Throwing the rascals out? The electoral effects of corruption allegations and corruption scandals in Europe 1981–2011
- 716 Downloads
Corrupt politicians have to a surprisingly great extent been found to go unpunished by the electorate. These findings are, however, drawn from case studies on a limited number of countries. This study, on the contrary, is based on a unique dataset from 215 parliamentary election campaigns in 32 European countries between 1981 and 2011, from which the electoral effects of corruption allegations and corruption scandals are analyzed. Information about the extent to which corruption allegations and scandals have occurred is gathered from election reports in several political science journals, and the electoral effects are measured in terms of the electoral performances—the difference in the share of votes between two elections—of all parties in government, as well as the main incumbent party, and the extent to which the governments survive the election. The control variables are GDP growth and unemployment rate the year preceding the election, the effective number of parliamentary and electoral parties, and the level of corruption. The results show that both corruption allegation and corruption scandals are significantly correlated with governmental performances on a bivariate basis; however, not with governmental change. When controlling for other factors, only corruption allegation has an independent effect on government performances. The study thus concludes—in line with previous research—that voters actually punish corrupt politicians, but to a quite limited extent.
KeywordsElectoral Effect Corruption Perception Index Political Corruption Incumbent Party Election Period
- 3.Barberá, P. et al. (2012). The electoral consequences of political scandals in Spain. Paper presented at the XXII World Congress of Political Science, July 2012.Google Scholar
- 5.Della Porta, D., & Mény, Y. (1997). Democracy and corruption in Europe. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
- 6.Dimock, M. A., & Jacobson, G. C. (1995). Checks and choices: the house bank scandal’s impact on voters in 1992. Journal of Politics, 57, 4.Google Scholar
- 7.Eggers, A., & Fisher, A. C. (2011). Electoral accountability and the UK parliamentary expenses scandal: Did Voters Punish Corrupt MPs? Working Paper. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1931868
- 8.Electoral Studies, volumes 2–32Google Scholar
- 9.EPERN Election Briefing. http://www.sussex.ac.uk/sei/research/europeanpartieselectionsreferendumsnetwork/epernelectionbriefings.
- 11.European Journal of Political Research, volumes 22–51.Google Scholar
- 12.Freedom House. www.freedomhouse.org.
- 13.Heidenheimer, A. J., & Johnston, M. (Eds.). (2009). Political corruption. Concepts and contexts (3rd ed.). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
- 16.Inter-Parliamentary Union. http://www.ipu.org/parline-e/parlinesearch.asp.
- 17.Jiménez, F., & Caínzos, M. (2006). How far and why do corruption scandals cost votes? In J. Garrand & J. L. Newell (Eds.), Scandals in the past and contemporary politics. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
- 18.Klasnja, M. et al. (2012). Pocketbook vs. Sociotropic Corruption Voting. Paper presented at the QoG lunch seminar in Gothenburg May 11, 2012.Google Scholar
- 24.Peters, J. G., & Welch, S. (1980). The effects of charges of corruption on voting behavior in congressional elections. American Political Science Review, 74, 3.Google Scholar
- 25.Reed, S. A. (1999). Punishing corruption: The response of the Japanese electorate to scandals. In O. Feldman (Ed.), Political psychology in Japan: Behind the nails which sometimes stick out (and Get Hammered Down). Commack: Nova Science.Google Scholar
- 26.Special Eurobarometer. (2009). 324 attitudes of Europeans towards corruption. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_325_en.pdf.
- 27.Special Eurobarometer. (2012). 374 corruption. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_374_en.pdf.
- 28.Transparency International. www.tranparency.org.
- 30.West European Politics, volumes 4–36.Google Scholar
- 31.Woldendorp, J., et al. (1998). Party government in 20 democracies: an update (1990–1995). European Journal of Political Research, 33, 125–164.Google Scholar