Cognitive Bias Modification for Social Anxiety: The Differential Impact of Modifying Attentional and/or Interpretation Bias
Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM) refers to the modification of cognitive biases, such as selectively attending to threatening information or interpreting information in a threatening way. CBM for attention (CBM-A) and interpretation (CBM-I) are efficacious in reducing anxiety vulnerability and anxiety symptoms. However, little research has investigated the potential synergies of these interventions. This study aimed to determine the relative efficacy of CBM-A, CBM-I, and combined CBM for reducing social anxiety symptoms and attenuating anxiety vulnerability in response to a social stressor task. Participants (N = 116) were randomly allocated to receive CBM-A, CBM-I, combined CBM, or placebo. Results revealed that CBM-I reduced negative interpretation bias and social anxiety symptoms. Furthermore, CBM-I improved speech performance on a social stressor task. However, CBM-A procedures did not modify attentional biases or anxiety vulnerability. These findings support the efficacy of CBM-I for social anxiety; however, no evidence for the efficacy of CBM-A was found, nor was the combined cognitive bias hypothesis supported in this study.
KeywordsSocial anxiety Attentional bias Interpretation bias Threat Cognitive bias modification
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Eric S. Yeung and Louise Sharpe declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of The University of Sydney’s Human Research Ethics Committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Research Involving Animal Rights
No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.
- Brosan, L., Hoppitt, L., Shelfer, L., Sillence, A., & Mackintosh, B. (2011). Cognitive bias modification for attention and interpretation reduces trait and state anxiety in anxious patients referred to an out-patient service: Results from a pilot study. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 42(3), 258–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.12.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Clark, D. M., & Wells, A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia. In R. G. Heimberg, M. R. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. R. Schneier (Eds.), Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment (pp. 69–93). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Clarke, P. J. F., Notebaert, L., & MacLeod, C. (2014). Absence of evidence or evidence of absence: Reflecting on therapeutic implementations of attentional bias modification. BMC Psychiatry, 14(8), 1–6.Google Scholar
- Cristea, I. A., Mogoaşe, C., David, D., & Cuijpers, P. (2015). Practitioner review: Cognitive bias modification for mental health problems in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 56(7), 723–734. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hakamata, Y., Lissek, S., Bar-Haim, Y., Britton, J. C., Fox, N. A., Leibenluft, E.,… Pine, D. S. (2010). Attention bias modification treatment: A meta-analysis toward the establishment of novel treatment for anxiety. Biological Psychiatry, 68(11), 982–990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.07.021.
- Henry, J. D., & Crawford, J. R. (2005). The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44(Pt 2), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466505X29657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- MacLeod, C., & Grafton, B. (2016). Anxiety-linked attentional bias and its modification: Illustrating the importance of distinguishing processes and procedures in experimental psychopathology research. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 86, 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.07.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (2012). Cognitive bias modification approaches to anxiety. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8, 189–217. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- MacLeod, C., Rutherford, E., Campbell, L., Ebsworthy, G., & Holker, L. (2002). Selective attention and emotional vulnerability: Assessing the causal basis of their association through the experimental manipulation of attentional bias. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111(1), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-843x.111.1.107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Menne-Lothmann, C., Viechtbauer, W., Hohn, P., Kasanova, Z., Haller, S. P., Drukker, M.,… Lau, J. Y. (2014). How to boost positive interpretations? A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of cognitive bias modification for interpretation. PLoS ONE, 9(6), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100925.
- Naim, R., Kivity, Y., Bar-Haim, Y., & Huppert, J. D. (2018). Attention and interpretation bias modification treatment for social anxiety disorder: A randomized clinical trial of efficacy and synergy. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 59, 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2017.10.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sharpe, L., Ianiello, M., Dear, B. F., Perry, N., Refshauge, K., K., & Nicholas, M. K. (2012). Is there a potential role for attention bias modification in pain patients? Results of 2 randomised, controlled trials. Pain, 153(3), 722–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2011.12.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar