Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Toward a phenomenology of terrorism: implications for research and policy

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The central theme of this paper is that the phenomenology of perception can contribute to conceptualizing terrorism, in terms of both a research orientation and policy applications. This means that counter-terrorism needs to be grounded in a holistic perspective that has meaning from the point of view of those engaged in terrorism. A critique of the “war on terror” counter-terrorism practices is followed by a discussion of phenomenology and its implications for a holistic perception of counter-terrorism. Four cases are presented that show how a phenomenological approach can facilitate counter-terrorism study and policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/2006/82736.htm

  2. http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/2005/64337.htm

  3. http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/2005/64337.htm

  4. http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/2005/64337.htm

  5. http://www.state.gov/s/ct/c14151.htm

  6. http://www.iiipublishing.com/elf.htm accessed Dec. 24, 2009.

  7. http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2003/09/23/Environment-activist-violence-increasing/UPI-33721064366773/ accessed Dec. 24, 2009.

  8. The term ‘crusaders’ is used link a historic military campaign to a modern day enemy. Images of colonial occupation and the killing of Muslims in pre and post colonization from Europe to include the French in Algeria and the British in Egypt and the attempts to intervene with religious, cultural and political dimensions of the areas in which they occupied. It was not by chance that President Bush used the term ‘crusades’ to describe America’s global war on terrorism.

  9. General McChrystal, the former U.S. Forces Commander in Afghanistan, understood the value of accessing the ‘hearts’ of the Afghan population and began his command with a listening tour of the Afghan population in 2009. Special Forces Major Gant’s Strategy of Winning the War One Tribe at a Time (2009), a plan devoted to winning the hearts of tribal leaders, was crafted from his experiences in Afghanistan of what is projected to work.

References

  1. Aaron, D. (2008) In the Their Own Words: Voices of Jihad—Compilation and Commentary. RAND Corporation.

  2. Abby, E. (1968). Desert solitaire. New York: Random House, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Abby, E. (1975). The monkey wrench gang. New York: Harper-Collins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aboul-Enein, Y. (2004). Ayman Al-Zawahiri: The ideologue of modern Islamic militancy

  5. al-Zawahiri, A. (2006). “Realities of the Conflict Between Islam and Unbelief.” Laura Mansfield. http://www.lauramansfield.com/j/zawahiri_122006.asp

  6. Bar-On, M. (2006). Conflicting narratives or narratives of conflict? In R. Rotberg (Ed.), Israeli and Palestinian narratives of conflict (pp. 142–173). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. BBC, (2003). “Al-Qaida Statement: Full Text.” May 21. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3047903.stm

  8. Carruthers, S. (1995). Winning hearts and minds: British governments, the media and colonial counter-insurgency, 1944–1960. Leicester: Leicester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. CBS, (2003). Sept 23.

  10. Cordes, B. (1987) When terrorists do the talking: reflections on terrorist literature/Santa Monica, CA (P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica 90406–2138) : Rand Corp.

  11. Crank, J. & Gregor, P. (2005). Counter-terrorism after 9/11: Justice, Security and Ethics Reconsidered. Matthew Bender & Company.

  12. Davis, W. (1995). Dealing with criminal religions: The case of supreme truth. Christian Century, 19–26, 710.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dawdy, P. (2003). “Violence and Protest.” Seattle Weekly, Apr 9. www.seattleweekly.com/features/0315/news-dawdy.php.

  14. Dorronsoro, G. (2009). The Taliban’s winning strategy in Afghanistan. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Downes, D. M., & Rock, P. E. (2007). Understanding deviance: A guide to the sociology of crime and rule-breaking (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Earth Liberation Front, (1997). Communiqué. http://mcn.org/e/iii/elf.htm.

  17. Ellul, J. (1973). Propaganda: The formation of Men's attitudes. Trans. Konrad Kellen & Jean Lerner. New York: Knopf, 1965. New York: Random House.

  18. Ferracuti, F. (1982). A sociopsychiatric interpretation of terrorism. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 463, 129–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Filkins, D. (2009). Stanley McChrystal’s long war. New York Times Magazine, October 14. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/18/magazine/18Afghanistan-t.html

  20. Gadamer, H. G. (1981). Reason in the age of science. Trans. by Frederick Lawrence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  21. Gerges, F. A. (2005). The far enemy: Why Jihad went Global. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Hoffman, B. (2006). Inside terrorism (Rev. and expanded ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Horgan, J. (2005). The psychology of terrorism. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Humanitarians for Animal Rights Education (1999) ELF statement.

  25. Hummel, R. P. (2002). Back to the future: The twenty-first century and the loss of sensibility. In J. S. Jun (Ed.), Rethinking administrative theory in the twenty-first century (pp. 187–198). Westport: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hummel, R. P. (2004). Judgment. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Society for Public Administration, Portland, OR.

  27. Hummel, R. P. (2006). Arendt, Kant, and the beauty of politics: A phenomenological view. Paper presented at conference on setting up a society of political phenomenology, the Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology, Memphis, TN.

  28. Hummel, R. P., & Zingale, N. (2008). Disturbance, coping, and innovation: Phenomenology of terror. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 30(2), 207–224.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Husserl, E. (1980). Phenomenology and the foundations of the sciences. The Hague; Boston Hingham, MA: M. Nijhoff Publishers;distributors for the U.S., and Canada Kluwer Boston.

  30. Husserl, E., & Rojcewicz, R. (1997). Thing and space: lectures of 1907. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Husserl, E., & Welton, D. (1999). The essential Husserl: basic writings in transcendental phenomenology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. International Crisis Group (ICG) (2008). Taliban propaganda: Winning the war of words?, 24 July, Asia Report No. 158.

  33. Jasper, J.M. (1998). Emotions of Protest: Affective and Reactive Emotions in and around Social Movements. Sociological Forum, 13(3), (September).

  34. Juergensmeyer, M. (2003). Terror in the mind of God. Los Angeles California: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kilcullen. (2009). The accidental guerilla: Fighting small wars in the midst of a big one. USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kellen, K. (1979). Terrorists—what are they like? How some terrorists describe their world and actions (A Rand Note). Santa Monica: The Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kepel, G. (2004). The war for Muslim minds. Islam and the West Cambridge: The Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kepel, G., & Milelli, J. P. (2008). Al Qaeda in its own words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Klandermans, B. (1984). Mobilization and Participation: Social-Psychological Expansions of Resource Mobilzation Theory, American Sociological Review, 49, 583–600.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lee, A. M. (1945). The analysis of propaganda: A clinical summary. The American Journal of Sociology, 51(2), 126–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Liddick, D. (2006). Eco-terrorism: Radical environmental and animal liberation movements. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lifton, R. J. (1999). Destroying the world to save it: Aum Shinrikyo, apocalyptic violence, and the new global terrorism (1st ed.). New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945) Phenomenology of perception. Translated by Colin Smith (New York: Humanities Press, 1963).

  44. Metraux, D. A. (1995). Religious terrorism in Japan: The fatal appeal of Aum Shinrikyo. Asian Survey, 35(12), 1140–1154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Metraux, D. A. (2000). Aum Shinrikyo's impact on Japanese society. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Michel, L., & Herbeck, D. (2001). American terrorist: Timothy McVeigh & the Oklahoma City bombing (1st ed.). New York: Regan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Moghaddam, F. (2006). From the terrorists’ point of view: What they experience and why they come to destroy. West Port Connecticut: Praeger Security International.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Moran, D. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Morf, G. (1970). Terror in Quebec: Case studies of the FLQ. Vancouver: Clark, Irwin and Company Limited/Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Moustakas, C. E. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Muntassir, A.-Z. (2004). The road to Al Qaeda: The story of bin laden’s right hand man. Ann Arbor: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Nacos, B. L. (2007). Mass-mediated terrorism. The central role of the media in terrorism and counterterrorism. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  53. No Compromise (2000). “Elf Spokesperson Targeted by Oregon Grand Jury.” www.nocompromise.org/issues/16craig.html.

  54. Peterson, S. (2009). U.S. Intelligence Support to Decision Making. Weatherhead Center for International Affairs. Harvard University. Unpublished Research Paper. July. 35 pages.

  55. Raphaeli, N. (2002). Ayman Muhammad Rabi’ Al-Zawahiri: The making of an arch-terrorist. Terrorism and Political Violence, 14(4), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Rapoport, D. (2001). The International world as some terrorists have seen it: A look at a century of Memoirs. In Inside Terrorist Organizations, edited by David C. Rapoport. 2001 Portland.

  57. Robinson, L. (2008). Tell me how this ends: General David Petraeus and the search for a way out of Iraq. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Reader, I. (2000). Religious violence in contemporary Japan: The case of Aum Shinrikyo. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Robbins, T., & Palmer, S. J. (1997). Millennium, messiahs, and mayhem: contemporary apocalyptic movements. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Rubin, A. (2010). ‘Taliban Overhaul Image to Win Allies.’ The New York Times. Jan. 20, 2010. Can be accessed at: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/21/world/asia/21taliban.html.

  61. Schalk, P. (1994). Women fighters of the liberation tigers in Tamil Ilam. The Martial Feminism of Atel Palachinkam. South Asia Research, 14(2), 163–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Schmid, A. P. & Jongman, A. J. (2005). Political terrorism: A new guide to actors, authors, concepts, data bases, theories, and literature. Transaction Publishers, 2nd edition.

  63. Schutz, A., & Walsh, G. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world. [Evanston, Ill.]: Northwestern University Press.

  64. Serrano, R. A. (1998). One of ours: Timothy McVeigh and the Oklahoma City bombing. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Taylor, C. (1994). Interpretation and the Sciences of Man. In M. Martin & L. McIntyre (Eds.), Readings in the philosophy of social science (pp. 181–212). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  67. U.S. Department of State (2001). Patterns of Global Terrorism. http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/2000/2419.htm

  68. Victoroff, J. (2005). The mind of the terrorist. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(1), 3–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Vidal, G. (2002). Perpetual war for perpetual peace: How we got to be so hated. New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press/Nation Books.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Wessinger, C. L. (2000). How the millennium comes violently: From Jonestown to Heaven’s Gate. New York: Seven Bridges.

    Google Scholar 

  71. White House (2001). http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/10/20011011-1.html.

  72. Zingale, N. C. (2004). Self-regulation in environmental policy: Fact or chimera. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Akron.

  73. Zingale, N. C. (2007). From novice to expert: Operationalizing kinds of knowing in an environmental management setting. Public Voices, 10, 47–63.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John P. Crank.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morris, T., Crank, J.P. Toward a phenomenology of terrorism: implications for research and policy. Crime Law Soc Change 56, 219–242 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-011-9310-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-011-9310-9

Keywords

Navigation