Skip to main content
Log in

Examining Intolerance of Uncertainty as a System of Interacting Beliefs: A Network Analysis Among 108,540 Adolescents

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

While intolerance of uncertainty (IU) is widely recognized as a transdiagnostic risk factor for psychopathology, there is limited research on its internal structure and core features. This study aimed to employ network analysis to examine IU as a system of interconnected beliefs among a large sample of Chinese adolescents.

Methods

A total of 108,540 students participated in this study by providing data through an online platform. IU was measured using the RCIUI-A-C, a customized assessment specifically developed and validated for Chinese adolescents. This assessment focused on individuals’ beliefs regarding the general unacceptability of uncertainty.

Results

The beliefs “can’t stand being in an uncertain situation” and “can’t stand waiting when I don’t know what’s going to happen” were identified as the most central beliefs within the IU network. Additionally, the weighted adjacency matrix revealed that the beliefs “can’t stand being in an uncertain situation” and “can’t stand not knowing certain things in life in advance” exhibited the strongest connection. Moreover, two distinct communities were identified within the IU network: “intolerance of uncertainty and of uncertain situations” and “intolerance of the unexpected and difficulty waiting in an uncertain situation”. Notably, one of the most central beliefs served as the strongest bridge between these two communities.

Conclusions

These findings offer novel insights into the internal characteristics of IU and contribute to a better understanding of its nature and malleability. The identification of the two most central beliefs and the bridging beliefs suggests that they may serve as effective targets for IU-based interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author (FF) on reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors want to express their sincere gratitude to all participants for participating in the study.

Funding

The present study was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31871129, 32271135).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors participated in the data collecting and provided advice on interpretation of the data. Author Haoxian Ye undertook the statistical analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Authors Jiaming Ding, Yixin Liu, Zifan Cai, Nan Jiang, and Tengfei Cheng finished the table and figure. Authors Sisi He, Ruiyan You, Wanqing Yu, Wenxu Liu and Luowei Bu modified the manuscript. Author Fang Fan designed the study and wrote the protocol. All authors contributed to and have approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fang Fan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

This study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of South China Normal University (SCNU-PSY-2021-094). The survey was under the principle of voluntary participation.

Informed Consent

The participants and their guardians carefully read, signed and returned the informed consent form to the researcher.

Animal Rights

No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ye, H., Ding, J., Liu, Y. et al. Examining Intolerance of Uncertainty as a System of Interacting Beliefs: A Network Analysis Among 108,540 Adolescents. Cogn Ther Res (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-023-10436-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-023-10436-y

Keywords

Navigation