Skip to main content

Defining and Measuring Tolerance of Uncontrollability

Abstract

Background

Life is filled with situations that remain completely beyond our control. Yet, some people seem better able to tolerate this uncontrollability than others. To date, little research has focused on understanding how people feel about the uncontrollability of life (i.e., tolerance of uncontrollability).

Methods

This article introduces and describes tolerance of uncontrollability while distinguishing it from other related constructs, including intolerance of uncertainty, perception and level of control, learned helplessness, and global beliefs, such as religion and spirituality, optimism and pessimism, mindfulness, and distress tolerance. To measure an individual’s tolerance of uncontrollability, we developed the Tolerance of Uncontrollability Questionnaire (TOUQ) and administered it, together with other measures on possibly related constructs, to 300 individuals (data were analyzed from 226 participants).

Results

After running exploratory factor analysis, the final version of the TOUQ consists of 19 items that load onto one factor, with excellent internal consistency (α = 0.97). Scores on the TOUQ were moderately related to intolerance of uncertainty and optimism, and weakly related to specific mindfulness factors.

Conclusions

The TOUQ measures a unique construct and shows evidence of reliability and validity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Amadi, K. U., Uwakwe, R., Odinka, P. C., Ndukuba, A. C., Muomah, C. R., & Ohaeri, J. U. (2016). Religion, coping and outcome in our-patients with depression or diabetes mellitus. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 133, 489–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.12537

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Andersson, G. (1996). The benefits of optimism: A meta-analytic review of the Life Orientation Test. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 719–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(96)00118-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anestis, M. D., Selby, E. A., Fink, E. L., & Joiner, T. E. (2007). The multifaceted role of distress tolerance in dysregulated eating behaviors. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40, 718–726. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baer, R. A., Carmody, J., & Hunsinger, M. (2012). Weekly change in mindfulness and perceived stress in a mindfulness-based stress reduction program. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68, 755–765. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.21865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13, 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191105283504

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Benson, J. S., & Kennelly, K. J. (1976). Learned helplessness: The result of uncontrollable reinforcements or uncontrollable aversive stimuli? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.34.1.138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bernstein, A., Marshall, E. C., & Zvolensky, M. J. (2011). Multi-method evaluation of distress tolerance measures and construct (s): Concurrent relations to mood and anxiety psychopathology and quality of life. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 2, 386–399. https://doi.org/10.5127/jep.006610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bernstein, A., Zvolensky, M. J., Vujanovic, A. A., & Moos, R. (2009). Anxiety sensitivity, distress tolerance, and discomfort intolerance: A hierarchical model of affect sensitivity and Tolerance. Behavior Therapy, 40, 291–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2008.08.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Birrell, J., Meares, K., Wilkinson, A., & Freeston, M. (2011). Toward a definition of intolerance of uncertainty: A review of factor analytical studies of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 1198–1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.07.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practiced for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). Guilford Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brown, K. W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: Theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 211–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400701598298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Buhr, K., & Dugas, M. J. (2006). Investigating the construct validity of intolerance of uncertainty and its unique relationship with worry. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 20, 222–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2004.12.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Carleton, R. N., Mulvogue, M. K., Thibodeau, M. A., McCabe, R. E., Antony, M. M., & Asmundson, G. J. (2012). Increasingly certain about uncertainty: Intolerance of uncertainty across anxiety and depression. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 26, 468–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2012.01.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Carleton, R. N., Norton, M. A., & Asmundson, G. J. G. (2007). Fearing the unknown: A short version of the intolerance of uncertainty scale. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 21, 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.03.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cherlin, A., & Bourque, L. (1974). Dimensionality and reliability of the rotter I-E scale. Sociometry, 37, 565–582. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chorpita, B. F., & Barlow, D. H. (1998). The development of anxiety: The role of control in the early environment. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.3

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chorpita, B. F., Brown, T. A., & Barlow, D. H. (1998). Perceived control as a mediator of family environment in etiological models of childhood anxiety. Behavior Therapy, 29, 457–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(98)80043-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment & Evaluation, 10, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995627.d8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cumming, G. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25, 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613504966

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cunningham, A. J., Lockwood, G. A., & Cunningham, J. A. (1991). A relationship between perceived self-efficacy and quality of life in cancer patients. Patient Education and Counseling, 17, 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0738-3991(91)90052-7

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Drake, L., Duncan, E., Sutherland, F., Abernethy, C., & Henry, C. (2008). Time perspective and correlates of wellbeing. Time & Society, 17, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X07086304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dugas, M. J., Gosselin, P., & Ladouceur, R. (2001). Intolerance of uncertainty and worry: Investigating specificity in a nonclinical sample. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 25, 551–558. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005553414688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Franklin, B. (1907). The writings of Benjamin Franklin 10 volumes. The Macmillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Freeston, M. H., Rhéaume, J., Letarte, H., Dugas, M. J., & Ladouceur, R. (1994). Why do people worry? Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 791–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)90048-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gartner, J. (1996). Religious commitment, mental health, and pro-social behavior: A review of the empirical literature. In E. P. Shafranske (Ed.), Religion and the clinical practice of psychology (pp. 187–214). American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Havranek, M. M., Bolliger, B., Roos, S., Pryce, C. R., Quednow, B. B., & Seifritz, E. (2016). Uncontrollable and unpredictable stress interacts with subclinical depression and anxiety scores in determining anxiety response. Stress, 19, 53–52. https://doi.org/10.3109/10253890.2015.1117449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hayes, S. C., Bissett, R. T., Korn, Z., Zettle, R. D., Rosenfarb, I. S., Cooper, L. D., & Grundt, A. M. (1999). The impact of acceptance versus control rationales on pain tolerance. The Psychological Record, 49, 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hofmann, S. G. (2005). Perception of control over anxiety mediates the relation between catastrophic thinking and social anxiety in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 885–895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2004.07.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hofmann, S. G., Sawyer, A. T., Witt, A. A., & Oh, D. (2010). The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on anxiety and depression: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology., 78, 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018555

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Klonowicz, T. (2001). Discontented people: Reactivity and locus of control as determinants of subjective well-being. European Journal of Personality, 15, 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kocovski, N. L., Segal, Z. V., Battista, S. R., & Didonna, F. (2009). Mindfulness and psychopathology: Problem formulation. In F. Didonna (Ed.), Clinical handbook of mindfulness (pp. 85–98). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Koenig, H. G., & Büssing, A. (2010). The Duke University Religion Index (DUREL): A five-item measure for use in epidemiological studies. Religions, 1, 78–85. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel1010078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Larson, D. B., Sherrill, K. A., Lyons, J. S., Craigie, F. C., Thielman, S. B., Greenwold, M. A., & Larson, S. S. (1992). Associations between dimensions of religious commitment and mental health reported in the American Journal of Psychiatry and Archives of General Psychiatry: 1978–1989. American Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 557–559. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.149.4.557

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Leotti, L. A., Iyengar, S. S., & Ochsner, K. N. (2010). Born to choose: The origins and value of the need for control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 457–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.08.001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Leyro, T. M., Zvolensky, M. J., & Bernstein, A. (2010). Distress tolerance and psychopathological symptoms and disorders: A review of the empirical literature among adults. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 576. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019712

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Linehan, M. M. (1993). Diagnosis and treatment of mental disorders. Skills training manual for treating borderline personality disorder. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.

  40. Maier, S. F., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1976). Learned helplessness: Theory and evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 105, 3–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.105.1.3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Meyers, L. S., & Wong, D. T. (1988). Validation of a new test of locus of control: The Internal Control Index. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 753–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164488483024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Nes, L. S., & Segerstrom, S. C. (2006). Dispositional optimism and coping: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Nock, M. K., & Mendes, W. B. (2008). Physiological arousal, distress tolerance, and social problem-solving deficits among adolescent self-injurers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.76.1.28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32(3), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Pargament, K. I. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping. Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Pu, J., Hou, H., & Ma, R. (2017). The mediating effects of self-esteem and trait anxiety mediate on the impact of locus of control on subjective well-being. Current Psychology, 36, 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9397-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Rasmussen, H. N., Scheier, M. F., & Greenhouse, J. B. (2009). Optimism and physical health: A meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 37, 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-009-9111-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Rosser, B. A. (2019). Intolerance of uncertainty as a transdiagnostic mechanism of psychological difficulties: A systematic review of evidence pertaining to causality and temporal precedence. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 43, 438–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-018-9964-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will? Journal of Personality, 74, 1557–1585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00420.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ryon, H. S., & Gleason, M. E. (2014). The role of locus of control in daily life. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213507087

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A re-evaluation of the life orientation test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1063–1078. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1063

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (2001). Optimism, pessimism, and psychological well-being. In E. C. Chang (Ed.), Optimism & pessimism: Implications for theory, research, and practice (pp. 189–216). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10385-009

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  55. Scheier, M. F., Weintraub, J. K., & Carver, C. S. (1986). Coping with stress: Divergent strategies of optimists and pessimists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1257–1264. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1257

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Seligman, M. E., & Maier, S. F. (1967). Failure to escape traumatic shock. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024514

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Seybold, K. S., & Hill, P. C. (2001). The role of religion and spirituality in mental and physical health. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 21–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Simons, J. S., & Gaher, R. M. (2005). The distress tolerance scale: Development and validation of a self-report measure. Motivation and Emotion, 29, 83–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-005-7955-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Teodorescu, K., & Erev, I. (2014). Learned helplessness and learned prevalence: Exploring the causal relations among perceived controllability, reward prevalence, and exploration. Association for Psychological Science, 25, 1861–1869. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614543022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9, 79–94. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Zvolensky, M. J., Vujanovic, A. A., Bernstein, A., & Leyro, T. (2010). Distress tolerance: Theory, measurement, and relations to psychopathology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 406–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410388642

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization [AH, ALB, SGH]; Data curation [ALB]; Formal Analysis [ALB]; Funding acquisition [SGH]; Investigation [AH, ALB, SGH]; Methodology [AH, ALB, SGH]; Project administration [AH, ALB]; Resources [SGH]; Software [n/a]; Supervision [SGH, AH]; Validation [AH, ALB, DMM, SGH]; Visualization [AH, ALB]; Writing—original draft [AH, ALB, DMM, SGH]; Writing—review & editing [AH, ALB, DMM, SGH].

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aleena Hay.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Hofmann receives financial support from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (as part of the Humboldt Prize), NIH/NCCIH (R01AT007257), NIH/NIMH (R01MH099021, U01MH108168), and the James S. McDonnell Foundation 21st Century Science Initiative in Understanding Human Cognition – Special Initiative. He receives compensation for his work as editor of Cognitive Therapy and Research from SpringerNature and the Association for Psychological Science, and as an advisor from the Palo Alto Health Sciences, Otsuka Pharmaceuticals, Jazz Pharmaceuticals and for his work as a Subject Matter Expert from John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and SilverCloud Health, Inc. He also receives royalties and payments for his editorial work from various publishers. Dr. Aleena Hay, Ms. Abigail L. Barthel, and Ms. Danielle M. Moskow do not have any interests or activities to report.

Ethical Approval

The data were collected in an ethical manner in accordance with Boston University’s Institutional Review Board and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Boston University’s Internal Review Board reviewed the presented study and the study was granted exemption.

Informed Consent

All participants completed the informed consent process before participating in the research study presented.

Research Involving Human and Animal Participants

No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix

Tolerance of Uncontrollability Questionnaire (TOUQ)

The following statements are rated using the following scale: 1—Strongly disagree, 2- Disagree, 3- Slightly disagree, 4—Neither agree nor disagree, 5—Slightly agree, 6—Agree, 7 -Strongly agree.

Instructions Please rate your agreement with the following statements. There are no right or wrong answers.

  1. 1.

    I am generally okay when I cannot control the outcome of things.

  2. 2.

    I do not have complete control over how life turns out and that’s okay with me.

  3. 3.

    I can’t always control what happens to me and that’s okay.

  4. 4.

    I accept the uncontrollability of life.

  5. 5.

    It’s sometimes important to let go of our attempts to control the uncontrollable.

  6. 6.

    The fact that life is uncontrollable.

  7. 7.

    Life is often difficult to control and I’m okay with that.

  8. 8.

    It’s okay that sometimes things happen outside of my control.

  9. 9.

    Things will happen the way they happen and that’s okay.

  10. 10.

    I usually don't mind when I have to give up control.

  11. 11.

    Not having control over things doesn't bother me too much.

  12. 12.

    Many things in life are outside of my control, and that’s okay.

  13. 13.

    I am generally okay with not having control over what will happen in the future.

  14. 14.

    I can’t always control things in life and that’s okay

  15. 15.

    I am tolerant of uncontrollability.

  16. 16.

    Whatever happens, happens.

  17. 17.

    Some things in life are uncontrollable, and I am okay with that.

  18. 18.

    Nobody is in complete control over one’s life and that’s okay.

  19. 19.

    I am not too bothered when things happen outside of my control.

Scoring: 1pt: strongly disagree; 2pts: disagree; 3pts: slightly disagree; 4pts: neither agree/disagree; 5pts: slightly agree; 6pts: agree; 7pts: strongly agree.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hay, A., Barthel, A.L., Moskow, D.M. et al. Defining and Measuring Tolerance of Uncontrollability. Cogn Ther Res (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-021-10259-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Loss of control
  • Tolerance of uncontrollability
  • Uncontrollability