Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The construction of ‘So What?’ criminology: a realist analysis

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From a realist perspective there is a growing body of criminology that can be classified as ‘So What?’ criminology in that it involves a low level of theorisation, thin, inconsistent or vague concepts and categories, embodies a dubious methodology or has little or no policy relevance. The production of ‘So What?’ criminology is, of course, no accident but the outcome of a number of lines of force that have served to shape the nature of mainstream academic criminology in recent years. The aim of this article is to identify some of these lines of force and to assess their impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amin, A. (1994). Post-Fordism: A reader. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Bauman, Z. (1995). Life in fragments: Essays in postmodern morality. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bhaskar, R. (1979). A realist theory of science. Brighton: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blumstein, A., & Wallman, J. (2000). The crime drop in America. Cambridge University Press.

  5. Braithwaite, J., & Pettit, P. (1990). Not just deserts: A republican theory of criminal justice. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Callinicos, A. (1989). Against postmodernism: A Marxist critique. Oxford: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cann, J. (2006). Cognitive skills programmes: Impact on reducing reconviction among a sample of female prisoners, research findings 276. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cann, J., Falshaw, L., Nugent, F., & Friendship, C. (2005). Understanding what works; accredited cognitive skills programmes for adult men and young offenders. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carlen, P. (2002). Carceral Clawback: the case of women’s imprisonment in Canada. Punishment and Society, 4(1), 115–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Carlen, P., & Worrall, A. (2004). Analysing women’s imprisonment. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chesney-Lind, M. (2006). Patriarchy crime and justice: feminist criminology in an era of backlash. Feminist Criminology, 1(1), 6–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cohen, S. (1985). Visions of social control. Polity.

  13. Cohen, S. (1998). Against criminology. New Brunswick: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cook, T., & Campbell, D. (1979). Quasi-experimentation. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Crawford, A. (2006). Networked governance and the post-regulatory state. Theoretical Criminology, 10(4), 449–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cullen, F., & Gendrau, P. (2001). From nothing works to what works: changing professional ideology in the 21st. century. The Prison Journal, 81(3), 313–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Currie, E. (2007). Against marginality: arguments for a public criminology. Theoretical Criminology, 11(2), 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dilworth, C. (1990). Empiricism vs. realism: high points in the debate during the past 150 years. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 21(3), 431–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ericson, R. (2007). Crime in an insecure world. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ferrell, J. (1999). Cultural criminology. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 395–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ferrell, J. (2007). For a ruthless cultural criticism of everything existing. Crime, Media and Culture, 3(1), 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ferrell, J., Milovanovic, D., & Lyng, S. (2001). Edgework, media practices and the elongation of meaning. Theoretical Criminology, 5(2), 177–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ferrell, J., Hayward, K., & Young, J. (2008). Cultural criminology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fraser, N. (2003). From discipline to flexibilization? Re-reading foucault in the shadow of globalization. Constellations, 10(2), 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Garland, D. (1995). Penal modernism and postmodernism. In T. Blomberg & S. Cohen (Eds.), Punishment and social control. New York: Aldine and Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Garland, D. (2006). Concepts of culture in the sociology of punishment. Theoretical Criminology, 10(4), 419–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gelb, K. (2003). Women in prison—why the rate of incarceration is increasing. Paper presented at the Evaluation on Crime and Justice; Trends and Methods’ Conference. Canberra. March. Australian Institute of Criminology.

  29. Greenberg, G. (2001). Novus ordo saeclorum? A commentary on downes and Beckett and Western. Punishment and Society, 3(1), 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hall, S., & Winlow, S. (2007). Cultural criminology and primitive accumulation: a formal introduction to two strangers who really should become more intimate. Crime, Media and Culture, 3(1), 82–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hillyard, P., Pantazis, C., Tombs, S., & Gordon, D. (eds) Beyond criminology: Taking harm seriously. London: Pluto.

  33. Hope, T. (2004). Pretend it works: evidence and governance in the evaluation of the reducing burglary initiative. Criminal Justice, 4(3), 287–308.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hough, M., Allen, R., & Solomon, E. (2008). Tackling prison overcrowding. Bristol: The Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hutchinson, S. (2006). Countering catastrophic criminology. Punishment and Society, 8(4), 443–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jacobson, M. (2005). Downsizing prisons: How to reduce crime and end mass incarceration. New York University Press.

  37. Karmen, A. (2000). The New York murder mystery. New York University Press.

  38. Kong, R., & AuCoin, K. (2008). Female offenders in Canada. Juristat, 28(1). Catalogue No. 85–002_XIE. Canadian Centre for Justice Studies.

  39. Lea, J. (1998). Criminology and postmodernity. In P. Walton & J. Young (Eds.), The new criminology revisited. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lucken, K. (1998). Contemporary penal trends: modern or postmodern? British Journal of Criminology, 38(1), 106–123.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lyon, D. (1999). Postmodernity. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lyotard, J. (1996). The postmodern condition. Manchester University Press.

  43. MacLennan, G., & Thomas, P. (2003). Cultural studies: Towards a realist intervention. In J. Cruickshank (Ed.), Critical realism: The difference it makes. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Manicas, P. (2006). A realist philosophy of social sciences. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. Mathieson, T. (1974). The politics of abolition. London: Martin Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Matthews, R. (2009). Beyond “So What?” criminology: Rediscovering realism. Theoretical Criminology, 13(3), 341–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Matthews, R. (2009). Doing time: An introduction to the sociology of imprisonment (2nd ed.). London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Matthews, R., & Young, J. (1992). Reflections on realism. In J. Young & R. Matthews (Eds.), Rethinking criminology: The realist debate. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Nola, R., & Irzik, G. (2003). Incredulity towards Lyotard: a critique of a postmodernist account of science and knowledge. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 34, 391–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. O’Brien, M. (2005). What is cultural about cultural criminology? British Journal of Criminology, 45, 599–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Pavlich, G. (1999). Criticism and criminology: in search of legitimacy. Theoretical Criminology, 3(1), 29–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence-based policy: A realist perspective. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realist evaluation. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Pitts, J. (2007). Who cares what works? Youth and Policy, 95. Spring.

  55. Pratt, J., Brown, D., Brown, M., Hallsworth, S., & Morrison, W. (2005). The new punitiveness: Trends, theories, perspectives. Collumpton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Presdee, M. (2000). Cultural criminology and the carnival of crime. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  57. Ray, L., & Sayer, A. (1999). Culture and economy after the cultural turn. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Sabol, W., Conture, P., & Harrison, P. (2007). Prisoners in America. Bureau of Justice Statistics NCJ 219416: US Department of Justice.

  59. Sayer, A. (1992). Methods in social science: A realist approach. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Sayer, A. (1997). Critical realism and the limits to critical social science. Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour, 27(4), 473–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Sayer, A. (2000). Realism and social science. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Sennett, R. (1998). The corrosion of character: The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. London: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Sim, J. (2009). Punishment and prisons: Power and the carceral state. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Simon, J. (1993). Poor discipline: Parole and the social control of the underclass, 1890–1990. The University of Chicago Press.

  65. Simon, J. (2001). Entitlement to cruelty; neo-liberalism and the punitive mentality in the United States. In K. Stenson & R. Sullivan (Eds.), Crime risk and justice. Collumpton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Smart, C. (1990). Feminist approaches to criminology or postmodern woman meets atavistic man. In A. Morris & L. Gelsthope (Eds.), Feminist perspectives in criminology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Tilley, N. (2001). Evaluation and evidence—led crime reduction and policy. In R. Matthews & J. Pitts (Eds.), Crime, disorder and community safety. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Tonry, M. (2001). Penal reform in overcrowded times. Oxford University Press.

  69. Van Swaaningen, R. (1999). Reclaiming critical criminology: social justice and the European tradition. Theoretical Criminology, 3(1), 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Wacquant, L. (2000). The new peculiar institution: on the prison as a surrogate ghetto. Theoretical Criminology, 4(3), 377–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Wacquant, L. (2005). The great penal leap backwards: Incarceration in America from Nixon to Clinton. In J. Pratt et al. (Eds.), The new punitiveness: Trends theories, perspectives. Collumpton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Walters, R. (2003). New modes of governance and the commodification of criminological knowledge. Social and Legal Studies, 12(1), 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Wright Mills, C. (1959). The sociological imagination. Oxford University Press.

  74. Young, J. (1976). Working class criminology. In I. Taylor, P. Walton, & J. Young (Eds.), Critical criminology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Zedner, L. (2002). Dangers of dystopias in penal theory. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 22(2), 341–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. London South Bank University, Southwark, UK

    Roger A. Matthews

Authors
  1. Roger A. Matthews
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger A. Matthews.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matthews, R.A. The construction of ‘So What?’ criminology: a realist analysis. Crime Law Soc Change 54, 125–140 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-010-9249-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-010-9249-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation