Crime, Law and Social Change

, Volume 61, Issue 2, pp 205–214 | Cite as

When farmworkers and advocates see trafficking but law enforcement does not: challenges in identifying labor trafficking in North Carolina

  • Kelle Barrick
  • Pamela K. Lattimore
  • Wayne J. Pitts
  • Sheldon X. Zhang
Article

Abstract

This article reports on the perceptions and experiences with labor trafficking of farmworkers, stakeholders, and law enforcement representatives in North Carolina. We found a sizeable number of farmworkers who had experienced labor trafficking violations, albeit with a convenience sample; and community agencies reported stories of labor trafficking victimization. However, most of the state and local law enforcement agencies that we attempted to contact simply ignored our requests for information about labor trafficking or reported no evidence of such victimization. Notwithstanding the sample limitations, we found a general lack of awareness of agricultural labor trafficking problems among law enforcement officials in our surveyed jurisdictions. We question whether our current law enforcement system will ever be in a position to effectively enforce the anti-labor-trafficking law; and suggest an alternative specialized mechanism be established.

Notes

Acknowledgments

RTI International is an independent organization dedicated to conducting innovative, multidisciplinary research that improves the human condition.

This project was sponsored by Grant Number 2009-IJ-CX-0047, awarded by the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Points of view are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the U.S. Department of Justice.

References

  1. 1.
    Belser, P., de Cock, M., & Mehran, F. (2005). An ILO minimum estimate of forced labor in the world. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organization. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/.
  2. 2.
    International Labour Office (ILO). (2005). A global alliance against forced labour: Global report under the follow-up to the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2009). Global report on trafficking in persons. New York: Author.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Farrell, A., McDevitt, J., & Fahy, S. (2008). Understanding and improving law enforcement responses to human trafficking. Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bales, K., & Lize, S. (2005). Trafficking in persons in the U.S. Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clawson, H. J., & Dutch, N. (2008). Identifying victims of human trafficking: Inherent challenges and promising strategies from the field. Research brief submitted to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wilson, J. M., & Dalton, E. (2008). Human trafficking in the heartland: variation in law enforcement awareness and response. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 24, 296–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wilson, D. G., Walsh, W. F., & Kleuber, S. (2006). Trafficking in human beings: training and services among US law enforcement agencies. Police Practice and Research, 7, 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Farrell, A., McDevitt, J., Pfeffer, R. Fahy, S., Owens, C., Dank, M., & Adams, W. (2012). Identifying challenges to improve the investigation and prosecution of state and local human trafficking cases. Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Newton, P., Mulcahy, T., & Martin, S. (2008). Finding victims of human trafficking. Bethesda: National Opinion Research Center.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2006). Trafficking in persons: Global patterns. New York: Author.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Laczko, F., & Goździak, E. (2005). Data and research on human trafficking: A global survey. Geneva: International Organization for Migration.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Human Smuggling and Trafficking Center. (2006). Fact sheet: Distinctions between human smuggling and human trafficking. Washington, DC: U.S. State Department.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Massey, D., & Sanchez, M. R. (2012). Brokered boundaries: Creating immigration identity in anti-immigrant times. New York: Russell Safe Foundation.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cwikel, J., & Hoban, E. (2005). Contentious issues in research on trafficked women working in the sex industry: study design, ethics, and methodology. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 306–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bergeron, G. (1999). Rapid appraisal methods for the assessment, design, and evaluation of food security programs. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Crawford, I. M. (1997). Marketing research and information systems. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang, S. X. (2012). Looking for a hidden population: Trafficking of migrant laborers in San Diego County. Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    North Carolina Department of Labor (2013). Occupational safety and health division. Available at http://www.nclabor.com/osha/osh.htm.
  20. 20.
    Barrick, K., Lattimore, P.K., Pitts, W.P. & Zhang, S.X. (2013). Indicators of labor trafficking among North Carolina Migrant Farmworkers. Prepared for the National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brennan, D. (2010). Thoughts on finding and assisting individuals in forced labor in the USA. Sexualities, 13, 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169–217.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kelle Barrick
    • 1
  • Pamela K. Lattimore
    • 1
  • Wayne J. Pitts
    • 1
  • Sheldon X. Zhang
    • 2
  1. 1.RTI InternationalNorth CarolinaUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologySan Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations