Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Women in prison: unhealthy lives and denied well-being between loneliness and seclusion

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the well-being of female inmates in Italian prisons. The hypothesis is that stress in women prisoners is strictly related both to “external” networks and “internal” support, and is more linked to the feeling of loneliness than to coping with the difficulties of prison life. Qualitative study involving adult female prisoners in the prisons of three Italian regions (Campania, Lazio, Emilia Romagna). 37 individual semi-structured interviews were conducted. The interviews were processed using the CAQDAS contents (Computer Assisted/Aided Qualitative Data Analysis Software) by the software Atlas.ti, to practice the Grounded Analysis method to attain the construction of categories and its relations. The interviews show multiple levels of reflection, crossbreeding mainly two plans: a situational one and a personal one. The main dimensions emerged are: the access to activities in prison (work, projects, sociality) experienced as a deterrent to depression and as an opportunity for the future reintegration into the “free” society; the motherhood, as a spur to a resilience, but also in reference to the difficulties associated with the conditions of segregation. The main theme that crossed all the conversations is the loneliness lived as a prison disease. More attention should be given to the re-socialization aspect of prisons, constructing new ways to guarantee the prisoners a valid alternative to deviant behaviours so as to help restore family relationships and the reintegration in society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Esposito, M. (2012). Double burden: a qualitative study of unhealthy prisoners in Italy. International Journal of Prisoner Health, 8(1), 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Staton, M., Leukfeld, C., & Logan, T. K. (2001). Health service utilization and victimization among incarcerated female substance users. Substance Use & Misuse, 36, 701–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pratt, D., Piper, M., Appleby, L., Webb, R., & Shaw, J. (2006). Suicide in recently released prisoners: a population-based cohort study. Lancet, 368(9530), 119–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Birecree, E. A., Bloom, J. D., Leverette, M. D., & Williams, M. (1994). Diagnostic efforts regarding women in Oregon’s prison system: a preliminary report. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 38(3), 215–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Langan, N. P., & Pelissier, B. M. M. (2001). Gender differences among prisoners in drug treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse, 12, 291–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Estebanez, P., et al. (2002). The role of prisons in the HIV epidemic among female injecting drug users. AIDS Care, 14, 95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clarke, J. G., Hebert, M. R., Rosengard, C., Rose, J. S., DaSilva, K. M., & Stein, M. D. (2006). Reproductive health care and family planning needs among incarcerated women. American Journal of Public Health, 96(5), 834–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Watson, R., Stimpson, A., & Hostick, T. (2004). Prison health care: a review of the literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41(2), 119–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Malloch, M. S. (2000). Caring for drug users? The experiences of women prisoners. The Howard Journal, 39, 354–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. World Health Organization. (2007). Health in prisons. Copenhagen.

  11. Enos, S. (2001). Mothering from the inside. Parenting in a women’s prison. New York: University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cowen, E. L. (1991). In pursuit of wellness. American Psychologist, 46(4), 404–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Argyle, M. (1987). The psychology of happiness. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reis, H. T., et al. (2000). Daily well-being: the role of autonomy, competence and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 419–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Uchino, B. N., et al. (1999). Social support, physiological processes and health. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 145–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Brunstein, J. C. (1993). Personal goals and subjective well-being: a longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1061–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Holmes, T., & Rahe, R. (1967). The social readjustment rating scale. Journal of Psichosomatic Search, 11, 213–218.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pearlin, L. (1989). The sociological study of stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 30, 241–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Perlman, D., & Russell, D. (2004). Loneliness and health: mental and physical. In N. Anderson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of health and behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 585–589). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Weiss, R. S. (1985). The experience of emotional and social isolation Cambridge (5th ed.). MIT Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  22. DiTommaso, E., & Spinner, B. (1997). Social an emotional loneliness: a re-examination of Weiss’ typology of loneliness. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 417–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Desmond, A. M. (1991). The relationship between loneliness and social interaction in women prisoners. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 29(3), 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Brown, S., & Day, A. (2008). The role of loneliness in prison suicide prevention and management. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 47(4), 433–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Carcedo, R., López, F., Orgaz, M. B., Toth, K., & Fernández-Rouco, N. (2008). Men and women in the same prison: interpersonal needs and psychological health of prison inmates. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 52(6), 641–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Carcedo, R. J., Perlman, D., López, F., & Orgaz, M. B. (2012). Heterosexual romantic relationships, interpersonal needs, and quality of life in prison. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 187–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Carcedo, R. J., Perlman, D., Orgaz, M. B., López, F., Fernández-Rouco, N., & Faldowski, R. (2011). Heterosexual romantic relationships inside of prison: partner status as predictor of loneliness, sexual satisfaction, and quality of life. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55(6), 898–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lopez, F. (1997). Afecto y sexualidad. In Gomez-Zapiain (Ed.), Avances en Sexologia. Bilbao: Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del Pais Vasco.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Toch, H. (1977). Living in prison: the ecology of survival. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums. Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York: Anchor Books, Doubleday & Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Whitehead, J., Lindquist, C., & Klofas, J. (1987). Correctional officer professional orientation. A replication of the Klofas-Toch measure. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 14, 468–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fuller, J. (1985). Treatment environments in secure psychiatric units: a case study. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 29, 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zani, B., & Cicognani, E. (2000). Psicologia della salute. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zamble, E., & Porporino, F. J. (1988). Coping, behaviour and adaptation in prisons. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Biggam, F. H., & Power, K. G. (1997). Social support and psychological distress in a group of incarcerated young offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 41(3), 213–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Giallombardo, R. (1966). Social roles in a prison for women. Social Problems, 13, 268–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lindquist, C. H., & Lindquist, C. A. (1997). Gender differences in distress: mental health consequences of environmental stress among jail inmates. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 15(4), 503–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fogel, C., & Martin, S. (1992). The mental health of incarcerated women. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 14(1), 30–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Fogel, C. (1993). Pregnant inmates: risk factors and pregnancy outcomes. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 22, 33–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lindquist, C. H. (2000). Social integration and mental well-being among jail inmates. Sociological Forum, 15(3), 431–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Schmid, T. J., & Jones, R. S. (1993). Ambivalent actions. Prison adaptation strategies of first-time, short-term inmates. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 21(4), 439–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ferraro, K. J., & Moe, A. M. (2003). Mothering, crime and incarceration. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 32(1), 9–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Tarozzi, M. (2008). Cos’è la grounded theory. Roma: Carocci.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Mallinson, S., Popay, J., & Williams, G. (2013). Qualitative methods. In C. Guest, W. Ricciardi, I. Kawachi, & I. Lang (Eds.), Oxford handbook of public health practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Carcedo, R. J., Perlman, D., López, F., Orgaz, M. B., & Fernández-Rouco, N. (2015). The relationship between sexual satisfaction and the psychological health of prison inmates: the moderating effects of sexual abstinence and gender. The Prison Journal, 95(1), 43–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Lord, E. A. (2008). The challenges of mentally III female offenders in prison. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 928–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Dodge, M., & Pogrebin, M. R. (2001). Collateral costs of imprisonment for women: complications of reintegration. The Prison Journal, 81(1), 42–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Bloom, B., Owen, B., & Covington, S. (2006). Gender responsive strategies: theory, policy, guiding principles and practices. In R. Immarigeon (Ed.), Women and girls in the criminal justice system: policy issues and practice strategies. Kingston: Civic Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Zaitzow, B. H. (2004). Pastel fascism: reflections of social control techniques used with women in prison. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 32(3- 4), 33–48.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Celinska, K., & Siegel, J. A. (2010). Mothers in trouble: coping with actual or pending separation from children due to incarceration. The Prison Journal, 90(4), 447–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Cassino and Lazio Meridionale, Cassino, Italy

    Maurizio Esposito

Authors
  1. Maurizio Esposito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maurizio Esposito.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Esposito, M. Women in prison: unhealthy lives and denied well-being between loneliness and seclusion. Crime Law Soc Change 63, 137–158 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-015-9561-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-015-9561-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation