Advertisement

Risk terrain modeling for road safety: identifying crash-related environmental factors in the province of Cádiz, Spain

  • Alejandro Giménez-Santana
  • José E. Medina-Sarmiento
  • Fernando Miró-Llinares
Article

Abstract

Environmental Criminology has developed a robust framework that provides the scientific support and necessary foundation for crime analysis through crime mapping. This theoretical approach focuses on the situational and temporal characteristics of criminal opportunity rather than on the offender’s behavior for crime prevention. In the scope of road safety and traffic crashes, few studies have adopted this approach. This study used risk terrain modeling (RTM), developed by the Rutgers Center on Public Security, to determine the relative importance of varying environmental risk factors on alcohol-related crashes and traffic accidents. The independent variables consisted of a set of potential environmental risk factors, while the dependent variable comprised all DWI crashes and traffic accidents in the province of Cádiz in 2012. According to the results of the current study, restaurant locations are spatially associated with the occurrence of drunk driving crashes, while proximity restaurants and recreational lodging centers correlate with the sites of traffic accidents.

Keywords

Risk terrain modeling Environmental criminology Road safety 

Notes

Funding

The current study was part of the I + D + i project entitled “(MapVial) Environmental Criminology, police intervention and decision making for the prevention of under the influence driving and car accidents. Analysis of a province”, with reference SPIP2015-01691, funded by the Dirección General de Tráfico (DGT).

References

  1. Abdel-Aty, M. A., & Radwan, A. E. (2000). Modeling traffic accident occurrence and involvement. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 32(5), 633–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Affum, J. K., & Taylor, M. A. (1998). Selatm—a GIS based program for evaluating the safety benefits of local area traffic management schemes. Transportation Planning and Technology, 21(1-2), 93–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, T. K. (2009). Kernel density estimation and K-means clustering to profile road accident hotspots. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 41(3), 359–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Black, R. (1991). Refugees and displaced persons: geographical perspectives and research directions. Progress in Human Geography, 15(3), 281–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. L. (1993). Environment, routine and situation: toward a pattern theory of crime. Advances in Criminological Theory, 5(2), 259–294.Google Scholar
  6. Brantingham, P., & Brantingham, P. (1995). Criminality of place. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 3(3), 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brantingham, P. J., & Tita, G. (2008). Offender mobility and crime pattern formation from first principles. In L. Liu & J. Eck (Eds.), Artificial crime analysis systems: Using computer simulations and geographic information systems (pp. 193–208). Hershey: Idea Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caetano, R., & Clark, C. L. (2000). Hispanics, blacks and whites driving under the influence of alcohol: results from the 1995 national alcohol survey. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 32(1), 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Camacho-Collados, M., & Liberatore, F. (2015). A decision support system for predictive police patrolling. Decision Support Systems, 75, 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caplan, J. M. (2011). Mapping the spatial influence of crime correlates: a comparison of operationalization schemes and implications for crime analysis and criminal justice practice. Cityscape, 13, 57–83.Google Scholar
  11. Caplan, J. M., & Kennedy, L. W. (2010). Risk terrain modeling manual: Theoretical framework and technical steps of spatial risk assessment for crime analysis. Newark: Rutgers Center on Public Security.Google Scholar
  12. Caplan, J. M., & Kennedy, L. W. (2016). Risk terrain modeling: Crime prediction and risk reduction. Oakland: Univ of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Caplan, J. M., Kennedy, L. W., & Miller, J. (2011). Risk terrain modeling: brokering criminological theory and GIS methods for crime forecasting. Justice Quarterly, 28(2), 360–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caplan, J. M., Kennedy, L., & Piza, E. (2013). Risk terrain modeling diagnostics user manual (version 1.0). Newark: Rutgers Center on Public Security.Google Scholar
  15. Chainey, S., Tompson, L., & Uhlig, S. (2008). The utility of hotspot mapping for predicting spatial patterns of crime. Security Journal, 21(1-2), 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chang, I., Lapham, S. C., & Barton, K. J. (1996). Drinking environment and sociodemographic factors among DWI offenders. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 57(6), 659–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cohen, L., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (Eds.). (1986). The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Daley, D., Bachmann, M., Bachmann, B. A., Pedigo, C., Bui, M. T., & Coffman, J. (2016). Risk terrain modeling predicts child maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 62, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dirección General de Tráfico. (2015). Anuario estadístico. Ministerio del Interior.Google Scholar
  21. Drawve, G. (2016). A metric comparison of predictive hot spot techniques and RTM. Justice Quarterly, 33(3), 369–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Drawve, G., Belongie, M., & Steinman, H. (2017). The role of crime analyst and researcher partnerships: a training exercise in Green Bay, Wisconsin. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 12, 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dugato, M. (2013). Assessing the validity of risk terrain modeling in a European city: preventing robberies in the city of Milan. Crime Mapping, 5(1), 63–89.Google Scholar
  24. Dugato, M., Calderoni, F., & Berlusconi, G. (2017). Forecasting organized crime homicides: risk terrain modeling of camorra violence in Naples, Italy. Journal of Interpersonal Violence.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517712275.
  25. Elvik, R. (2001). Cost-benefit analysis of police enforcement. Report ESCAPE Project. Working Paper. Helsinki: VTT.Google Scholar
  26. Erdogan, S., Yilmaz, I., Baybura, T., & Gullu, M. (2008). Geographical information systems aided traffic accident analysis system case study: city of Afyonkarahisar. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40(1), 174–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Erke, A., Goldenbeld, C., & Vaa, T. (2009). Good practice in the selected key areas: Speeding, drink driving and seat belt wearing. Results from meta-analysis. Police Enforcement Policy and Programmes on European Roads (PEPPER), Deliverable, 9.Google Scholar
  28. Ewing, R., & Dumbaugh, E. (2009). The built environment and traffic safety: a review of empirical evidence. CPL Bibliography, 23(4), 347–367.Google Scholar
  29. Famega, C. N. (2005). Variation in officer downtime: a review of the research. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 28(3), 388–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fell, J. C., Waehrer, G., Voas, R. B., Auld-Owens, A., Carr, K., & Pell, K. (2014). Effects of enforcement intensity on alcohol impaired driving crashes. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 73, 181–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fundación Ideas para la Paz. (2015). Atlas Microtráfico y Comercialización de Sustancias Psicoativas en Pequeñas Cantidades.Google Scholar
  32. Gerell, M. (2018). Bus stops and violence, are risky places really risky? European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 1–21.Google Scholar
  33. Giménez-Santana, A., Caplan, J. M., & Drawve, G. (2018). Risk terrain modeling and socio-economic stratification: identifying risky places for violent crime victimization in Bogotá, Colombia. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 1–15.Google Scholar
  34. Gruenewald, P. J., & Johnson, F. W. (2010). Drinking, driving, and crashing: a traffic-flow model of alcohol-related motor vehicle accidents. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 71(2), 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harirforoush, H., & Bellalite, L. (2016). A new integrated GIS-based analysis to detect hotspots: a case study of the city of Sherbrooke. Accident Analysis and Prevention.Google Scholar
  36. Instituto de Estadística y Cartografía de Analucía. (2015). Microdatos. Retrieved from: https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/institutodeestadisticaycartografia.
  37. Kennedy, L. W., & Caplan, J. M. (2012). A theory of risky places. Research brief. Newark: Rutgers Center on Public Security.Google Scholar
  38. Kennedy, L. W., & Van Brunschot, E. G. (2009). The risk in crime. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  39. Kennedy, L. W., Caplan, J. M., Piza, E. L., & Buccine-Schraeder, H. (2015). Vulnerability and exposure to crime: applying risk terrain modeling to the study of assault in Chicago. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 1–20.Google Scholar
  40. Lang, E., & Stockwell, T. (1991). Drinking locations of drink-drivers: a comparative analysis of accident and nonaccident cases. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 23(6), 573–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Levine, N. (2017). The location of late night bars and alcohol-related crashes in Houston, Texas. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 107, 152–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Livingston, M., Chikritzhs, T., & Room, R. (2007). Changing the density of alcohol outlets to reduce alcohol-related problems. Drug and Alcohol Review, 26(5), 557–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lucy, W. H. (2003). Mortality risk associated with leaving home: recognizing the relevance of the built environment. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 1564–1569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mammadrahimli, A. (2015). Assessment of crash location improvements in map-based geocoding systems and subsequent benefits to geospatial crash analysis. Doctoral dissertation, Clemson University.Google Scholar
  45. Martin, J. L. (2002). Relationship between crash rate and hourly traffic flow on interurban motorways. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 34(5), 619–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Medina-Sarmiento, J. E. (2014). Felson, Marcus. In J. M. Miller (Ed.), The encyclopedia of theoretical criminology (Vol. 1). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  47. Medina-Sarmiento, J. E. (2015). Actividades cotidianas y seguridad vial. Una evaluación del «guardián capaz» en la prevención de la conducción influenciada por bebidas alcohólicas. In F. Miró Llinares, A. Sanllehí, R. José, J. E. Medina Sarmiento, & L. Summers (Eds.), Crimen, oportunidad y vida diaria. Libro homenaje al Profesor Dr. Marcus Felson. Librería-Editorial Dykinson.Google Scholar
  48. Miró, F., & Bautista, R. (2013). ¿Por qué cumplimos las normas penales? Sobre la disuasión en materia de seguridad vial. InDret, (4).Google Scholar
  49. Miró-Llinares, F., & Medina-Sarmiento, J. E. (2015). Sobre la evolución y el impacto en el pensamiento criminológico de Marcus Felson y la Teoría de las Actividades Cotidianas. In F. Miró Llinares, A. Sanllehí, R. José, J. E. Medina Sarmiento, & L. Summers (Eds.), Crimen, oportunidad y vida diaria. Libro homenaje al Profesor Dr. Marcus Felson. Librería-Editorial Dykinson.Google Scholar
  50. Moeinaddini, M., Asadi-Shekari, Z., & Shah, M. Z. (2014). The relationship between urban street networks and the number of transport fatalities at the city level. Safety Science, 62, 114–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Moreto, W., & Caplan, J. M. (2010). Forecasting global maritime piracy utilizing the risk terrain modeling (rtm) approach. Newark: Rutgers center on public security brief.Google Scholar
  52. Morrison, L., Begg, D. J., & Langley, J. D. (2002). Personal and situational influences on drink driving and sober driving among a cohort of young adults. Injury Prevention, 8(2), 111–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Morrison, C., Ponicki, W. R., Gruenewald, P. J., Wiebe, D. J., & Smith, K. (2016). Spatial relationships between alcohol-related road crashes and retail alcohol availability. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 162, 241–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mustaine, E. E., & Tewksbury, R. (1999). Assessing the likelihood of drunk driving: gender, context and lifestyle. Journal of Crime and Justice, 22(1), 57–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2014). Data-driven approaches to crime and traffic safety (DDACTS). Operational Guidelines.Google Scholar
  56. O’Donnell, M. A. (1985). Research on drinking locations of alcohol-impaired drivers: implications for prevention policies. Journal of Public Health Policy, 6(4), 510–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ohyama, T., & Amemiya, M. (2018). Applying crime prediction techniques to Japan: a comparison between risk terrain modeling and other methods. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 1–19.Google Scholar
  58. Openshaw, S. (1984). The modifiable areal unit problem. In Concepts and techniques in modern geography 38. Norwich: Geo Books.Google Scholar
  59. Peltzer, K. (2011). Road use behavior in sub-Saharan Africa. In B. Porter (Ed.), Handbook of traffic psychology (pp. 503–518). Amsterdam: ElsevierCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Piza, E., Feng, S., Kennedy, L., & Caplan, J. (2017). Place-based correlates of motor vehicle theft and recovery: measuring spatial influence across neighbourhood context. Urban Studies, 54(13), 2998–3021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ponicki, W. R., Gruenewald, P. J., & Remer, L. G. (2013). Spatial panel analyses of alcohol outlets and motor vehicle crashes in California: 1999-2008. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 55, 135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Prasannakumar, V., Vijith, H., Charutha, R., & Geetha, N. (2011). Spatio-temporal clustering of road accidents: GIS based analysis and assessment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 21, 317–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Qin, X., Ivan, J. N., & Ravishanker, N. (2004). Selecting exposure measures in crash rate prediction for two-lane highway segments. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 36(2), 183–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ratcliffe, J. H. (2016). Intelligence-led policing. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sabel, C. E., Kingham, S., Nicholson, A., & Bartie, P. (2005). Road traffic accident simulation modelling-a kernel estimation approach. In The 17th annual colloquium of the spatial information research Centre University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand (pp. 67–75).Google Scholar
  66. Sánchez Ferreira, E. (2012). Hacia un análisis sociológico de la siniestrabilidad vial. Aposta. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 52, 6–18.Google Scholar
  67. Sherman, L. W., Gartin, P. R., & Buerger, M. E. (1989). Hot spots of predatory crime: routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology, 27(1), 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Slagle, B. A. (2014). Drinking and driving: A pilot study of subjective norms, attitudes and behaviors of German and American students. Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
  69. Steenberghen, T., Dufays, T., Thomas, I., & Flahaut, B. (2004). Intra-urban location and clustering of road accidents using GIS: a Belgian example. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 18(2), 169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Stitt, B. G., & Giacopassi, D. J. (1992). Alcohol availability and alcohol-related crime. Criminal Justice Review, 17(2), 268–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Thomas, I. (1996). Spatial data aggregation: exploratory analysis of road accidents. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 28(2), 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Turrisi, R., & Jaccard, J. (1992). Cognitive and attitudinal factors in the analysis of alternatives to drunk driving. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 53(5), 405–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Usdan, S. L., Moore, C. G., Schumacher, J. E., & Talbott, L. L. (2005). Drinking locations prior to impaired driving among college students: implications for prevention. Journal of American College Health, 54(2), 69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Vemulapalli, S. S., Ulak, M. B., Ozguven, E. E., Sando, T., Horner, M. W., Abdelrazig, Y., & Moses, R. (2016). GIS-based spatial and temporal analysis of aging-involved accidents: a case study of three counties in Florida. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 1–27.Google Scholar
  75. Watts, R. K., & Rabow, J. (1983). Alcohol availability and alcohol-related problems in 213 California cities. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 7(1), 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wechsler, H., Lee, J. E., Nelson, T. F., & Lee, H. (2003). Drinking and driving among college students: the influence of alcohol-control policies. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 25(3), 212–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wegman, F., Commandeur, J., Doveh, E., Eksler, V., Gitelman, V., Hakkert, S., & Oppe, S. (2008). SUNflowerNext: towards a composite road safety performance index. Deliverable, D6, 16.Google Scholar
  78. Weisburd, D. (2015). The law of crime concentration and the criminology of place. Criminology, 53(2), 133–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Weisburd, D., & Lum, C. (2005). The diffusion of computerized crime mapping in policing: linking research and practice. Police Practice and Research, 6(5), 419–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Weiss, M. W. (2016). Traffic enforcement, policing, and crime rates.Google Scholar
  81. WHO. (2015). Global status report on road safety 2015. World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rutgers Center on Public SecurityRutgers UniversityNewarkUSA
  2. 2.Centro Crímina para el Estudio y Prevención de la DelincuenciaUniversidad Miguel Hernández de ElcheAlicanteSpain

Personalised recommendations