Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Differences in the Delivery of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression When Therapists Work with Black and White Patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) appears to be an effective treatment for depression, studies of CBT have largely been composed of White patients. Whether the benefits or process of change in CBT differ among ethnic/racial minority patients requires further investigation.

Methods

We drew data from three previous studies to examine differences among Black and White patients. Our combined sample consisted of 229 patients with depression who had participated in CBT (23 Black and 206 White patients). Observer ratings of therapist use of cognitive methods, behavioral methods, and alliance were available for early sessions. Depressive symptoms were assessed at each session.

Results

Patient race was not associated with slope of symptom change or the risk of dropout. There were no differences in therapists’ use of behavioral methods or the alliance. However, CBT therapists used cognitive methods less extensively when working with Black as compared to White patients. Patient race did not moderate the relation between cognitive methods and symptom change.

Conclusions

Taken together, these results raise the possibility that standard CBT can be implemented in ways that are culturally responsive, but also call into question whether some of the recommended ways to personalize CBT enhance outcome. We encourage future research investigating CBT for Black patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The term “Black” in this study refers to individuals who self-identified with worldwide Black or African ancestry.

  2. A total of 24 patients from the total combined dataset were not included in the current sample. Of these patients, 6% (n = 15) were Asian American, 3% (n = 7) were Hispanic, and 1% (n = 2) were Native American.

  3. There were slight differences in the items used across studies. The portion of the sample drawn from DeRubeis and colleagues’ (2005) study (with process ratings reported in Strunk et al., 2010) used homework items that did not differentiate cognitive and behavioral assignments. In the other two samples, items that made this distinction were used and contributed to cognitive and behavioral methods scores, respectively.

  4. In two of the studies, a more detailed explanation was also provided. Dropout was limited to cases in which patients completed fewer than 10 sessions in Adler et al. (2015). Dropout was defined as either informing one’s therapist of the decision to discontinue treatment or being unable to be reached for four weeks in Schmidt et al. (2019).

  5. The main findings are similar to when the BDI covariate is raw (i.e., not limited to a within-patient score).

  6. We examined session 1 process measure scores as predictors of dropout. The direction and significance of results of this model were the same as the model in which we included only patients for whom all early process ratings were available.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Robert J. DeRubeis for his helpful comments on a draft of this paper.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel R. Strunk.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by The Ohio State University’s Institutional Review Board.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 22 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ezawa, I.D., Strunk, D.R. Differences in the Delivery of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression When Therapists Work with Black and White Patients. Cogn Ther Res 46, 104–113 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-021-10254-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-021-10254-0

Keywords

Navigation