Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Parliamentary Enquiry on Fraud in the Dutch Construction Industry Collusion as Concept Between Corruption and State-Corporate Crime

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In December 2002 the final report of the Royal Commission concerning Irregularities in the Dutch Construction Industry was published. The broadcasting of the public hearings in the months before was breaking news. It proved the whole sector participated in illegal practices, ranging from fraud, unjustified subsidies and license issuance to real bribery and money or favours to individual politicians or higher-ranking public servants; from undercutting the market, monopolisation and forcing up prices, to selective control by partial inspectorates. In his article the author, an advisor to the Commission, summarises the mayor types of irregularities the report reveals with special interest in the network dimension they had in common. The Commission spoke about collusion as the key problem. Collusion can be described as secret agreement for a fraudulent or deceitful purpose, especially to defeat the course of law. Theoretically this concept can have many faces. In this parliamentary enquiry it was illustrated in three ways: as anti-trust illegalities, as a kind of governmental crime, and as kind of corruption. The report showed a long-lasting structural interrelation between these three types with a special role for the twining between collusion and corruption. Corruption research often mentions collusion as a cause, condition or explanation of corruption. But rarely is that argument illustrated in detail. This article seeks to do so. Especially when corruption is hard to grasp in modern society, a solution could be to take collusion as ‘a network offence’ more seriously. The collusion subsystems revealed hereare relatively stable networks, invulnerable to individualised anti-corruption legislation. The author pleads for stricter rules governing state-corporate interrelationships, more severe control on network abuses, and the introduction of minimum standards for public contracting as proposed by Transparency International.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anechiarico, F. and J. Jacobs, The Pursuit of Absolute Integrity; How Corruption Control Makes Government Ineffective (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, I., “How Cartels Punish: A Structural Theory of Self-enforcing Collusion,” Columbia Law Review, 1993 (87: 217), 295–323.

  • Ayres, I. and J. Braithwaite, Responsive Regulation; Transcending the Deregulation Debate (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannenberg, B. and W. Schaupensteiner, Korruption in Deutschland. Portrait einer Wachstumbranche (Munchen: Beck, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, M.L., “Denying the Guilty Mind,” Criminology, 1985(25), 583–607.

  • Bufacchi, V. and S. Burgess, Italy Since 1989. Events and Interpretations (London: Palgrave MacMillan, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Claussen, H.R. u.a. (eds) Korruption im öffentlichen Dienst (Berlin: Heymann, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinnard, M. and R. Quinney (eds), Criminal Behavior Systems (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinnard, M and P. Yaeger, Corporate Crime (New York: Free Press, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, T. Construction and Fraud [available via: http://www.maxima-group.com/a-0509.shtml], 2003.

  • Dalgliesh, R., Construction Industry Perspective, (Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Doig, A., “A Fragmented Organizational Approach to Fraud in a European Context: The Case of the United Kingdom Public Sector,” European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 1995 (3: 2), 48–64.

  • Eigen, P. and Chr. Eigen – Zucchi, “Korruption und globale öffentliche,” Guter PROKLA 2003 (33: 2), 257–281.

  • Fisse, B. and J. Braithwaite, The Impact of Publicity on Corporate Offenders (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geis, G., “The Heavy Electrical Equipment Antitrust Cases of 1961,” in G. Geis and R.F. Meier (eds), White Collar Crime, Offenses in Business, Politics and the Professions (New York: Free Press, 1977), 117–132.

  • Goudie, A. and D. Stasavage, “A Framework for Analysis of Corruption,” Crime, Law & Social Change, 1998 (29), 113–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huberts, L.W. and J.M. Nelen, Corruptie in het Nederlandse openbaar bestuur; Omvang, aard en afdoening (Den Haag: Lemma, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. with C. Friel and R. Radick, Gotham Unbound, How New York City was Liberated from the Grip of Organized Crime (New York: New York University Press, 1999).

  • Jamieson, K., The Organization of Corporate Crime: Dynamics of Anti Trust Violation (London: Sage, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T., The Dark Heart of Italy (London: Faber and Faber, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilchling, M., “Tracing, Seizing and Confiscating Proceeds from Corruption (and other Illigal Conduct) Within or Outside the Criminal Justice System,” European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 2001 (9/4), 264–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R., The Space Shuttle Challenger Explosion; A Case Study of State-Corporate Crime, in: K. Schlegel and D. Weisburd (eds), White Collar Crime Reconsided (Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1992), 214–243.

  • Kramer, R. R. Michalowski and D. Kauzlarich, “The Origins and Development of the Concept and Theory of State–Corporate Crime,” Crime & Delinquency, 2002 (48: 2), 263–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, J., Wirtschaftskriminalität; Schleichewege zum grossen geld Frankfurt a/M: Fisher., 1992.

  • Mamiya, J., Government and Contractors Prove: It Takes Two to ‘Dango’ Tokyo Business Today July 1995, 28–31.

  • Minor, W.W., “Techniques of Neutralization: A Reconceptualization and Empirical Examination,” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1981 (18), 295–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möhrenschlager, M., “Strafrechtliche Vorhaben zur Bekampfung der Korruption auf nationaler und internationaler,” Ebene Juristen Zeitung, 1996, 822–831.

  • Nelen, H. and A. Nieuwendijk, Geen ABC, Analyse van rijksrechercheonderzoeken naar ambtelijke en bestuurlijke corruptie (Den Haag: BOOM, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, R.P., “Corruption Networks and Implications for Ethical Corruption Reform,” Journal of Business Ethics, 2003 (42), 125–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nötzel, M., Investigation Strategies and Tactics in the Prosecution of Corruption Offences: Experiences from Germany, in C. Fijnaut and L. Huberts (eds.), Corruption, Integrety and Law Enforcement (The Hague: Kluwer, 2002) 49–58.

  • OESO, Competiton Committee On Effective Action Against Hard Core Cartels – Second Report (Paris: Oeso ed., 2002).

  • PECB (Parlementaire Enquete Commissie Bouwnijverheid), De Bouw uit de Schaduw (Eindrapport, Den Haag: SDU, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • PECB (Parlementaire Enquete Commissie Bouwnijverheid), De Bouw uit de Schaduw; deel 2 (Verhoren, Den Haag: SDU, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pijl, D., “Corruptiebestrijding dient serieus genomen te worden,” in W. Valkenburg en A. de Weert (red) Corruptie, verschijningsvormen, opsporing, bestrijding en voorkoming (Lelystad: Vermande, 1998) 59–74.

  • Posner, R. and F. Easterbrook, Antitrust, Cases, Economics, Notes and Other Materials (New York: Columbia University Press, 1981).

  • Quaedvlieg, H., Ondernemende autoriteiten? Een onderzoek naar de handhaving van het Nederlandse en communautaire kartelrecht (Deventer: Kluwer, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichman, N., Insider Trading, in M. Tonry and A.J. Reiss Jr (eds.), Beyond the Law (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993), 55–96.

  • Rose-Ackerman, S., Corruption and Government; Causes, Consequences and Reform (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rügemer, W., “La Justice Allemande et la,” Corruption Déviance et Société, 1996 (20: 3), 275–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rügemer, W., “Global Corruption,” PROKLA 2003 (33: 2), 235–256.

  • Savona, E.U., “Beyond Criminal Law in Devising Anticorruption Policies; Lessons from the Italian Experience,” European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 1995 (3: 2), 20–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaupensteiner, W., Korruptions – Kartelle Kriminalsitik, 1990, 509–515.

  • Schaupensteiner, W., “Submissionsabsprachen und Korruption im öffentlichen”, Bauwesen Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik, hft 1993 (7), 250–162.

  • Schaupensteiner, W., “Gezamtconzept zur Eindammung der Korruption’ Neue” Zeitschrift für Strafrecht, 1996, 409–416.

  • Schnorr, S. and V. Wissing, “Korruptionsbekämpfung,” Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik, heft 2002 (6), 279–280.

  • Shapiro, S., The Wayward Capitalists (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A. and R. Vishny, “Corruption,” Quaterly Journal of Economics, 1993 (108: 3), 599–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommermann, K.P., “Brauchen wir eine Ethik des öffentlichren Dienstes?,” Verwaltungs Archiv, 1998, 290–305.

  • Sykes, G.M. and D. Matza, “Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency,” American Sociological Review, 1957 (22), 664–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International, Global Corruption Report, Corruption in the construction and post–conflict reconstruction (London: Pluto Press, 2005).

  • Upham, F.K., Law and Social Change in Post – War Japan (Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Heuvel, G., Corporate Crime in East and West: in Search of Collusion, in H. Strang and J. Vernon (eds), International Trends in Crime: East Meets (West Canberra: AIC, 1992), 212–137.

  • Vander Beken, T., “A Multidisciplinary Approach for Detection and Investigation of Corruption,” in C. Fijnaut and L. Huberts (eds), Corruption, Integrity and Law Enforcement (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002), 269–282.

  • Van Wijk, J. e.a., Op deugdelijke grondslag; een explorerende studie naar de private forensische accountancy (Zeist: Kerckebosch, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Varese, F., Pervasive Corruption, Economic Crime in Russia (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2000) in A. Ledeneva, M. Kurkchiyan 99–112.

  • Varese, F., The Russian Maffia. Private Protection in a New Market Economy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedel, J.R., Collision and Collusion: The Strange Case of Western Aid to Eastern Europe (New York: Palgrave, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedel, J.R., “Corruption and Organized Crime in Post – Communist States: New Ways of Manifesting Old Patterns,” Trends in Organized Crime, 2003 (7: 1), 3–61.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Law, University of Maastricht, P.O. Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands

    Grat Van Den Heuvel

Authors
  1. Grat Van Den Heuvel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grat Van Den Heuvel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Den Heuvel, G. The Parliamentary Enquiry on Fraud in the Dutch Construction Industry Collusion as Concept Between Corruption and State-Corporate Crime. Crime Law Soc Change 44, 133–151 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-006-9009-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-006-9009-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation