Crime, Law and Social Change

, Volume 57, Issue 5, pp 493–519 | Cite as

Instability, informal control, and criminogenic situations: community effects of returning prisoners

  • Kevin M. Drakulich
  • Robert D. Crutchfield
  • Ross L. Matsueda
  • Kristin Rose


Incarceration, whose putative goal is the reduction of crime, may at higher concentrations actually increase crime by overwhelming neighborhoods with limited resources. The present research poses and provides initial support for an explanation of this paradoxical consequence of a crime control strategy. Specifically, we draw on two different lines of theoretical work to suggest that large numbers of returning prisoners may negatively impact a community’s economic and residential stability, limiting a community’s capacity for informal social control and resulting in labor market conditions conducive to criminal behavior. This study combines data on local social organization processes from a large survey of Seattle residents with contextual, crime, and incarceration data from the US Census, Seattle Police Department, and Washington State Department of Corrections. The results suggest that high concentrations of returning prisoners are associated with a reduced capacity for collective efficacy; the fostering of social situations conducive to criminal behavior; and higher levels of violent crime. The impact of incarceration on these neighborhood processes, however, appears to be largely indirect through the turmoil that concentrations of incarceration create in a neighborhood’s labor and housing markets. We conclude with a call for greater scrutiny of the goals and actual outcomes of incarceration policy.


  1. 1.
    Austin, J. (2001). Prisoner reentry: current trends, practices, and issues. Crime & Delinquency, 47, 314–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beck, A. J. (2000). Prisoners in 1999. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beckett, K., & Western, B. (2001). Governing social marginality: welfare, incarceration, and the transformation of state policy. Punishment and Society, 3, 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beckett, K. (1997). Making crime pay: law and order in contemporary American politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bluestone, B. (1970). The tripartite economy: labor markets and the working poor. Poverty and Human Resources, 5, 15–35.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Braman, D. (2004). Doing time on the outside: incarceration and family life in urban America. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brooks-Gunn, J., Duncan, G. J., Klebanov, P. K., & Naomi Sealand, N. (1993). Do neighborhoods influence child and adolescent development? The American Journal of Sociology, 99, 353–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bursik, R. J., Jr., & Grasmick, H. G. (1993). Neighborhoods and crime: the dimensions of effective community control. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Christie, N. (1993). Crime control as industry: toward gulags, western style? New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Clear, T. R. (1996). Backfire: when incarceration causes crime. The unintended consequences of incarceration. New York: Vera Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Clear, T. R. (2003). The problem with ‘addition by subtraction’: the prison-crime relationship in low income communities. In M. Mauer & M. Chesney-Lind (Eds.), Invisible punishment: the collateral consequences of mass imprisonment (pp. 181–194). New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Clear, T. R. (2007). Imprisoning communities: how mass incarceration makes disadvantaged neighborhoods worse. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Clear, T. R., & Rose, D. R. (2003). Individual sentencing practices and aggregate social problems. In D. F. Hawkins, S. L. Myers, & R. N. Stone (Eds.), Crime, control and social justice: the delicate balance (pp. 27–52). Westport: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Clear, T. R., Rose, D. R., & Ryder, J. A. (2001). Incarceration and community: the problem of removing and returning offenders. Crime & Delinquency, 47, 335–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clear, T. R., Rose, D. R., Waring, E., & Scully, K. (2003). Coercive mobility and crime: a preliminary examination of concentrated incarceration and social disorganization. Justice Quarterly, 20, 33–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cohen, J. (1983). Incapacitation as a strategy for crime control: possibilities and pitfalls. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: a review of research (Vol. 5, pp. 1–84). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activities approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Crutchfield, R. D. (1989). Labor stratification and violent crime. Social Forces, 68, 489–512.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Crutchfield, R. D., Glusker, A., & Bridges, G. S. (1999). A tale of three cities: labor markets and homicide. Sociological Focus, 32, 65–83.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Crutchfield, R. D., Matsueda, R. L., & Drakulich, K. (2006). Race, labor markets, and neighborhood violence. In R. D. Peterson, L. J. Krivo, & J. Hagan (Eds.), The many colors of crime: inequalities of race, ethnicity, and crime in America (pp. 199–220). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fagan, J., West, V., & Holland, J. (2003). Reciprocal effects of crime and incarceration in New York City neighborhoods. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 30, 1551–1601.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gilliard, D. K. (1993). Prisoners in 1992. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gottfredson, M. R., & Hindelang, M. J. (1977). A consideration of telescoping and memory decay biases in victimization surveys. Journal of Criminal Justice, 5, 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hagan, J., & Coleman, J. P. (2001). Returning captives of the American war on drugs: issues of community and family reentry. Crime & Delinquency, 47, 352–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Harris, A., Evans, H., & Beckett, K. (2010). Drawing blood from stones: legal debt and social inequality in the contemporary United States. The American Journal of Sociology, 155, 1753–1799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hipp, J. R., & Yates, D. K. (2009). Do returning parolees affect neighborhood crime? A case study of Sacramento. Criminology, 47, 619–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Huebner, B. M. (2005). The effect of incarceration on marriage and work over the life course. Justice Quarterly, 22, 281–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ingram, J. R. (2007). The effect of neighborhood characteristics on traffic citation practices of the police. Police Quarterly, 10, 371–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kasarda, J. D., & Janowitz, M. (1974). Community attachment in mass society. American Sociological Review, 39, 328–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kornhauser, R. R. (1978). Social sources of delinquency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Levine, J. P. (1976). The potential for crime overreporting in criminal victimization surveys. Criminology, 14, 307–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lynch, J. P., & Sabol, W. J. (2000). Prison use and social control. In J. Horney, R. Peterson, D. MacKenzie, J. Martin, & D. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Criminal justice 2000 (Vol. 3). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lynch, J. P., & Sabol, W. J. (2001). Prisoner reentry in perspective. Urban institute justice policy center crime policy report. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lynch, J. P., & Sabol, W. J. (2004). Assessing the effects of mass incarceration on informal social control in communities. Criminology & Public Policy, 3, 267–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lynch, J. P., & Sabol, W. J. (2004). Effects of incarceration on informal social control in communities. In M. Pattillo, D. Weiman, & B. Western (Eds.), Imprisoning America: the social effects of mass incarceration (pp. 135–164). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lynch, J. P., Sabol, W. J., Planty, M., & Shelley, M. (2001). Crime, coercion, and community: the effects of arrest and incarceration policies on informal social control in neighborhoods. Report to the national institute of justice. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Justice Policy Center.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Massey, D. S. (1996). The age of extremes: concentrated affluence and poverty in the twenty-first century. Demography, 33, 395–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid: segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Matsueda, R. L., Crutchfield, R. D., Guest, A. M., & Kubrin, C. E. (2003). Seattle neighborhoods and crime survey [Computer File].Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Merton, R. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3, 672–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Miethe, T. D. (1991). Testing theories of criminality and victimization in Seattle, 1960–1990 [Computer File]. 2nd ICPSR version. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute [producer], 1991. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1998.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Morenoff, J. D., Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2001). Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology, 39, 517–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mumola, C. J., & Beck, A. J. (1997). Prisoners in 1996. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Nagin, D. S. (1998). Criminal deterrence research at the outset of the twenty-first century. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 23, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Osgood, D. W. (2000). Poisson-based regression analysis of aggregate crime rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16, 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Pager, D., & Quillian, L. (2005). Walking the talk? What employers say versus what they do. American Sociological Review, 70, 355–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Pager, D., Bonikowski, B., & Western, B. (2009). Discrimination in a low wage labor market: a field experiment. American Sociological Review, 74, 777–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Pager, D. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. The American Journal of Sociology, 108, 937–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Pager, D. (2007). Marked: race, crime, and finding work in an era of mass incarceration. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Petersilia, J. (1999). Parole and prisoner reentry in the United States. Crime & Justice, 26, 479–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home: parole and prisoner reentry. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Peterson, R. D., & Krivo, L. J. (2010). Divergent social worlds: neighborhood crime and the racial-spatial divide. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Petrocelli, M., Piquero, A., & Smith, M. (2003). Conflict theory and racial profiling: an empirical analysis of police traffic stop data. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Pettit, B., & Western, B. (2004). Mass imprisonment and the life course: race and class inequality in U.S. incarceration. American Sociological Review, 69, 151–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Piore, M. J. (1970). The dual labor market: theory and implications. In S. H. Beer & R. E. Barringer (Eds.), The state and the poor (pp. 55–59). Cambridge: Winthrop.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Piquero, A. R., West, V., Fagan, J., & Holland, J. (2006). Neighborhood, race, and the economic consequences of incarceration in New York City, 1985–1996. In R. D. Peterson, L. J. Krivo, & J. Hagan (Eds.), The many colors of crime: inequalities of race, ethnicity, and crime in America (pp. 256–273). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Provine, D. M. (2007). Unequal under law: race in the war on drugs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Quillian, L., & Pager, D. (2001). Black neighbors, higher crime? The role of racial stereotypes in evaluations of neighborhood crime. The American Journal of Sociology, 107, 717–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Renaur, B. C., Cunningham, W. C., Feyerherm, B., O’Connor, T., & Bellatty, P. (2006). Tipping the scales of justice: the effect of overincarceration on neighborhood violence. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 17, 362–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Richards, S. C., & Jones, R. S. (2004). Beating the perpetual incarceration machine: overcoming structural impediments to re-entry. In S. Maruna & R. Immarigeon (Eds.), After crime and punishment: pathways to offender reintegration (pp. 201–232). London: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Rose, D., & Clear, T. R. (2004). Incarceration, reentry and social capital: social networks in the balance. In J. Travis & M. Waul (Eds.), Prisoners once removed: the impact of incarceration and reentry on children, families and communities (pp. 313–343). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Rose, D. R., & Clear, T. R. (1998). Incarceration, social capital, and crime: implications for social disorganization theory. Criminology, 36, 441–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Rosich, K. J. (2007). Race, ethnicity, and the criminal justice system. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Sabol, W. J., & Lynch, J. P. (2003). Assessing the longer-run consequences of incarceration: effects on families and employment. In D. F. Hawkins, S. L. Myers Jr., & R. N. Stone (Eds.), Crime control and social justice: the delicate balance. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Sabol, W. J., West, H. C., & Cooper, M. (2010). Prisoners in 2008. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Sampson, R. J. (1987). Urban black violence: the effect of male joblessness and family disruption. The American Journal of Sociology, 93, 348–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Sampson, R. J., & Wilson, W. J. (1995). Race, crime and urban inequality. In J. Hagan & R. Peterson (Eds.), Crime and inequality. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2004). Seeing disorder: neighborhood stigma and the social construction of “broken windows.”. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67, 319–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Earls, F. (1999). Beyond social capital: spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. American Sociological Review, 64, 633–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Seiter, R. P., & Kadela, K. R. (2003). Prisoner reentry: what works, what does not, and what is promising. Crime & Delinquency, 49, 360–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Simon, J. (2000). Miami: governing the city through crime. In M. Polese & R. Stren (Eds.), The social sustainability of cities: diversity and the management of change. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Spelman, W. (2000). What recent studies do (and don’t) tell us about imprisonment and crime. Crime and justice: A review of research, 27, 419–494.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Sutherland, E. H. (1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Travis, J., Solomon, A. L., & Waul, M. (2001). From prison to home: the dimensions and consequences of prisoner reentry. Urban institute justice policy center crime policy report. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Visher, C. A., & Travis, J. (2003). Transitions from prison to community: understanding individual pathways. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 89–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Wacquant, L. (2003). America’s new ‘peculiar institution:’ on the prison as surrogate ghetto. In T. G. Blomberg & S. Cohen (Eds.), Punishment and social control (2dth ed., pp. 471–482). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Watts, H., & Nightingale, D. S. (1996). Adding it up: the economic impact of incarceration on individuals, families, and communities. The unintended consequences of incarceration. New York: Vera Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Western, B. (2002). The impact of incarceration on wage mobility and inequality. American Sociological Review, 67, 526–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Western, B. (2006). Punishment and inequality in America. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: the inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin M. Drakulich
    • 1
  • Robert D. Crutchfield
    • 2
  • Ross L. Matsueda
    • 2
  • Kristin Rose
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Criminology and Criminal JusticeNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations