Advertisement

Crime, Law and Social Change

, Volume 54, Issue 5, pp 325–337 | Cite as

Vote-buying crime reports in Mexico: magnitude and correlates

  • Carlos Vilalta
Article

Abstract

Vote-buying is a significant problem in developing democracies. If reports of vote-buying crimes are high, results may be challenged by competing candidates in electoral courts, and violent political confrontation may erupt. Also, if not prosecuted, there is danger of vote-buying becoming a common feature of electoral processes. This study assessed the magnitude and correlates of vote-buying crime reports during the 2006 elections in Mexico. It made use of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) survey on the Protection of Federal Social Programs of 2006 (ENAPP). Results showed that 8.8% of the survey respondents nationwide who were not beneficiaries of any federal social program reported to have been offered something in exchange of their vote, that is, a vote-buying crime under the legislation of Mexico. Ordinal logistic regression showed five independent correlates of vote-buying crime reports: Years of schooling, Indian language speaking, municipal marginality, population size, and PRD versus PAN governed municipalities. The paper discusses the reasons and consequences by suggesting other aspects to consider for future research.

Keywords

United Nations Development Program Indian Language Marginality Level Party Campaigner Partido Revolucionario Institucional 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Aparicio, R. (2002). La Magnitud de la Manipulación del Voto en las Elecciones Federales del Año 2000. Perfiles Latinoamericanos, 20, 79–99.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aparicio, J. (2009). Análisis estadístico de la elección presidencial de 2006: ¿fraude o errores aleatorios? Política y Gobierno, special volume on Mexican Elections, 2, 225–243.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brusco, V., Nazareno, M., & Stokes, S. (2004). Vote buying in Argentina. Latin American Research Review, 39(2), 66–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Callahan, W. (2005). The discourse of vote buying and political reform in Thailand. Pacific Affairs, 78(1), 95–113.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cornelius, W. (2004). Mobilized voting in the 2000 elections: The changing efficacy of vote buying and coercion in Mexican electoral politics. In J. I. Dominguez & C. Lawson (Eds.), Capítulo en Mexico’s pivotal democratic elections: Candidates, voters, and the presidential campaign of 2000. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davis, D. (1994) Urban leviathan: Mexico City in the twentieth century. USA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Díaz-Cayeros, A., Estévez, F., & Magaloni, B. (2006). Vote buying, poverty, and democracy: The politics of social programs in Mexico. Available at: http://www.stanford.edu/~albertod/conference/DEMchapter1struggle.pdf.
  8. 8.
    McCann, J., & Domínguez, J. I. (1998). Mexicans react to electoral fraud and political corruption: an assessment of public opinion and voting behavior. Electoral Studies, 17(4), 483–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hall, A. (2006). From Fome Zero to Bolsa Familia: social policies and poverty alleviation under Lula. Journal of Latin American Studies, 38(4), 689–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Horbath, J. (2002). Cambio Electoral, Marginación y Formas de Manipulación en México: Las Elecciones de 1994, 1997 y 2000. Convergencia, 9(27), 185–220.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Horbath, J. (2004). Pobreza y elecciones en Colombia: Algunos hallazgos para reflexionar. Espiral, X, 199–235.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kornblith, M. (2002). The politics of vote buying in Venezuela. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston Marriott Copley Place, Sheraton Boston & Hynes Convention Center, Boston, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lawson, Ch. (2000). Mexico’s unfinished transition: democratization and authoritarian enclaves in Mexico. Mexican Studies, 16(2), 267–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Massolo, A. (1992). Por amor y coraje: mujeres en movimientos urbanos de la ciudad de México. México: El Colegio de Mexico.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pliego, F. (2007). El mito del fraude electoral en México. México: Editorial Pax.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reyna, J. (1971). An empirical analysis of political mobilization: The case of Mexico. Ph.D dissertation: Cornell University.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ugalde, L. C. (2008). Así lo viví: Testimonio de la elección presidencial de 2006. México: Grijalbo-Random House Mondadori.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vilalta, C. (2007) Compra y coacción del voto en México: variaciones estatales y diferencias de opinión entre beneficiarios y no beneficiarios de programas sociales. Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo (PNUD), Mexico.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wilhelm, B. (2003). A compra de votos? uma aproximação empírica. Opinião Pública, 9(1), 148–169.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Economic Research and Education (CIDE)Mexico CityMexico

Personalised recommendations