Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Power-seeking crime? The professional thief versus the professional launderer

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Relating the concept of power to motives and objectives for criminal activities results in different images of criminals and their motivations. In this article, we aim to reflect on two different forms of crime (burglary versus money laundering) starting from a power perspective. We describe how the pursuit of power may or may not be related to crime, perpetrators and the policies that have been developed to prevent or repress these types of crime. By examining the motives behind both burglary and money laundering, we try to make clear how the concept of power and power pursuit leads to different rationales in criminal conduct. We try to determine to what extent ‘rational choice’ plays a role in this respect. As a conclusion, we argue that ‘power’ as such influences patterns of crime, victimisation and societal reactions (by means of criminal policy). The extent to which power accumulation is an outcome of crime, will in part determine the social reaction to crime and as a result, the perceived threat of crime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Taking into account the fact that these are cases that are actually reported to the FIU, which implies that this represents a specific group of money launderers—the ones that are caught laundering.

References

  1. CTIF-CFI (2008). Annual Report 2007. Brussel.

  2. De Standaard (24 December 1999). DRIE. Jo Lernout & Pol Hauspie.

  3. De Standaard (22 July 2006). Verdachten Lernout & Hauspie riskeren vijf jaar cel.

  4. De Standaard (23 May 2007) 200 nieuwe burgerlijke partijen op tweede procesdag L&H.

  5. De Standaard (18 October 2007) Dexia en KPMG stellen zich burgerlijke partij in L&H proces.

  6. De Standaard (7 May 2008). Rijkste Belg wordt verdacht van witwassen.

  7. Dowding, K. (1996). Power (Concepts in Social Thought). University of Minnesota Press.

  8. Heiskala, R. (2001). “Theorizing power: Weber, Parsons, Foucault and neostructuralism”. Social Science Information, 40(2), 241–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoogenboom, B. (2006). “Voorbij goed en kwaad van witwassen”. Justitiële Verkenningen, 32(2), 76–86.

    Google Scholar 

  10. International Monetary Fund (2004). The IMF and the Fight against Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism. A Fact Sheet.

  11. Kennedy, A. (2005). “Dead Fish across the Trail: Illustrations of Money Laundering Methods”. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 8(4), 305–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kleemans, E., Brienen, M., et al. (2002). Georganiseerde criminaliteit in Nederland, Tweede rapportage op basis van de WODC-monitor. Den Haag: WODC.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kochan, N. (2006). The Washing Machine. Money, Crime and Terror in the Offshore System. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Levi, M. (1996). Money Laundering: Risks and Countermeasures. In A. Graycar, & P. Grabosky (Eds.), Money Laundering in the 21st century: risks and countermeasures. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Levi, M. & Reuter P. (2006). Money Laundering Chicago.

  16. Masciandaro, D. (1999). “Money Laundering: the Economics of Regulation”. European Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 225–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Naylor, R. (2007). Criminal profits, terror dollars and nonsense. Tax Justice NL, Seminar on Money Laundering, Tax Evasion and Financial Regulation. Transnational Institute Amsterdam.

  18. Nelen, H. (2004). “Hit them where it hurts most? The proceeds-of-crime approach in the Netherlands”. Crime, Law and Social Change, 41(5), 517–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Passas, N., & Groskin, R. B. (2001). “Overseeing and overlooking: The US federal authorities’ response to money laundering and other misconduct at BCCI”. Crime, Law and Social Change, 35(1), 141–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ruggiero, V. (2007). ‘It’s the Economy, Stupid! Classifying Power Crime’. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 35, 163–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stessens, G. (2000). Money Laundering: A New International Law Enforcement Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Suendorf, U. (2001). Geldwäsche: eine kriminologische Untersuchung. Neuwied: Luchterhand.

    Google Scholar 

  23. U.S. Department of State (1998). 1997 International Narcotics Control Strategy Report. Washington, DC, Released by the Bureau for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs.

  24. Unger, B. (2006). The amounts and effects of money laundering. Report for the Ministry of Finance. Den Haag.

  25. van Duyne, P. (1997). Money Laundering. Pavlov’s dog and beyond. European Regional Fraud Conference. Amsterdam

  26. van Duyne, P., & de Miranda, H. (1999). “The emperor’s clothes of disclosure: Hot money and suspect disclosures”. Crime, Law and Social Change, 31(3), 245–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vande Walle, G. (2002). La salle de jeu des criminels en col blanc raffinés. Criminalité financière et économique en Belgique. In P. Ponsaers, & V. Ruggiero (Eds.), La Criminalité Economique et Financière en Europe (pp. 77–98). Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Verwee, I., Ponsaers, P., et al. (2007). Inbreken is mijn vak. Textuur en praktijk van woninginbraak. Den Haag: Boom Juridische uitgevers.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Williams, P. (1994). ‘Transnational Criminal Organisations and International Security’. Survival, 36(1), 96–113.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wright Mills, Ch. (1956). The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Antoinette Verhage or Paul Ponsaers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verhage, A., Ponsaers, P. Power-seeking crime? The professional thief versus the professional launderer. Crime Law Soc Change 51, 399–412 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-008-9167-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-008-9167-8

Keywords

Navigation