Advertisement

Crime, Law and Social Change

, Volume 68, Issue 5, pp 493–498 | Cite as

From passengers to crew: introductory reflections

  • Cameron HarringtonEmail author
  • Emma Lecavalier
  • Clifford Shearing
Article

It is only very recently that we humans have come to recognize our place on this Earth. As Marshall McLuhan once put it: “On Spaceship Earth there are no passengers; everybody is a member of the crew” ([1], p. 50). While we have never been simply passengers, our status as crew has mattered little for almost all of human history; to paraphrase Harari [2] we have been decidedly “insignificant” crew members. This changed drastically with our capture of fossil fuels, or “ancient sunlight” as Hartmann [3] calls it, to drive the machine of successive industrial revolutions [4]. Thanks to these developments, the Earth has transitioned out of the Holocene and into what is now being termed the Anthropocene, an age in which our status as crew members is hugely significant. We have become “geological actors” [5] whose actions have shaped, and are reshaping, the systems that have kept Spaceship Earth on its course for some 10, 000 years. The consequences of this new era are both profoundly global...

Notes

Acknowledgements

Cameron Harrington, Emma Lecavalier, and Clifford Shearing would like to thank the participants and authors for their contributions. Special thanks go to Ricky Röntsch for managing and editing the Special Issue and Elaine Atkins for her assistance.

We acknowledge funding support from the South Africa-Norway Research Cooperation (SANCOOP) Fund, the National Research Foundation of South Africa. Any opinion, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed herein are ours alone and the agencies do not accept any liability in regard thereto.

References

  1. 1.
    McLuhan, M. (1974). At the moment of Sputnik the planet became a global theater in which there are no spectators but only actors. Journal of Communication, 24(1), 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harari, Y. (2014). Sapiens: A brief history of humankind. London: Harvill Secker.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hartmann, T. (1999). The last hours of ancient sunlight: Waking up to personal and global transformation. New York: Harmony Books.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marks, R. (2006). Origins of the modern world: A global and ecological narrative from the fifteenth to the twenty-first century (2nd ed.). Lanham: Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chakrabarty, D. (2009). The climate of history: Four theses. Critical Inquiry, 35(2), 197–222 Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/596640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    World Meteorological Organization. (2017). WMO statement on the state of the global climate in 2016. WMO No. 1189. http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/1189_Statement2016_EN.pdf. Accessed 22 May 2017.
  7. 7.
    Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L., Gaffney, O., & Ludwig, C. (2015). The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The great acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 2(1), 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zeebe, R. E., Ridgwell, A., & Zachos, J. C. (2016). Anthropogenic carbon release rate unprecedented during the past 66 million years. Nature Geoscience, 9, 325–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). (2017). NASA, NOAA Data Show 2016 Warmest Year on Record Globally. https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-noaa-data-show-2016-warmest-year-on-record-globally. Accessed 22 May 2017.
  10. 10.
    Kolbert, E. (2014). The sixth extinction: An unnatural history. New York: Henry Holt & Company.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Green, J. F., & Hale, T. N. (2017). Reversing the marginalization of global environmental politics in international relations: An opportunity for the discipline. PS: Political Science & Politics, 50(2), 473–479.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Winkelmann, R., Levermann, A., Ridgwell, A., & Caldeira, K. (2015). Combustion of available fossil fuel resources sufficient to eliminate the Antarctic Ice Sheet. Science Advances, 1(8), e1500589. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    De Vos, J. M., Joppa, L. N., Gittleman, J. L., Stephens, P. R., & Pimm, S. L. (2015). Estimating the normal background rate of species extinction. Conservation Biology, 29(2), 452–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harrington, C. (2016). The ends of the world: International relations and the Anthropocene. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 44(3), 478–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Taffel, S., & Holm, N. (2017). Introduction: Ecological crises, nonhumans, and the age of man. In S. Taffel & N. Holm (Eds.), Ecological entanglements in the Anthropocene: Working with nature (pp. ix–xxv). London: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Latour, B. (2014). Agency at the Time of the Anthropocene. New Literary History, 45(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wendt, A. (2015). Quantum mind and social science: Unifying physical and social ontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Born, M. (Ed.). (1971). The Born-Einstein Letters (1st ed.). New York: Walker.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Neep, Daniel. (2016). State-space beyond territory: Wormholes, gravitational fields, and entanglement. Journal of Historical Sociology, 1-30. [online before print 7 June 2016]. doi: 10.1111/johs.12126.
  20. 20.
    Burke, A., Fishel, S., Mitchell, A., Dalby, S., & Levine, D. (2016). Planet politics: A manifesto from the end of IR. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 44(3), 499–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dalby, S. (2016). Framing the Anthropocene: The good, the bad and the ugly. The Anthropocene Review, 3(1), 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fagan, Madeleine. (2016). Security in the anthropocene: Environment, ecology, escape. European Journal of International Relations [published online ahead of print April 7]. doi: 10.1177/1354066116639738.
  23. 23.
    Floyd, R. (2015). Environmental security and the case against rethinking criminology as ‘security-ology’. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 15(3), 277–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hamilton, Scott. (2016). The measure of all things? The Anthropocene as a global biopolitics of carbon. European Journal of International Relations [published online ahead of print December 22]. doi: 10.1177/1354066116683831.
  25. 25.
    Harrington, C., & Shearing, C. (2017). Security in the Anthropocene: Reflections on safety and care. London and Bielefeld: Transcript.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mitchell, A. (2014). Only human? A worldly approach to security. Security Dialogue, 45(1), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shearing, C. (2015). Criminology and the Anthropocene. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 15(3), 255–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Autin, W. J., & Holbrook, J. M. (2012). Is the Anthropocene an issue of stratigraphy or pop culture? GSA Today, 22(7), 60–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cameron Harrington
    • 1
    Email author
  • Emma Lecavalier
    • 2
  • Clifford Shearing
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.School of Government and International AffairsDurham UniversityDurhamUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Institute of Safety Governance and CriminologyUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa
  4. 4.School of Criminology and Criminal Justice; Griffith Criminology InstituteUniversity of GriffithNathanAustralia
  5. 5.École de criminologieUniversité de MontréalMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations