Energy and the Anthropocene: security challenges and solutions

Article

Abstract

This paper explores the role that energy regimes, and the search for energy security, has had in shaping humans and their societies, and the effects thereof. Energy enrolments through the domestication of plants and animals and the extraction and burning of increasingly energy- rich fuels enabled humans to build ever more productive and formidable societies, but also more complex and divided ones. Social stratification, combined with the new risks caused by the more intense interactions and entanglements that emerged between humans and nature, has culminated in the global environmental crises that humans are now facing. We conclude by arguing that an escape route from the destructive consequences that fossil fuel energy regimes have had for humans and their ecological security is provided by the emergence of electrical civilizations and the potential this provides for integrating energy and ecological securities.

Keywords

Energy Security Anthropocene 

References

  1. 1.
    Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P., & van den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harrington, C., & Shearing, C. (2017). Security and the Anthropocene: Reflections on safety and care. New York: Transcript.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zedner, L. (2009). Security. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clarke, N., & Yusoff, K. (2014). Combustion and society: A fire-Centred history of energy use. Theory, Culture & Society, 3(5), 203–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hartmann, T. (1999). The last hours of ancient sunlight: Waking up to personal and global transformation. New York: Harmony Books.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sieferle, R. P. (2001). The subterranean Forest. Energy systems and the industrial revolution. Cambridge: The White Horse Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marx, K. (1909). Capital: A critique of political economy (Vol. 1). Chicago: Charles H. Kerr & Company.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fischer-Kowalski, M., Krausmann, F., & Pallua, I. (2014). A socio-metabolic reading of the Anthropocene: Modes of subsistence, population size and human impact on earth. The Anthropocene Review, XX, 1–26.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Harari, Y. N. (2014). Sapiens. A brief history of humankind. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goudsblom, J. (1992a). The civilizing process and the domestication of fire. Journal of World History, 3(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goudsblom, J. (1992b). Fire and civilization. London: Alan Lane.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bird-David, N. (2006). Animistic epistemology: Why do some hunter-gatherers not depict animals? Ethnos, 71(1), 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pausas, J. G., & Keeley, E. (2009). A burning story: The role of fire in the history of humans. Bioscience, 59(7), 593–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Diamond, J. (1997). Guns, germs and steel. A short history of everybody for the last 13.000 years. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Diamond, J. (2005). Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Clarke, G. (2012). Review essay: The enlightened economy. An economic history of Britain, 1700-1850 by Joel Mokyr. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(1), 95–95.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wrigley, E. A. (2010). Energy and the English industrial revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Weisz, H. (2011). The probability of the improbable: Society-nature coevolution. Geografiska Annaler, Series B, 325–336.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hildyard, N., Lohmann, L., & Sexton, S. (2012). Energy security. For whom? For what? Dorset, UK: The Corner House.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fischer-Kowalski, M., & Haberl, H. (1998). Sustainable development: Socio-economic metabolism and the colonization of nature. UNESCO: International Social Science Journal, 158, 573–587.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Urry, J. (2014). The problem of energy. Theory, Culture and Society, 31(5), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pomeranz, K. (2000). The great divergence. China, Europe and the making of the modern world economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bonneuil, C. (2015). The geological turn: Narratives for the Anthropocene. In C. Hamilton, F. Germenne, & C. Benneuil (Eds.), The Anthropocene and the global environmental crisis. Rethinking modernity in a new epoch (pp. 15–31). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marks, R. B. (2002). Origins of the modern world: A global and ecological narrative. Washington DC: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mitchell, T. (2011). Carbon democracy. Political power in the age of oil. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kocka, J. (2016). Capitalism. A short history. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rosa, E. A., & Machlis, G. E. (1983). Energetic theories of society: An evaluative review. Sociological Inquiry, 53(2–3), 152–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    White, L. A. (1943). Energy and the evolution of culture. American Anthropologist, 45(3), Part 1), 335–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cottrell, F. (1955). Energy and society. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Daly, H. E. (1977). Steady-state economics. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971). The entropy law and the economic process. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. (1972). The limits to growth. New York: Universe Books.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    de Vries, B., & Goudsblom, J. (2003). Humans and their habitats in a long-term socio-ecological perspective: Myths, maps, and models. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Patterson, W. P. (2015). Electricity vs Fire. The Fight for our Future. Amersham Bucks: Walt Patterson.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hughes, T. P. (1983). Networks of power. Electrification in western society, 1880–1930. London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin III, F. S., Lambin, E., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H., Nykvist, B., De Wit, C. A., Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P. K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R. W., Fabry, V. J., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, K., Crutzen, P., & Foley, J. (2009). Planetary boundaries:Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2), 32. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art32/ Accessed 5 April 2017.
  37. 37.
    Hirsh, R. F. (1989). Technology and transformation in the American utility industry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jewell, J. (2013). Energy security and climate changer mitigation: The interaction in long-term scenarios. PhD Dissertation, Central European University, Budapest, Hungary.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Berst, J., with Bane, P., Burkhalter, M., & Zheng, A. (2008). The electricity economy. New Opportunities from the Transformation of the Electric Power Sector. Global Environmental Fund and Global Smart Energy. http://www.terrawatts.com/electricity-economy.pdf. Accessed 4 April 2017.
  40. 40.
    March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Commoner, B. (1976). The poverty of power. Energy and the economic crisis. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lovins, A. B. (1977). Soft energy paths. Toward a durable peace. New York: Harper Colophon Books.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Midttun, A. (1988). The negotiated political economy of a heavy industrial sector: The Norwegian hydropower complex in the 1970s and 1980s. Scandinavian Political Studies, 11(2), 115–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Raw, B. (2016). Eskom, dump and outdated business model. Mail & Guardian, December 15.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Baker, L., & Wlokas, H. (2014). South Africa’s Renewable Energy Procurement: A New Frontier. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Working Paper 159.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Eberhard, A., Kolker, J., & Leigland, J. (2014). South Africa’s renewable energy IPP procurement program: Success factors and lessons. Washington, DC: Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Moe, E. (2015). Renewable energy transformation or fossil fuel backlash. Vested interests in the political economy. New York: Palgrave McMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Farrell, J. (2016). Beyond sharing: How communities can take ownership of renewable power. Washington DC.: Institute for Local Self-Reliance’s Energy Democratic Initiative.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Nye, D. (2014). The United States and alternative energies since 1980: Technological fix or regime change? Theory, Culture and Society, 31(5), 103–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mazzucato, M. (2013). The entrepreneurial state. Debunking the Public vs. Private Sector Myths. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Farrell, J., Grimley, M., & Stumo-Langer, N. (2016). Re-member-ing the cooperative way. Washington DC.: Institute for Local Self Reliance’s Energy Democratic Initiative.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hippel, D. V., Williams, J. H., Kahrl, F., & Hayes, P. (2012). Energy security (East Asia). In R. Anderson (Ed.), The Berkshire encyclopedia of sustainability, China, India and east and South-East Asia: Assessing sustainability (Vol. 7, pp. 143–150). Great Barrington: Berkshire Publishing.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Spratt, S., Dong, W., Krishna, C., Sagar, A., & Ye, Q. (2014). What drives wind and solar energy Investments in India and China, Institute of Development Studies, UK, Evidence Report No. 87.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Newell, P., & Paterson, M. (1998). A climate for business: Global warming, the state and capital. Review of International Political Economy, 5(4), 679–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Geels, F. W. (2014). Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: Introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(5), 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Buzogány, Aron & Stefan Ćetković. (2015). Varieties of capitalism and renewable energy development in the European Union: Towards a common but differentiated approach prepared in relation to the conference. Unpublished paper presented at The 2020 Strategy Experience: Lessons for Regional Cooperation, EU Governance and Investment. Berlin, 17 June 2015. https://www.diw.de/documents/dokumentenarchiv/17/diw_01.c.508438.de/cetkovic.pdf . Accessed 15 May 2017.
  57. 57.
    Soskice, D., & Hall, P. A. (Eds.). (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Administration and Organizational TheoryUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
  2. 2.Universities of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa
  3. 3.Universities of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  4. 4.Durban University of TechnologyDurbanSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations