paedophile-hunter groups staging 100 ‘stings’ per month – and endangering law enforcement investigations, police warn. inews. https://inews.co.uk/news/uk/paedophile-hunter-groups-staging-100-stings-per-month-and-endangering-law-enforcement-investigations-police-warn-360294

  • Mols, A., & Pridmore, J. (2019). When citizens are “actually doing police work”: The blurring of boundaries in WhatsApp neighbourhood crime prevention groups in The Netherlands. Surveillance & Society, 17(3/4), 272–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nhan, J., Huey, L., & Broll, R. (2017). Digilantism: An analysis of crowdsourcing and the Boston marathon bombings. The British Journal of Criminology, 57(2), 341–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • npr. (2016, April 17). 3 years after Boston marathon bombing, the story of a wrongly accused student. npr. https://www.npr.org/2016/04/17/474569118/3-years-after-boston-marathon-bombing-the-story-of-a-wrongly-accused-student

  • Oldenquist, A. (1988). An explanation of retribution. The Journal of Philosophy, 85(9), 464–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papasavva, A., Blackburn, J., Stringhini, G., Zannettou, S., & De Cristofaro, E. (2020). “Is it a qoincidence?”: A First step towards understanding and characterizing the QAnon movement on Voat.co arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.04885.

  • Peel, R. (1829). Sir Robert Peel’s principles of law enforcement 1829. https://www.durham.police.uk/About-Us/Documents/Peels_Principles_Of_Law_Enforcement.pdf

  • Purshouse, J. (2020). ‘Paedophile Hunters’, criminal procedure, and fundamental human rights. Journal of Law and Society, 47(3), 384–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, K., & McCartan, K. (2018). Public views about reintegrating child sex offenders via Circles of Support and Accountability (COSA): A qualitative analysis. Deviant behavior, 39(3), 400–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roose, K. (2020, September 28). How ‘save the children’ is keeping qanon alive. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/28/technology/save-the-children-qanon.html

  • Rose, N., & Miller, P. (1992). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 173–205.

  • SANGONeT (2010, 20 October). It takes a village to raise a child. http://www.ngopulse.org/article/it-takes-village-raise-child

  • Schneider, C. J., & Trottier, D. (2012). The 2011 Vancouver riot and the role of Facebook in crowd-sourced policing. BC Studies, 175, 57–72.

  • Smallridge, J., Wagner, P., & Crowl, J. N. (2016). Understanding cyber-vigilantism: A conceptual framework. Journal of Theoretical & Philosophical Criminology,8(1), 57–70.

  • Smith, H. P., & Alpert, G. P. (2011). Joint policing: Third parties and the use of force. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal, 12(2), 136–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. (2017, September 18). Most say police and paedophile-hunters should link up if it puts more behind bars. YouGov. https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2017/09/18/most-brits-say-police-working-vigilante-paedophile

  • Trottier, D. (2017). Digital vigilantism as weaponisation of visibility. Philosophy & Technology, 30(1), 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trottier, D., Gabdulhakov, R., & Huang, Q. (2020). Introducing vigilant audiences. Open Book Publishers.

  • Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Fagan, J. (2008). Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 231–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. Russell Sage Foundation.

  • van Steden, R., & Mehlbaum, S. (2021). Do-it-yourself surveillance: The practices and effects of WhatsApp Neighbourhood Crime Prevention groups. Crime, Media, Culture. https://doi.org/10.1177/17416590211041017

  • Westmarland, L. (2010). Dodgy customers? Can the police ever trust the public? Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 4(3), 291–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. (2005). ‘Caught between a rock and a hard place’: Police experiences with the legitimacy of street watch partnerships. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 44(5), 527–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiltshire, J. (2019, 11 January). How paedophile hunters make things worse for the children they want to protect. Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/paedophile-hunters-police-crime-law-internet-social-media-children-victims-a8723156.html

  • Wood, J., & Shearing, C. (2013). Imagining security. Routledge.

  • Yardley, E., Lynes, A. G. T., Wilson, D., & Kelly, E. (2018). What’s the deal with ‘websleuthing’? News media representations of amateur detectives in networked spaces. Crime Media Culture, 14(1), 81–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This manuscript was greatly improved by the insightful comments of Eric Jardine, James Hawdon, Thomas Dearden, Katalin Parti, and the anonymous reviewers. Any remaining errors are my own.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mount Royal University, Calgary, AB, Canada

    Leanna Ireland

Authors
  1. Leanna Ireland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leanna Ireland.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no financial or non-financial interests that are in conflict to the work submitted for publication. No funding was received for this manuscript. The manuscript is not submitted or published elsewhere for consideration.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ireland, L. The acquisition of legitimacy for civilian policing: A case study of pedophile hunting groups. Crime Law Soc Change 79, 195–216 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-022-10045-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-022-10045-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation