Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

“You’re a product of your environment for sure”: Correctional educators on their perceptions of and contributions to prison social climate

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most criminal justice research pertaining to social climate in U.S. prisons has focused on the experiences of incarcerated people and correctional officers, with no studies to our knowledge that explore correctional educators’ significant contributions to prison social climate. Utilizing results from semi-structured interviews and participant observation with correctional educators in institutions managed by eight different state prison administrations, the present study fills this knowledge gap by examining two questions. First, how do correctional educators characterize the life experiences and motivations of incarcerated people who are pursuing an education? Second, how do correctional educators variously regard their respective professional roles as influencing and/or intervening in incarcerated individuals’ lives? Taken together, these findings offer insights into the nuanced ways that correctional educators interpret and understand compound disadvantage among incarcerated people, prison social climate, and motivations for engaging in correctional education. Our recommendations indicate the utility of fostering a collaborative, peer-driven learning environment by including current and former prisoners in education and programming initiatives, and prioritizing sustainable education in a humane institutional environment through recruitment of skilled professional staff willing to engage in cross-professional dialogue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allred, S., Harrison, L., & O’Connell, D. (2013). Self-efficacy: An important aspect of prison-based learning. The Prison Journal, 93(2), 211–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anders, A. D., & Noblit, G. W. (2011). Understanding effective higher education programs in prisons: Considerations from the incarcerated individuals program in North Carolina. Journal of Correctional Education, 62(2), 77–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auty, K., & Liebling, A. (2019). Exploring the relationship between prison social climate and reoffending. Justice Quarterly, 37(2), 358–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, L., & Sandoval, L. (2018). “Being a presence to each other”: Adult educators who Foster empowerment with incarcerated women. Adult Education Quarterly, 68(4), 263–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayliss, P. (2016). Learning behind bars: Time to liberate prison education. Studies in the Education of Adults, 35(2), 157–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J., & Shuker, R. (2018). Hope, harmony and humanity: Creating a positive social climate in a democratic therapeutic community prison and the implications for penal practice. Journal of Criminal Psychology, 8(1), 44–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blagden, N., Winder, B., & Hames, C. (2016). “They treat us like human beings”: Experiencing a therapeutic sex offenders prison: Impact on prisoners and staff and implications for treatment. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60(4), 371–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Justice Statistics. 2018. Prisoners in 2017. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/p17.pdf

  • Carrigan, J., & Maunsell, C. (2014). ‘Never really had a good education you know, until I came in Here’: Educational life histories of young adult male prisoner learners. Irish Educational Studies, 33(4), 399–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, L., & Harrison, L. (2016). Democracy and the challenges of correctional education. Journal of Correctional Education, 67(1), 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro, E., & Brawn, M. (2017). Critiquing critical pedagogies inside the prison classroom: A dialogue between student and teacher. Harvard Educational Review, 87(1), 99–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cormac, B. (2014). Learning to escape: Prison education, rehabilitation and the potential for transformation. Journal of Prison Education and Reentry, 1(1), 20–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croux, F., Brosens, D., Vandelvedle, S., & De Donder, L. (2018). Foreign National Prisoners in Flanders (Belgium): Motivations and barriers to participation in prison programs. European Journal on Criminal Policy & Research, 25(2), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L., Steele, J., Bozick, R., Williams, M., Turner, S., Miles, J., Saunders, J., & Steinberg, P. (2014). How effective is correctional education, and where do we go from Here? The results of a comprehensive. Rand Corporation.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Devilly, G., Sorbello, L., Eccleston, L., & Ward, T. (2005). Peer-based prison education schemes. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 219–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D., Pelletier, E., & Szkola, J. (2018). Education in prison and the self-stigma: Empowerment continuum. Crime & Delinquency, 64(2), 255–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, R. (Ed.). (2019). Critical perspectives on teaching in prison. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goomany, A., & Dickinson, T. (2015). The influence of prison climate on the mental health of adult prisoners: A literature review. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 22(6), 413–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, M., & Spearlt. (2014). Twenty years after the education apocalypse: The ongoing fall out from the 1994 omnibus crime bill. St. Louis University Public Law Review, 33, 283–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P., & Chong, M. (2018). A Prison’s social climate, and its impact on reintegration and recidivism. James Cook University Law Review, 24, 231–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, V. (2010). Essential, desirable or optional? Making distance e-learning courses available to those without internet access. European Journal of Open, Distance and E- Learning: 11 pages, available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ914968

  • Hartnett, S. J., Novek, E., & Wood, J. (Eds.). (2013). Working for justice: A handbook of prison education and activism. University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, Jo, Ilona Murphy, and Manuel Souto-Otero. 2013. Prison education and training in Europe: Current state-of-play and challenges. European Commission http://www.antoniocasella.eu/nume/Hawley_UE_education_may13.pdf

  • Hughes, E. (2012). Education in prison: Studying through distance learning. Ashgate Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpowitz, D. (2017). College in Prison: Reading in an age of mass incarceration. Rutgers University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, D. (2014). Punish or reform? Predicting prison staff Punitiveness. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 53(1), 49–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirp, D. (2021). Building the prison-to-college pipeline. The Nation, June 25. https://www.thenation.com/article/society/prison-education-college/

  • Larson, D. (2015). Localizing prison higher education. Pages 89-100 in Robert Scott, ed. bringing college education into prisons: New directions for community colleges 170. San Francisco: Jossey-bass.

  • LeBel, T. (2012). “If one Doesn’t get you another one will”: Formerly incarcerated People’s perceptions of stigma. Prison Journal, 92(1), 63–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lempert, L. B., Bergeron, S., & Linker, M. (2005). Negotiating the politics of space: Teaching Women's studies in a Women's prison. NWSA Journal, 17(2), 199–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, S., Nally, J., Ho, T., & Knutson, K. (2012). The effect of correctional education of post-release employment and recidivism: A five year follow-up study in the state of Indiana. Crime and Delinquency, 58(3), 380–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Looney, A., & Turner, N. (2018). Work and opportunity before and after incarceration. The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, Doris. (2008). Structure and components of successful education programs. Reentry Roundtable on Education at John Jay College. http://www.educationjustice.net/home/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Mackenzie-2008.pdf

  • Manger, T., Eikeland, O.-J., Diseth, A., Hetland, H., & Asbjornsen, A. (2010). Prison inmates’ educational motives: Are they pushed or pulled? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 54(6), 535–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthew, D. (2011). The absence of ‘e’: The role of the internet in two distance learning programs. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 16(4), 479–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreira, J.-A., Reis-Monteiro, A., & Machado, A. (2017). Higher education distance learning and e-learning in prisons in Portugal. Communicar, 51(25), 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nutbrown, C., Clough, P., Stammers, L., Emblin, N., & Alston-Smith, S. (2019). Family literacy in prisons: Fathers’ engagement with their young children. Research Papers in Education, 34(2), 169–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panitsides, E., & Moussiou, E. (2019). What does it take to motivate inmates to participate in prison education? An exploratory study in a Greek prison. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 25(2), 157–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastore, G. (2018). Inclusion and social exclusion issues in university education in prison: Considerations based on the Italian and Spanish experiences. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22(12), 1272–1287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pike, A., & Adams, A. (2012). Digital exclusion or learning exclusion? An ethnographic study of adult male distance learners in English prisons. Research in Learning Technology, 20, 363–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reisig, M., & Mesko, G. (2009). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and prisoner misconduct. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15(1), 41–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schalast, N., & Laan, J. (2017). Measuring social climate in German prisons using the Essen climate evaluation Schema. The Prison Journal, 97(2), 166–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, R. (2018). The concept of reducing recidivism via college-in-prison: Thoughts on data collection, methodology, and the question of purpose. Critical Education, 9(18), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, S., & Page, J. (2014). Bureaucrat on the cell block: Prison officers’ perceptions of work environment and attitudes toward prisoners. Social Service Review, 88(4), 630–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Kaap-Deeder, J., Audenaart, E., van Petegem, S., van Mastrigt, S., Aelterman, N., & Vansteenskiste, M. (2019). The internalization of and Defiance against rules within prison: The role of correctional officers’ autonomy-supportive and controlling communications style as perceived by prisoners. Motivation and Emotion, 43, 771–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade-Olson, J. (2019). Race, staff, and punishment: Representative bureaucracy in American state prisons. Administration & Society, 51(9), 1397–1424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A. (2007). “I go to get away from the cockroaches”: Educentricity and the politics of education in prisons. Journal of Correctional Education, 58(2), 185–203.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan Dewey.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dewey, S., Prohaska, A. “You’re a product of your environment for sure”: Correctional educators on their perceptions of and contributions to prison social climate. Crime Law Soc Change 77, 431–450 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-021-09999-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-021-09999-2

Navigation