The aim of the current study was to understand how gangs have changed in the past 10 years since Pitts’ (2008) study in the London Borough of Waltham Forest. The study undertook interviews with 21 practitioners working on gang-related issues and 10 young people affected by gangs or formerly embedded in them. Two focus groups involving 37 participants from key agencies then explored the preliminary findings and contributed to a conceptualization of a new operating model of gangs. The study found that local gangs had evolved into more organized and profit-oriented entities than a decade earlier. The new operating model rejected visible signs of gang membership as ‘bad for business’ because they attracted unwanted attention from law enforcement agencies. Faced with a saturated drugs market in London, gangs moved out to capture drugs markets in smaller UK towns in ‘county lines’ activities. This more business-oriented ethos has changed the meaning of both territory and violence. While gang members in the original study described an emotional connection with their postcode, territory is increasingly regarded as a marketplace to be protected. Similarly, violence has moved from an expressive means of reinforcing gang identity to being increasingly used as an instrumental means of protecting business interests. The current study offers a rare opportunity to gain a picture of gangs at two time periods and contributes to work on the contested nature of UK gangs and renewed interest in gang evolution. These findings have important implications for local authorities and criminal justice agencies who need to address the profit motive of gang activity directly.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Aldridge, J., & Medina, J. (2008). Youth gangs in an English city. Swindon: ESRC.
Alexander, C. (2008). (Re)thinking ‘gangs’. London: Runnymede Trust.
Amnesty International UK. (2018). Trapped in the matrix. London: Author.
Ayling, J. (2011). Gang change and evolutionary theory. Crime, Law and Social Change, 56, 1–26.
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), pp. 77–101.
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2013) Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. London: SAGE Publications.
Campana, P., & Varese, F. (2018). Organized crime in the United Kingdom: Illegal governance of markets and communities. The British Journal of Criminology, 58, 1381–1400.
Clarke, R. V. (1980). Situational crime prevention: Theory and practice. British Journal of Criminology, 20, 136–147.
Coomber, R., & Moyle, L. (2017). The changing shape of street-level heroin and crack supply in England: Commuting, holidaying and cuckooing drug dealers across ‘county lines’. British Journal of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azx068.
Decker, S. H. (1996). Collective and normative features of gang violence. Justice Quarterly, 13, 243–264.
Decker, S. H., Katz, C., & Webb, V. (2008). Understanding the black box of gang organization: Implications for involvement in violent crime, drug sales, and violent victimization. Crime & Delinquency, 54, 153–172.
Densley, J. (2011). Ganging up on gangs: Why the gang intervention industry needs an intervention. The British Journal of Forensic Practice, 13, 12–23.
Densley, J. (2012). The organization of London’s street gangs. Global Crime, 13, 42–64.
Densley, J. (2013). How gangs work. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Densley, J. (2014). It’s gang life, but not as we know it: The evolution of gang business. Crime & Delinquency, 60, 517–546.
Densley, J., McLean, R., Deuchar, R., & Harding, S. (2018). An altered state? Emergent changes to illicit drug markets and distribution networks in Scotland. International Journal of Drug Policy, 58, 113–120.
Deuchar, R. (2009). Gangs, marginalised youth and social capital. Stoke on Trent: Trentham.
Disley, E., & Liddle, M. (2016). Local Perspectives in Ending Gang and Youth Violence areas. London: Home Office.
Fraser, A. (2015). Urban legends. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldstein, P. (1985). The drug/violence nexus: A tripartite conceptual framework. Journal of Drug Issues, 14, 493–506.
Gottschalk, P. (2017). Maturity levels for Outlaw Groups: The case of criminal street gangs. Deviant Behavior, 38, 1267–1278.
Gunter, A. (2017). Race, gangs and youth violence. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Hales, G., Lewis, C., & Silverstone, D. (2006). Gun crime: The market in and use of illegal firearms, home office research study 298. London: Home Office.
Hallsworth, S. (2013). The Gang and beyond. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hallsworth, S., & Young, T. (2008). Gang talk and gang talkers: A critique. Crime, Media, Culture, 4, 175–195.
Harding, S. (2014). The street casino. Bristol: Policy Press.
Irwin-Rogers, K., Densley, J., & Pinkney, C. (2018). Gang violence and social media. In J. Ireland, P. Birch, & C. Ireland (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of human aggression (pp. 400–410). Abingdon: Routledge.
Klein, M. (2001). Resolving the Eurogang paradox. In M. W. Klein, H.-J. Kerner, C. L. Maxson, & E. G. M. Weitekamp (Eds.), The Eurogang paradox (pp. 7–20). Norwell: Kluwer.
Klein, M., & Maxson, C. (2006). Street gang patterns and policies. New York: Oxford University Press.
Levitt, S., & Venkatesh, S. (2000). An economic analysis of a drug–selling gang’s finances. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 755–789.
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage.
McLean, R. (2018). An evolving gang model in contemporary Scotland. Deviant Behavior, 39, 309–321.
McLean, R., Densley, J., & Deuchar, R. (2018a). Situating gangs within Scotland’s illegal drugs market(s). Trends in Organized Crime, 21, 147–171.
McLean, R., Deuchar, R., Harding, S., & Densley, J. (2018b). Putting the ‘street’ in gang: Place and space in the organization of Scotland’s drug selling gangs. The British Journal of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azy015.
NCA. (2016). County lines: Gang violence, exploitation and drug supply 2016. London: National Crime Agency.
Papachristos, A., Hureau, H., & Braga, A. (2013). The Corner and The Crew: The Influence of Geography and Social Networks on Gang Violence. American Sociological Review, 78, 417–447.
Patrick, J. (1973). A Glasgow gang observed. London: Methuen.
Pearson, G. (2006). Disturbing continuities: ‘Peaky Blinders’ to ‘Hoodies’. Criminal Justice Matters, 65, 6–7.
Pearson, G. (2011). Perpetual novelty: Youth, modernity and historical amnesia. In B. Goldson (Ed.), Youth in crisis? (pp. 128–144). London: Routledge.
Pitts, J. (2007). Reluctant gangsters: Youth gangs in Waltham Forest. Retrieved from http://static.walthamforest.gov.uk/sp/documents/reluctant-gangsters.pdf
Pitts, J. (2008). Reluctant gangsters. Cullompton: Willan.
Pitts, J. (2012). Reluctant Criminologists: Criminology, ideology and the violent youth gang. Youth and Policy, 109, 27–45.
Pitts, J. (2016) Critical Realism and Gang Violence. In: Matthews R. (eds) What is to Be Done About Crime and Punishment?. Palgrave Macmillan, London
Pyrooz, D. C., & Mitchell, M. (2015). Little gang and big gang research. In S. H. Decker & D. C. Pyrooz (Eds.), The Handbook of Gangs (pp. 28–58). Hoboken: Wiley.
Ralphs, R., Medina, J., & Aldridge, J. (2009). Who needs enemies with friends like these? The importance of place for young people living in known gang areas. Journal of Youth Studies, 12, 483–500.
Reuter, P. (2009). Systemic violence in drug markets. Crime, Law and Social Change, 52, 275–284.
Robinson, G., McLean, R., & Densley, J. (2018). Working county lines: child criminal exploitation and illicit drug dealing in Glasgow and Merseyside. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X18806742.
Shute, J., & Medina, J. (2014). Hunting Gruffalo: ‘Gangs,’ unreason and the big, bad coalition. Criminal Justice Matters, 96, 26–27.
Smithson, H., & Ralphs, R. (2016). Youth in the UK: 99 problems but the gang ain’t one? Safer Communities, 15, 11–23.
Smithson, H., Ralphs, R., & Williams, P. (2012). Used and abused: The problematic usage of gang terminology in the United Kingdom and its implications for ethnic minority youth. The British Journal of Criminology, 53, 113–128.
Storrod, M., & Densley, J. (2017). ‘Going viral’ and ‘Going country’: The expressive and instrumental activities of street gangs on social media. Journal of Youth Studies, 20, 677–696.
Suttles, G. (1968). The social order of the slum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Thrasher, F. (1927). The gang. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Van Hellemont, E., & Densley, J. (2018). Gang glocalization: How a global mediascape creates and shapes local gang realities. Crime, Media, Culture. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659018760107.
Vigil, D. (2002). A rainbow of gangs. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Von Lampe, K. (2016). Organized crime. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Weisel, D. (2002). The evolution of street gangs: An examination of form and variation. In W. Reed & S. Decker (Eds.), Responding to gangs (pp. 25–65). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
Whittaker, A., Cheston, L., Tyrell, T., Higgins, M., Felix-Baptiste, C., & Havard, T. (2018). From Postcodes to Profits: Changes in gang activity in Waltham Forest. London: LSBU. https://doi.org/10.18744/PUB.002234.
Williamson, G. R., & Whittaker, A. (2017). Succeeding in literature reviews and research project plans for nursing students (3rd edn.). London: Sage Publications.
Williams, P. (2015). Criminalising the Other: Challenging the race-gang nexus. Race & Class, 56, 18–35.
Windle, J., & Briggs, D. (2015a). Going solo: The social organisation of drug dealing within a London street gang. Journal of Youth Studies, 18, 1170–1185.
Windle, J., & Briggs, D. (2015b). It’s like working away for two weeks: The harms associated with young drug dealers commuting from a saturated London drug market. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 17, 105–119.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Whittaker, A., Densley, J., Cheston, L. et al. Reluctant Gangsters Revisited: The Evolution of Gangs from Postcodes to Profits. Eur J Crim Policy Res 26, 1–22 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-019-09408-4
- Gang evolution
- County lines