Digital Uses, Victimization and Online Aggression: A Comparative Study Between Primary School and Lower Secondary School Students in France



With the growing use of electronic communication among children and adolescents, the Internet has become an important tool for their socialization and has opened up new perspectives for network and community building opportunities. However, the Internet and electronic communication tools can be used either positively or negatively and the spread of its use in these recent years has led to online risky behaviours and harm. This questionnaire survey was completed in five primary schools and seven lower secondary schools in the South of France. It sets out to assess the digital uses, risk taking and negative experiences online among primary and secondary school students in France (N = 4200). Findings show that primary school students are pretty well involved in digital communication since they spend an average of 150 min per day online vs. 190 for secondary school participants. Social networking is also part of their lives with 17 % of primary school children and 50 % secondary school students who use Facebook. In terms of risk taking, only 49 % of primary students and 39 % of secondary school students report they personally know all their online friends. Cyberbullying figures show that quite a few respondents have been affected with negative experiences among which some were repeatedly victimized (14 % in primary schools and 5 % in secondary schools). These findings highlight the necessity to take the issue of educating towards a positive and safe use of the Internet seriously and that primary school children also need to be provided with proper guidance towards a safer Internet.


Cyberbullying Perpetration Primary and secondary schools Risks Victimization 



This publication and the study presented has been produced with the financial support of the DAPHNE programme of the European Union. European Daphne III Program (Project JUST/2011/DAP/AG/3259) Tabby in Internet. Threat Assessment of Bullying Behaviour among youngsters. Tranferring Internet Preventive procedures in Europe. The contents of this article are the sole responsibility of the authors of the article and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Commission. No conflict of interest is present.


  1. Beran, T., & Li, Q. (2007). The relationship between cyberbullying and school bullying. Journal of Student Wellbeing, 1(2), 15–33.Google Scholar
  2. Blaya, C. (2013). Les ados dans le cyberespace. Prises de risque et cyberviolence. Bruxelles: De Boeck.Google Scholar
  3. Blaya, C. & Alava, S. (2012). Risques et sécurité des enfants sur Internet: rapport pour la France - résultats de l’enquête EU Kids Online menée auprès des 9-16 ans et de leurs parents en France. EU Kids Online, London chool of Economics & Political Science, London, UK.
  4. Calvete, E., Orue, I., Estévez, A., Villardón, L., & Padilla, P. (2010). Cyberbullying in adolescents: modalities and aggressors’ profile. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1128–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, M. A., Slee, P. T., Spears, B. A., Butler, D., & Kift, S. (2013). Docyberbullies suffer too? Cyberbullies’ perceptions of the harm they cause to others and to their own mental health. School Psychology International, 34, 613–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Card, N. (2013). Definitions: Another perspective and a proposal for beginning with cyberaggression. In S. Bauman, D. Cross, & J. Walker (Eds.), Principles of cyberbullying research (pp. 41–45). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Debarbieux, E. (2006). Violences à l’école: Un défi mondial? Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  8. DePaolis, K., Williford, A. (2014). The Nature and Prevalence of Cyber Victimization Among Elementary School Children. Child Youth Care Forum.Google Scholar
  9. Garcia-Guilabert, N. (2014). Victimizacion de los menores por actos de ciberacoso continuado y actividades cotidianas en el ciberespacio. Tesis doctoral en ciencias sociales. Escuela Internacional de Doctorado. Universidad de Murcia.Google Scholar
  10. Hemphill, S. A., Kotevski, A., Tollit, M., Smith, R., Herrenkohl, T. I., Toumbourou, J. W., et al. (2012). Longitudinal predictors of cyber and traditional bullying perpetration in Australian secondary school students. Journal of Adolescent Health. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.11.019.Google Scholar
  11. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2009). Bullying beyond the schoolyard: Preventing and responding to cyberbullying. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Holloway, D., Green, L., & Livingstone, S. (2014). Zero to eight. Young children and their Internet use, LSE. London: EU Kids Online.Google Scholar
  13. Juvonen, J., & Gross, F. (2008). Extending the school grounds? Bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health, 78(9), 496–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Keith, S., & Martin, M. (2004). Cyberbullying: creating a culture of respect in a cyber world. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 13(4), 224–228.Google Scholar
  15. Kredens, E., Fontar, B. (2010). Comprendre le comportement des enfants et adolescents sur Internet pour les protéger des dangers. Rapport pour Fréquences Ecole pour l’Education aux Médias. Fondation pour l’Enfance.Google Scholar
  16. Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Smith, A., Purcell, K., Zickuhr, K., & Rainie, L. (2011). Teens, kindness and cruelty on socialnetwork sites. Retrieved from
  17. Li, Q. (2005). Cyberbullying in Schools: Nature and Extent of Canadian Adolescents’ Experience. Online Submission, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Montreal, Canada, Apr 2005). Consulté sur ERIC database, 03/2011.Google Scholar
  18. Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., & Ólafsson, K. (2011). Risks and safety on the internet: The perspective of European children. London: Full findings, LSE. EU Kids Online.Google Scholar
  19. Mascheroni, G., & Cuman, A. (2014). Net children go mobile: Final report. Deliverables D6.4 & D.5.2. Milano: Educatt.Google Scholar
  20. Mascheroni, G., & Olafsson, K. (2014). Net children go mobile: The UK report: Risks and opportunities (2nd edn.). Milan: Educatt.Google Scholar
  21. McLoughlin, C., Meyricke, R. & Burgess, J. (2009). Bullies in Cyberspace: How rural, and regional Australian youth perceive the problem of cyberbullying and its impact. Communication présentée à l’International Symposium for Innovation in Rural Éducation (ISFIRE), Armidale (Australia). Retrieved from
  22. Menesini, E., Innocenti, A., Palladino, B., Scheithauer, H., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Frisen, A., Berne, S., Naruskov, K., Ortega, R., Calmaestra, J., Blaya, C., & Berthaud, J. (2012). Cyberbullying definition among adolescents: a comparison across six European countries. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(9), 455–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Monks, C. P., Robinson, S., & Worlidge, P. (2012). The emergence of cyberbullying: a survey of primary school pupil’s perceptions and experiences. School Psychology International, 33, 477–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ofcom. (2013). Children and parents: Media use and attitudes report. London: Office of Communications.Google Scholar
  25. Ofcom (2014). The Communications market 2014. Retrieved from
  26. Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2012). Cyberbullying prevention and response, expert perspectives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Sengupta, A., & Chaudhuri, A. (2011). Are social networking sites a source of online harassment for teens? Evidence from survey data. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(2), 284–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Simon, F., & Duhautois, S. (2011). Les adolescents, le téléphone et l’Internet mobile: sondage action innocence, UNAF, TNS SOFRES. (Accédé en ligne le 15 novembre 2012).
  29. Smith, P. K. (2011). Bullying in schools: Thirty years of research. In C. Monks & I. Coyne (Eds.), Bullying in different contexts (pp. 36–60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511921018.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith, P., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith, P. K., Steffgen, G., & Sittichai, R. (2013). The nature of cyberbullying, and an international network. In P. K. Smith & G. Steffgen (Eds.), Cyberbullying through the new media: Findings from an international network (pp. 3–19). Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  32. Thornberg, R. (2011). She’s weird!” – The social construction of bullying in school: a review of qualitative research. Children & Society, 25, 258–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: a critical review and synthesis of research on cyber bullying victimization. Computers in Human Behaviour, 26, 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Völlink, T., Bolman, C., Dehue, F., & Jacobs, N. (2013). Coping with cyberbullying: differences between victims, bully-victims and children not involved in bullying. Journal of Community and Applied SocialPsychology, 23, 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Willard, N. (2003). Off-campus, harmful online student speech. Journal of School Violence, 1(2), 65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Willard, N. (2007). Educator’s guide to cyberbullying cyberthreats and sexting. Retrieved from
  37. Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2004). Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: a comparison of associated youth characteristics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(7), 1308–1316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2008). Prevalence & frequency of internet harassment instigation: implications or adolescent health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(2), 189–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ybarra, M. L., Diener-West, M., & Leaf, P. (2007). Examining the overlap in internet harassment and school bullying: implications for school intervention. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Observatory of Violence in SchoolsURMIS- Université Nice Sophia AntipolisNiceFrance
  2. 2.International Observatory of Violence in SchoolsBCL-Université Nice Sophia AntipolisNiceFrance

Personalised recommendations