Skip to main content

Citizenship status and arrest patterns in the United States: evidence from the arrestee drug abuse monitoring program

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to estimate associations between citizenship status and arrest for crimes among male arrestees. The primary hypothesis was that citizenship status (a rough proxy for immigration) has significant effects on arrest for violent personal crimes, property crimes, and four other selected offenses. Data were derived from the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program for the years 2000 through 2002 inclusive. Our sample comprised male arrestees only. Logistic regression models were fitted to the data to estimate the citizenship status-crime relationship. Results showed no significant association between citizenship status and arrest for violent crimes. Non-citizens were 15% less likely than citizens to be arrested for property crimes; they were also less likely to be arrested for weapons offenses and drug offenses. Non-citizens were much less likely to test positive on NIDA-5 drugs than citizens. Non-citizens were, however, 50% more likely than citizens to be arrested for forgery/counterfeiting. It was concluded that public perceptions about the relationship of citizenship status to criminal behavior may be exaggerated and may not be borne out by empirical evidence. Limitations of the study are pointed out, including the fact that in the ADAM data, naturalized immigrants are lumped together with native born citizens.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Agozino, B. (2000). Theorizing otherness, the war on drugs and incarceration. Theoretical Criminology, 4, 359–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Albertson, B., & Gadarian, S. (2007). Fear in the illegal immigration debate: where do anxious citizens get news? Chicago: Paper presented at the 2007 annual meeting of the Midwestern Political Science Association. April.

  3. Batta, I. D., Mawby, R. I., & McCulloch, J. W. (1981). Crime, social problems and asian immigration: the Bradford experience. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 18, 135–168.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bernburg, J. G., & Thorlindsson, T. (2007). Community structure and adolescent delinquency in Iceland: a contextual analysis. Criminology, 45, 415–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bertrand, E., Blachman, M., Sharpe, K., & Andreas, P. (1996). Drug war politics: The price of denial. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brimelow, P. (1995). Alien nation: Commonsense about America’s immigration disaster. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brown, B., & Benedict, W. R. (2004). Bullets, blades, and being afraid in Hispanic high schools: an exploratory study of the presence of weapons and fear of weapons-associated victimization among high school students in a border town. Crime & Delinquency, 50, 372–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bruinsma, G., & Bernasco, W. (2004). Criminal groups and transnational illegal markets. Crime, Law & Social Change, 41, 79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Busey, S. S. (1969). Immigration: Its evils and consequences. New York: Arno Press and the New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Butcher, K. F., & Piehl, A. H. (1998). Cross-city evidence on the relationship between immigration and crime. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17, 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chang, N. (2002). Silencing dissent: How post-September 11 anti-terrorism measures threaten our civil liberties. New York: Seven Stories.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chan, W. (2005). Crime, deportation and the regulation of immigrants in Canada. Crime, Law & Social Change, 44, 153–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen, S. (1972). Folk devils and moral panics. London: Macgibbon and Kee.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cole, D. (2003). Enemy aliens: Double standards and constitutional freedoms in the war on terrorism. New York: New.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Coutin, S. B. (2005). Contesting criminality: illegal immigration and the spatialization of legality. Theoretical Criminology, 9, 5–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Curry, D. G., & Spergel, I. A. (1988). Gang homicide, delinquency, and community. Criminology, 26, 381–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Damphousse, K. R. (2001). Start spreading the news: understanding the drug problem in the mid-American states with the arrestee drug abuse monitoring program. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 29, 45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  18. De Genova, N. (2007). The production of culprits: from deportability to detainability in the aftermath of homeland security. Citizenship Studies, 11, 421–448.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dunn, T. J. (2001). Border militarization via drug and immigration enforcement: human rights implications. Social Justice, 28, 7–29.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2004). Crime in the United States 2003. Washington: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Glassner, B. (2000). The culture of fear. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Goode, E., & Ben-Yehuda, N. (1994). Moral panics: The social construction of deviance. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hagan, J., & Palloni, A. (1998). Immigration and crime in the United States. In J. P. Smith & B. Edmonston (Eds.), The immigration debate: Studies on the economic, demographic, and fiscal effects of immigration (pp. 367–387). Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hourwich, I. A. (1912). Immigration and crime. American Journal of Sociology, 17, 478–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Heyman, J. (1999). United States surveillance over Mexican lives at the border: snapshots of an emerging regime. Human Organization, 58, 430–438.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. (2002). Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program, Technical Documentation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jones, M. A. (1992). American immigration (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kane, R., & Yacoubian, G. (1999). Patterns of drug escalation among Philadelphia arrestees: an assessment of the gateway theory. Journal of Drug Issues, 29, 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kennedy, L. W., & Baron, S. W. (1993). Routine activities and a subculture of violence: a study of violence on the street. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 30, 88–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Klein, M. W., Maxson, C. L., & Cunningham, L. C. (1991). Crack, street gangs and violence. Criminology, 29, 623–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kposowa, A. J. (1998a). The impact of immigration on the United States economy. Lanham: University Press of American.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kposowa, A. J. (1998b). The effect of occupation and industry on homicide victimization in the United States. Homicide Studies, 3, 47–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. LaFree, G. (1999). Declining violent crime rates in the 1990s: predicting crime booms and busts. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 145–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Larsen, L. (2004). The foreign born population in the United States: 2003. Washington: Current Population Reports, P20-551, U.S. Census Bureau.

  35. Lee, M. T., Martinez, R., & Rosenfeld, J. (2001). Does immigration increase homicide? Negative evidence from three border cities. The Sociological Quarterly, 42, 559–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lopez, D. A., & Brummett, P. O. (2003). Gang membership and acculturation: ARSMA-II and choloization. Crime & Delinquency, 49, 627–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Maier-Katkin, D., Stemmler, S., & Stretesky, P. (1995). Immigration and the emergence of right-wing violence in unified Germany. Crime Law & Social Change, 24, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Martin, S. E., Maxwell, C. E., White, H. R., & Zhang, Y. (2004). Trends in alcohol use, cocaine use, and crime: 1989–1998. Journal of Drug Issues, 34, 333–359.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Martinez, R. (2006). Coming to America: the impact of the new immigration on crime. In R. Martinez Jr. & A. Valenzuela Jr. (Eds.), Immigration and crime: race, ethnicity, and violence (pp. 1–19). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Martinez, R., & Lee, M. T. (2000). On immigration and crime. In G. LaFree (Ed.), The nature of crime: Continuity and change, vol. 2 of Criminal Justice 2000. Washington: National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Martinez, R., & Valenzuela, A. (eds). (2006). Immigration and crime: Race, ethnicity, and violence. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Martinez, R., Lee, M. T., & Nielsen, A. L. (2004). Segmented assimilation, local context, and determinants of drug violence in Miami and San Diego. Does ethnicity and immigration matter? International Migration Review, 38, 131–157.

    Google Scholar 

  43. McGuire, S. (2007). Fractured migrant families. Family & Community Health, 30, 178–188.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Morao, K. (2006). Domestic violence and the state. Georgetown Journal of Gender & the Law, 7, 787–817.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Myrstol, B. (2003). Drug use trends among Anchorage arrestees: 1999–2001. Alaska Justice Forum, 19, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Murphey, D. D. (1994). The world population explosion and the cost of uncontrolled immigration. Journal of Social, Political & Economic Studies, 19, 481–510.

    Google Scholar 

  47. National Commission on Law Observance and Enforcement. (1931). Crime and the foreign born. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Preston, J. (2008). U.S. to Speed Deportation of Criminals in Jail. New York Times On-Line http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/15/us/15immig.html?ref=washington. January 15.

  49. Progrebin, M. R., & Poole, E. D. (1989). South Korean immigrants and crime: a case study. The Journal of Politics, 1, 47–79.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Reckless, W., & Smith, H. (1932). Juvenile delinquency. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Reid, S. T. (2006). Crime and criminology (11th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Reid, L. W., Weiss, H., Adelman, R. M., & Jaret, C. (2005). The immigration-crime relationship: Evidence across US metropolitan areas. Social Science Research, 34, 757–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Romero, M. (2006). Racial profiling and immigration law enforcement: rounding up of usual suspects in the Latino community. Critical Sociology, 32, 447–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Rumbault, R. G., Gonzales, R. G., Komaie, G., Morgan, C. V., & Tafoya-Estrada, R. (2006). Immigration and incarceration: patterns and predictors of imprisonment among first- and second-generation young adults. In R. Martinez Jr. & A. Valenzuela Jr. (Eds.), Immigration and crime: Race, ethnicity, and violence (pp. 64–89). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Samuels, J. (2000). 1999 Annual report on drug use among adult and juvenile arrestees. Washington: Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing “neighborhood effects”: social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 443–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Sellin, T. (1938). Culture conflict and crime. New York: Social Science Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1969). Juvenile delinquency in urban areas (Rev Edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Singh, G. K., & Kposowa, A. J. (1996). Occupation-specific earnings attainment of Asian Indians and Whites in the United States: gender and nativity differentials across class strata. Applied Behavioral Science Review, 4, 137–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Smith, J. P., & Edmonston, B. (1997). The new Americans: Economic, demographic, and fiscal effects of immigration. Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  61. South, S. J., & Messner, S. F. (2000). Crime and demography: Multiple linkages, reciprocal relations. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 83–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Stofflet, E. H. (1941). The European immigrant and his children. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 217, 84–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Sutherland, E. H. (1924). Criminology. Philadelphia: Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Sutherland, E. H. (1934). Principles of criminology. Philadelphia: Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Sutherland, E. H., & Cressey, D. R. (1960). Principles of criminology (6th ed.). New York: Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Sutherland, E. H., & Cressey, D. R. (1978). Principles of criminology (10th ed.). New York: Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Tanton, J., & Lutton, W. (1993). Immigration and criminality in the U.S.A. Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies, 18, 217–235.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Tanton, J., & Lutton, W. (1994). The immigration invasion. Petoskey: The Social Contract.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Taylor, P. (1971). The distant magnet. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Tsunokai, G., & Kposowa, A. (2002). Asian gangs in the United States: the current state of the research literature. Crime, Law & Social Change, 37, 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Tsunokai, G., & Kposowa, A. (2009). Explaining gang involvement and delinquency among Asian Americans: an empirical test of general strain theory. Journal of Gang Research, 16, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  72. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2005). Profile of the Foreign-Born Population of the United States: 1997. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. Current Population Reports Special Studies P23–195.

  73. U. S. General Accounting Office. (2002). Immigration benefit fraud: Focused approach is need to address problems. Washington: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Van Vechten, C. C. (1941). Criminality of the foreign born. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 32, 139–147.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Vélez, M., Krivo, L. J., & Peterson, R. D. (2003). Structural inequality and homicide: an assessment of the Black–White gap in killings. Criminology, 41, 645–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Warne, F. J. (1913). The immigrant invasion. New York: Dodd, Mead and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Warr, M. (1998). Life-course transitions and desistance from crime. Criminology, 36, 183–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Welch, M. (2002). Detained immigration laws and the expanding INS jail complex. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Welch, M. (2003). Ironies of social construction and the criminalization of immigrants. Crime, Law & Social Change, 39, 319–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Yeager, M. G. (1996). Immigrants and criminality. Ottawa: Ministry of Citizenship and Immigration, Government of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Augustine Joseph Kposowa.

Additional information

The first author graciously acknowledges the support provided him during his stay at Western Washington University in 2006 to initiate the writing of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kposowa, A.J., Adams, M.A. & Tsunokai, G.T. Citizenship status and arrest patterns in the United States: evidence from the arrestee drug abuse monitoring program. Crime Law Soc Change 53, 159–181 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-009-9224-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-009-9224-y

Keywords

  • Crime Rate
  • Violent Crime
  • Immigration Policy
  • Property Crime
  • Citizenship Status