Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Differential social organization, collective action, and crime

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article elaborates and extends Sutherland’s [Principles of criminology (4th ed.), Lippincott, Philadelphia, Sutherland (1947)] concept of differential social organization, the sociological counterpart to his social psychological theory of differential association. Differential social organization contains a static structural component, which explains crime rates across groups, as well as a dynamic collective action component, which explains changes in crime rates over time. I argue that by drawing on George Herbert Mead’s [Mind, self, and society. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Mead (1934)] theories of symbolic interaction and social control, we can conceptualize organization in favor of, and against, crime as collective behavior. We can then integrate theoretical mechanisms of models of collective behavior, including social network ties, collective action frames, and threshold models of collective action. I illustrate the integrated theory using examples of social movements against crime, neighborhood collective efficacy, and the code of the street.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akers, R. L. (1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence and the moral life of the inner city. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bandura, A. (1994). Self efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior, vol. 4 (pp. 71–81). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Becker, H. S. (1953). Becoming a marijuana user. American Sociological Review, 59, 235–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Free.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bernstein, B. (1971). Class, codes and control, vol. 1. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Blasi, A. (1980). Bridging moral cognition and moral action: A critical review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 1–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Blau, P. (1974). Parameters of social structure. American Sociological Review, 39, 615–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Blumer, H. (1939). Collective behavior. In R. E. Park (Ed.), Principles of sociology. New York: Barnes & Noble.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Blumstein, A., & Cohen, J. (1987). Characterizing criminal careers. Science, 237, 985–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Burgess, R. L., & Akers R. L. (1966). A differential association-reinforcement theory of criminal behavior. Social Problems, 19, 101–113.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carpendale, J. I. M. (2000). Kohlberg and piaget on stages of moral reasoning. Developmental Review, 20, 181–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cloward, R., & Ohlin, L. E. (1960). Delinquency and opportunity: A theory of juvenile gangs. New York: Free.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Colby, A., & Kohlberg, L. (Eds.) (1987). The measurement of moral judgement, vol. 1–2. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  17. Colby, A., Kohlberg, L., Gibbs, J., Lieberman, M., Fisher, K., & Saltzstein, H. D. (1983). A longitudinal study of moral judgement. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 48, 1–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Coser, R. (1975). The complexity of roles as seedbed of individual autonomy. In L. Coser (Ed.), The idea of social structure: Essays in honor of Robert Merton. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people’s money. Glencoe, Illinois: Free.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cressey, D. R. (1960). Epidemiology and individual conduct: A case from criminology. Pacific Sociological Review, 3, 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dewey, J. (1958). Experience and nature. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Emerson, M. O., Yancy, G., & Chai, K. J. (2001). Does race matter in residential segregation? Exploring the preferences of white Americans. American Sociological Review, 66, 922–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fine, G. A., & Kleinman, S. (1979). Rethinking subculture: An interactionist analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fireman, B., & Gamson, W. A. (1979). Utilitarian logic in the resource mobilization perspective. In M. N. Zald & J. D. McCarthy (Eds.), The dynamics of social movements (pp. 8–44). Cambridge: Winthrop.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Galliher, J. F., & Walker A. (1977). The Puzzle of the Social Origins of the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937. Social Problems, 24, 367–376.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gamson, W. A. (1990). Strategy of social protest (2nd ed.). Belmont, California: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Garland, D. (1990). Punishment and modern society. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gaylord, M. S. & Galliher J. F. (1988). The criminology of Edwin Sutherland. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper Colophon.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Granovetter, M. (1978). Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 1420–1443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Grattet, R., Jenness, V., & Curry, T. (1998). The homogenization and differentiation of hate crime law in the United States, 1978–1995: Innovation and diffusion in the criminalization of bigotry. American Sociological Review, 63, 286–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Himmelstein, J. L. (1983). The strange career of marihuana: politics and ideology of drug control in America. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Horowitz, R. (1983). Honor and the American dream. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Jenness, V., & Broad, K. (1997). Hate crimes. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Jenness, V., & Grattet, R. (2001). Making hate a crime: From social movement to law enforcement. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Joas, H. (1985). George Herbert Mead: A contemporary reexamination of his thought. Cambridge: Polity (translated by R. Meyer).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Killian, L., & Turner, R. (1972). Collective behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kohlberg, L. (1963). The development of children’s orientation toward a moral order: I. Sequence in the development of moral thought. Vita Humana, 6, 11–33.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lyons, C. J. (2006). Social (dis)organization and racially motivated crime in Chicago. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Washington.

  46. Matsueda, R. L. (1982). Testing control theory and differential association: a casual modeling approach. American sociological review, 47, 489–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Matsueda, R. L. (1988). The current state of differential association theory. Crime and Delinquency, 34, 277–306.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Matsueda, R. L. (2006). Criminological implications of the thought of George Herbert Mead. In M. Deflem (Ed.), Sociological theory and criminological research: views from Europe and the United States. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Matsueda, R. L., & Heimer, K. (1997). A symbolic interactionist theory of role transitions, role, commitments, and delinquency. In T. Thornberry (Ed.), Advances in criminology theory: developmental theories of crime and delinquency,, vol. 7 (pp. 163–214). New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Matza, D. (1964). Delinquency and drift. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  51. McCarthy, J. D. (1994). Activists, authorities, and media framing of drunk driving. In E. Larana, H. Johnston, & J. Gusfield (Eds.), New social movements: From ideology to identity (pp. 133–167). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Mead, G. H. (1964). Selected writings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (edited by A. J. Reck).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Miller, D. L. (1973). George Herbert Mead: Self, language, and the world. Austin, Texas: University of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Morenoff, J., Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. (2001). Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology, 39, 517–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Pattillo-McCoy, M. (1999). Black picket fences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Sampson, R. J. (2004). Neighborhood and community: Collective efficacy and community safety. New Economy, 11, 106–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J., & Earls, F. (1999). Beyond social capital: Spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. American Sociological Review, 64, 633–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1999). Systematic social observation of public spaces. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 603–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Schelling, T. (1971). Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1, 143–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1969). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Revised edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Shibutani, T. (1955). Reference groups as perspectives. American Journal of Sociology, 60, 562–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Short, J. F. Jr., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1965). Group process and gang delinquency. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man: social and rational. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Small, M. L. (2002). Culture, cohorts, and social organization theory: Understanding local participation in a latino housing project. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 1–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1992). Master frames and cycles of protest. In A. D. Morris & C. M. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Snow, D. A., & Oliver, P. E. (1995). Social movements and collective behavior: Social psychological dimensions and considerations. In K. S. Cook, G. A., Fine & J. S. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 571–599).

  68. Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B. Jr., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment process, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51, 464–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Sutherland, E H., (1926). The biological and sociological processes. Papers and Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Society, 20, 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Sutherland, E. H. (1939). Principles of criminology (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Sutherland, E. H. (1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Sutherland, E. H. (1973 [1942]). Development of the theory. In K. Schuessler (Ed.), Edwin H. Sutherland on analyzing crime (pp. 13–29). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Sutherland, E. H. (1973 [1943]). Wartime crime. In K. Schuessler (Ed.), Edwin H. Sutherland on analyzing crime (pp. 120–128). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Sweetser, F. L., Jr. (1942). A new emphasis for neighborhood research. American Sociological Review, 7, 525–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22, 664–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Tannenbaum, F. (1938). Crime and the community. Boston: Ginn and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Thomas, W. I., & Znaniecki, F. (1958 [1918]). The polish peasant in Europe and America, vols.1 and 2. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Thrasher, F. M. (1927). The gang. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Turner, R., & Killian, L. (1957). Collective behavior. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Venkatesh, S. (2000). American project: The rise and fall of a Modern Ghetto. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, University of Washington, 202 Savery Hall, Box 353340, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA

    Ross L. Matsueda

Authors
  1. Ross L. Matsueda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ross L. Matsueda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matsueda, R.L. Differential social organization, collective action, and crime. Crime Law Soc Change 46, 3–33 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-006-9045-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-006-9045-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation