Underused potentials for criminology: Applying the sociology of knowledge to terrorism


Knowledge has for a long time been a central category in criminological thought, the etiological and reaction sides alike. On the etiological side, rational choice, neutralization techniques, the learning and unlearning of motivations, practices and codes, and, lately, efforts toward a cognitive criminology exemplify approaches that refer implicitly or explicitly to ‘knowledge’. Yet, with the exception of George Herbert Mead’s work, the sociology of knowledge has barely been explicitly used. This paper argues that the conscious consideration of the sociology of knowledge, including neo-Durkheimian, neo-Marxist, and neo-Weberian traditions, promises great benefit to criminological thought. Such consideration sheds light on the distribution across time and space of cognitive and normative tools that contribute to patterns of norm breaking behavior. A brief overview of the implicit use of ‘knowledge’ in criminological theory is followed by an elaboration of the potential benefits for criminology from incorporating leading traditions in the sociology of knowledge. The article concludes with an illustration for the case of terrorism as it rises simultaneously, but seeks distinct targets, across regions of the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. 1.

    Aminzade, R. (1984). Capitalist industrialization and patterns of industrial protest: A comparative urban study of 19th century France. American Sociological Review, 49, 437–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1985). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Black, D. (1983). Crime as Social Control. American Sociological Review, 48, 34–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Black, D. (2002). Terrorism as social control. Sociological Theory, 22(1), 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Blumer, H. (1998). Race prejudice as a sense of group position. In M. W. Hughey (Eds.), New tribalisms: The resurgence of race and ethnicity (pp. 31–40). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Cohen, A. K. (1955). Delinquent boys: The culture of the gang. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Coser, R. L., & Coser, L. (1979). Jonestown as a perverse utopia. Dissent, 26, 158–163.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Durkheim, E. (1995). The elementary forms of religious life. Translated and with an introduction by K. E. Fields. New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1912).

  11. 11.

    Feldman-Savelsberg, P., Ndonko, F., & Schmidt-Ehry, B. (2000). Sterilizing vaccines or the politics of the womb: Retrospective study of a rumor in Cameroon. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 14, 159–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Fine, G. A. (1996). Reputational entrepreneurs and the memory of incompetence: Melting supporters, partisan warriors, and images of President Harding. American Journal of Sociology, 101, 1159–1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Fine, G. A. (2001). Difficult reputations: Collective memories of the evil, inept, and controversial. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Fine, G. A., Campion-Vincent, V., & Heath, C. (Eds.). (2005). Rumor mills: The social impact of rumor and legend. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.

  15. 15.

    Foucault, M. (1975). Surveiller et punir: La naisscance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., & Rudolph, J. L. (2002). Gender, crime and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 107(4), 990–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Gorski, P. S. (2003). The disciplinary revolution: Calvinism and the rise of the state in early modern Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Hagan, J. (2002). Class and crime in war-time: Lessons of the American Vietnam war resistance in Canada. Crime, Law and Social Change, 37(2), 137–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Hagan, J. (2003). Justice in the Balkans: Prosecuting war crimes in the Hague tribunal. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hagan, J., & Levi, R. (2005). Crimes of war and the force of law. Social Forces, 83(4), 1499–1534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hagan, J., Merkens, H., & Boehnke, K. (1995). Delinquency and disdain: Social capital and the control of right-wing extremism among East and West Berlin youth. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 1028–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Halbwachs, M. (1992). On collective memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kalberg, S. (1987). West German and American interaction forms: One level of structured misunderstanding. Theory, Culture & Society, 4(4), 603–618.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    King, R. D. (2005). When law and society disagree: Group threat, legacies of the past, and the organizational context of hate crime law enforcement. PhD dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

  26. 26.

    Lang, G. E., & Lang, K. (1988). Recognition and renown: The survival of artistic reputation. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 79–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Mannheim, K. (1952). The problem of generations. In P. Kecskemeti (Ed.), Essays on the sociology of knowledge (pp. 276–320). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Mannheim, K. (1970). Ideology and utopia: An introduction to the sociology of knowledge. Translated from the German by L. Wirth and E. Shils. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. (Original work published 1936).

  29. 29.

    Mannheim, K. (1986). Conservatism: A contribution to the sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1925).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Matza, D. (1964). Delinquency and drift. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Matza, D., & Sykes, G. (1961). Juvenile delinquency and subterranean values. American Sociological Review, 26, 712–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Melossi, D. (2001). The cultural embeddedness of social control: Reflections on the comparison of Italian and North-American cultures concerning punishment. Theoretical Criminology, 5, 403–424.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3, 672–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Messner, S. F., & Rosenfeld, R. (1994). Crime and the American dream. Belmont: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Olick, J. K. (1999). Genre memories and memory genres: A dialogical analysis of May 8, 1945 commemorations in the Federal Republic of Germany. American Sociological Review, 64, 381–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Olick, J. K., & Levy, D. (1997). Collective memory and cultural constraint: Holocaust myth and rationality in German politics. American Sociological Review, 62, 921–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Oswald, M. (1994). Psychologie des richterlichen Strafens. Stuttgart: Enke.

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Pager, D. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108(5), 937–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Savelsberg, J. J. (1994). Knowledge, domination, and criminal punishment. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 911–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Savelsberg, J. J. (2004). Religion, historical contingencies, and criminal law: The German case and beyond. Law and Social Inquiry, 29(2), 373–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Savelsberg, J. J., Cleveland, L. L., & King, R. D. (2004). Institutional environments and scholarly work, American criminology, 1951–1993. Social Forces, 82, 1275–1302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Savelsberg, J. J., & Flood, S. M. (2004). Criminological knowledge: Period and cohort effects in scholarship. Criminology, 42, 1009–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Savelsberg, J. J., & King, R. D. (2005). Institutionalizing collective memories of hate: Law and law enforcement in Germany and the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 111(2), 579–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Savelsberg, J. J., King, R. D., & Cleveland, L. L. (2002). Politicized scholarship: Science on crime and the state. Social Problems, 49, 327–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Savelsberg, J. J., & Sampson, R. J. (2002). Mutual engagement: Sociology and criminology? Crime, Law and Social Change, 37, 99–105.

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Schwartz, B. (1982). The social context of commemoration: A study in collective memory. Social Forces, 61, 374–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Short, J. F. Jr. (2002). Criminology, the Chicago school, and sociological theory. Crime, Law and Social Change, 37(2), 107–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Short, J. F. Jr., & Hughes, L. H. (in press). Criminology, criminologists, and the sociological enterprise. In Craig Calhoun (Ed.), Sociology in America: The American Sociological Association Centennial History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  49. 49.

    Silbey, S. (2002). Mutual engagement: Criminology and the sociology of law. Crime, Law and Social Change, 37(2), 163–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Small, M. L. (2004). Villa Victoria: The transformation of social capital in a Boston barrio. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Smith, P. S. (2003). Narrating the guillotine: Punishment technology as myth and symbol. Theory, Culture & Society, 20(5), 27–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Stafford, M. C., & Warr, M. (1993). A reconceptualization of general and specific deterrence. Crime and Delinquency, 30(2), 123–135.

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A structural version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Sutherland, E. H., Cressey, D. R., & Luckenbill, D. (1992). Principles of criminology. Dix Hills, NY: General Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Sutton, J. (2000). Imprisonment and social classification in five common law democracies, 1955–1985. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 350–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Swidler, A. (1987). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22, 664–670.

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Tyler, T. R., & Boeckmann, R. (1997). Three strikes and you are out, but why?: The psychology of public support for punishing rule breakers. Law and Society Review, 31, 237–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Uggen, C., & Manza, J. (2002). Democratic contraction? Political consequences of felon disenfranchisement in the United States. American Sociological Review, 67(6), 777–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Vaughan, D. (2002). Criminology and the sociology of organizations. Crime, Law and Social Change, 37(2), 117–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Weber, M. (1963). The sociology of religion (E. Fischoff, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.

  62. 62.

    Wheeler, S., & Rothman, M. L. (1982). The organization as a weapon in white collar crime. Michigan Law Review, 80, 1406–1426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joachim J. Savelsberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Savelsberg, J.J. Underused potentials for criminology: Applying the sociology of knowledge to terrorism. Crime Law Soc Change 46, 35–50 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-006-9046-0

Download citation


  • Social Capital
  • Social Control
  • Knowledge System
  • American Sociological Review
  • Collective Memory