Crime, Law and Social Change

, Volume 55, Issue 5, pp 375–389 | Cite as

RSPCA and the criminology of social control

  • Gordon HughesEmail author
  • Claire Lawson


This paper contributes to a rethinking of animal abuse control and animal welfare protection in criminology, specifically, and in the social sciences more broadly. We do this, first, through a broad mapping of the institutional control complex around animal abuse in contemporary Britain. Second, we focus on the institutional strategies and practices, past and present, of the main agency of animal protection, and the policing thereof, in this society, namely the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA). In looking back to this charity’s growth since the first decades of the nineteenth century at the time of the birth of modern industrial capitalism and also to its current rationale and practices as a late-modern, corporate organisation, we explore the seeming paradox of a private body taking a lead on the regulation and prosecution of illegalities associated with animal-human relationships. Finally, the ideology and strategy of the RSPCA are explored in the context of the often visceral and culturally influential ‘morality war’ associated with proponents, respectively, of animal rights (‘abolition’) and ‘anthropic’ welfare proponents (‘regulation’ and ‘protection’).


Animal Welfare Animal Protection Mobilisation Strategy Green Criminology Animal Abuse 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Beirne, P. (1995). The use and abuse of animals in criminology: a brief history and current review. Social Justice, 22(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beirne, P. (2007). Animal rights, animal abuse and green criminology. In P. Beirne & N. South (Eds.), Issues in green criminology: Confronting harms against environments, humanity and other animals. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    White, R. (2008). Crimes against nature: Environmental criminology and ecological justice. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beirne, P., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2006). Criminology (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Roxbury.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beirne, P. (2009). Confronting animal abuse: Law, criminology, and human-animal relationships. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pierpoint, H., & Maher, J. (2010). Animal Abuse. In F. Brookman, M. Maguire, H. Pierpoint, & T. Bennett (Eds.), Handbook on Crime (pp. 480–501). Uffculme: Willan.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    DEFRA. (2010). Memorandum to the environment, food and rural affairs committee: Post-legislative Assessment of AWA 2006. London: DEFRA.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hughes, G., Maher, J., & Lawson, C. (2011). ‘Status dogs’, young people and criminalisation: Towards a preventative strategy. Horsham: RSPCA.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hughes, G. (2007). The politics of crime and community. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Edwards, A., & Hughes, G. (2005). Comparing safety in Europe: a geo-historical approach. Theoretical Criminology, 3, 345–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jones, T., & Newburn, T. (1998). Private security and public policing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jones, T., & Newburn, T. (2002). The transformation of policing?: understanding current trend in policing systems. British Journal of Criminology, 42(1), 129–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Crawford, A., Lister, S., Blackburn, S., & Burnett, J. (2005). Plural policing: The mixed economy of visible patrols in England and Wales. Bristol: Policy.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Button, M. (2002). Private policing. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Beirne, P. (1999). For a non-speciesist criminology: animal abuse as an object of study. Criminology, 37(1), 117–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Garner, R. (2004). Animals, politics and morality (2nd ed.). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Perkin, H. (1969). The origins of modern English society. London: RKP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thomas, R. (1983). Man and the natural world. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Harrison, B. (1973). Animals and the State in nineteenth-century England. English Historical Review, XXXVIII(CCCXLIX), 786–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Francione, G., & Garner, R. (2010). The animal rights debate. New York: University of Columbia Press.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pemberton, N., & Worboys, M. (2007). Mad dogs and Englishmen: Rabies in Britain 1830–2000. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Harrison, B. (1967). Religion and recreation in nineteenth-century England. Past and Present, 36–38, 98–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Radford, M. (2001). Animal welfare law in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sharp, J. (2001). Crime order and historical change. In J. Muncie & McLaughlin (Eds.), The problem of crime (2nd ed., pp. 107–149). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA) (2010). Annual Review 2009. From
  27. 27.
    Edwards, A., & Hughes, G. (forthcoming) Control as socially situated action.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish. London: Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
    Donovan, T., &Wallace, C. (2009). Charity Brand Index. From
  31. 31.
    Robinson, C. (2010). Enforcing animal welfare. Animal Welfare Science, Ethics and Law Veterinary Association, 14(1), 6.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    OIE (World Organisation for Animal Health). (2010). Supporting the implementing of OIE animal welfare standards: The role that civil society plays. Horsham: RSPCA.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    RSPCA (2010b). Prosecutions Department Annual Report 2009. From
  34. 34.
    Lawson, C. (2010) Where is the ‘P’ in RSPCA: A criminological case study of crime prevention within animal cruelty. MSc. Dissertation, Cardiff University.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Scott, C. (2002). Private regulation of the public sector: a neglected facet of contemporary governance. Journal of Law and Society, 29(1), 56–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Brooman, S., & Legge, D. (1997). Law relating to animals. London: Cavendish.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) (2010). The Code for Crown Prosecutors. London: Crown. From
  38. 38.
    Harrop, S. (2000). Challenges and Dilemmas Faced by Conservation and Animal Welfare Charities Who Both Enforce the Law and Press for Changes. In A. Dunn (Ed.), The voluntary sector, the State and the law (pp. 211–226). Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    CPS (2010). Legal Guidance: Offences involving domestic and captive animals. From
  40. 40.
    Yates, R. (2010). Review of G. Francione’s ‘Animals as persons. Sociology, 44(6), 1208–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kaspersson, M. (2008). On treating the symptoms and not the cause. Reflections on the dangerous dogs act. Papers from the British Criminology Conference, 8, 205–225.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hillyard, P., Pantazis, C., Tombs, S., & Gordon, D. (Eds.). (2004). Beyond criminology: Taking harm seriously. London: Fernwood.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    O’Neil, B. (2010). In defence of devil dogs. The Spectator, 6 March, p. 24.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Grabosky, P. N. (1995). Using non-governmental resources to foster regulatory compliance. Governance, 8(4), 527–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Fuller, S. (2006). The new sociological imagination. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cardiff University, Centre for Crime, Law and Justice, School of Social SciencesCardiffUK
  2. 2.RSPCA CymruCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations