When do anticorruption laws matter? The evidence on public integrity enabling contexts
- 425 Downloads
This paper asks if there is evidence that the most common legislation recommended and used in the current anticorruption toolkit is effective in reducing corruption and if specific contexts can be identified which enable or disable effective legislation for control of corruption. The paper draws on documented public accountability and anticorruption tools from the PAM, the public accountability mechanisms database of the World Bank, and documents additional ones, including an index of anticorruption regulatory density, comprising anticorruption agencies, existence of an Ombudsman, restrictions to party finance legislation and others. While only fiscal transparency and financial disclosures are found to be significant, the interaction of some tools with context elements, such as freedom of the press of independence of the judiciary enhances their impact. The paper argues finally that the effectiveness of some anticorruption tools is strictly dependent on context, especially the existence of the rule of law, while others remain fully insignificant.
- 3.European Commission (2014). REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT EU ANTI-CORRUPTION REPORT, available at https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/organized-crime-and-human-trafficking/corruption/anti-corruption-report_en.
- 4.Fazekas, M., & Cingolani, L. (2016). How (Not) to Use Political Finance Regulations to Counter Public Procurement Corruption (February 1, 2016), available at https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mihaly_Fazekas/publication/303966472_Breaking_the_cycle_How_not_to_use_political_finance_regulations_to_counter_public_procurement_corruption/links/57608edc08aeeada5bc306ce.pdf. Accessed 20 July 2016.
- 6.Hanna, R., Bishop, S., Nadel, S., Scheffler, G., & Durlacher, K. (2011). The effectiveness of anti-corruption policy. EPPI Centre Report.Google Scholar
- 7.Huther, J., & Shah, A. (2000). Anti-corruption policies and programs: a framework for evaluation (vol 2501). Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
- 9.Kusek, J. Z., & Rist, R. C. (2004). Ten steps to a results-based monitoring and evaluation system: A handbook for development practitioners. Washington: World Bank Publications. available at https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/14926 Accessed 23 June 2017
- 10.Lambsdorrf, J. (2008) Good Governance and the Invisible Foot. In: Kottschau, K. and Marauhn, M. (2008) Good governance and developing countries : Interdisciplinary perspectives. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- 11.Messick, R. E., & Kleinfeld, R. (2001). Writing an effective anticorruption law (no. 11362). The World Bank. available at https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/11362. Accessed 23 June 2017.
- 12.Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2015). The quest for good governance: How societies develop control of corruption. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 14.O’Leary, C. (1962). The elimination of corrupt practices in British elections, 1868–1911. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- 16.Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. E. (2005). The economic effects of constitutions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- 19.Treisman, D. (2007). What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research?. Annual Review of Political Science, 10(2007), 211–244.Google Scholar