Monocausal Attributions Along Cross-Sections of Psychosis Development and Links with Psychopathology and Data Gathering Style
Several attributional biases have been discussed as putative causal factors in psychosis formation and maintenance. The monocausality bias in particular describes the excessive tendency to disregard multifactorial explanations and to instead attribute events to a single cause. To elucidate the role of monocausality in psychosis development, this study compared patients with an at-risk mental state of psychosis (ARMS, n = 49), first-episode patients (FEP, n = 35), chronic schizophrenia patients (SZ, n = 32) and healthy controls (HC, n = 39) on the Internal Personal and Situational Attributions Questionnaire—Revised. FEP patients made significantly more monocausal attributions than HC to the external-personal locus for positive events. Moreover, monocausality was linked with psychotic as well as depressive symptoms and tentatively also with a hasty data gathering style. Future studies should explore associations with other metacognitive deficits and the potential to prevent or correct the monocausality bias through psychological interventions.
KeywordsAttribution Cognition Metacognition Monocausality Psychosis
We are grateful to all participants and to the staff of the inpatient clinic who helped support our study appointments. M.Z., A.M.-L., and P.K. were funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgesellschaft (DFG, http://www.dfg.de, projects ZI1253/3-1, ZI1253/3-2, KI 576/14-2, ME1591/6-2). S.Ei. was supported by a grant of Heidelberg University (Landesgraduiertenförderungsgesetz), and U.N. by the Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
S.En. has received travel expenses from Lundbeck, Otsuka and Servier and consultant fees from Servier. A.M-L. has received consultant fees from Blueprint Partnership, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daimler und Benz Stiftung, Elsevier, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, ICARE Schizophrenia, K. G. Jebsen Foundation, L.E.K. Consulting, Lundbeck International Foundation (LINF), R. Adamczak, Roche Pharma, Science Foundation, Synapsis Foundation – Alzheimer Research Switzerland, System Analytics, and has received lectures including travel fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Fama Public Relations, Institut d’investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Janssen-Cilag, Klinikum Christophsbad, Göppingen, Lilly Deutschland, Luzerner Psychiatrie, LVR Klinikum Düsseldorf, LWL PsychiatrieVerbund Westfalen-Lippe, Otsuka Pharmaceuticals, Reunions I Ciencia S. L., Spanish Society of Psychiatry, Südwestrundfunk Fernsehen, Stern TV, and Vitos Klinikum Kurhessen. M.Z. has received unrestricted scientific grants from German Research Foundation (DFG), and Servier; further speaker and travel grants were provided by Otsuka, Servier, Lundbeck, Roche, Ferrer and Trommsdorff. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Study approval was obtained from the ethics committee at the Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg (AZ 2009-296N-MA). Informed consent was obtained from all individuals participating in the study.
No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.
- Bechdolf, A., Pukrop, R., Kohn, D., Tschinkel, S., Veith, V., Schultze-Lutter, F., … Klosterkotter, J. (2005). Subjective quality of life in subjects at risk for a first episode of psychosis: A comparison with first episode schizophrenia patients and healthy controls. Schizophrenia Research, 79(1), 137–143.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Diez-Alegria, C., Vazquez, C., Nieto-Moreno, M., Valiente, C., & Fuentenebro, F. (2006). Personalizing and externalizing biases in deluded and depressed patients: Are attributional biases a stable and specific characteristic of delusions? British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45(4), 531–544.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Garety, P., Waller, H., Emsley, R., Jolley, S., Kuipers, E., Bebbington, P., … Freeman, D. (2014). Cognitive mechanisms of change in delusions: An experimental investigation targeting reasoning to effect change in paranoia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 41(2), 400–410.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- IBM Corp. Released 2015. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
- Kay, S., Opler, R., & Fiszbein, A. (1992). The structured clinical interview for positive and negative syndromes of schizophrenia. New York: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
- Lehrl, S. (2005). Manual zum MWT-B. Balingen: Spitta-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Lincoln, T. M., Mehl, S., Exner, C., Lindenmeyer, J., & Rief, W. (2010). Attributional style and persecutory delusions. Evidence for an event independent and state specific external-personal attribution bias for social situations. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 34(3), 297–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mehl, S., Landsberg, M. W., Schmidt, A. C., Cabanis, M., Bechdolf, A., Herrlich, J., … Wagner, M. (2014). Why do bad things happen to me? Attributional style, depressed mood, and persecutory delusions in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 40(6), 1338–1346.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Mehl, S., Rief, W., Lullmann, E., Ziegler, M., Muller, M. J., & Lincoln, T. M. (2010). Implicit attributional style revisited: Evidence for a state-specific “self-decreasing” implicit attributional style in patients with persecutory delusions. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 15(5), 451–476.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mezulis, A. H., Abramson, L. Y., Hyde, J. S., & Hankin, B. L. (2004). Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 711–747.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nowak, U., Eisenacher, S., Braun, H., Rausch, F., Muszinski, S., Thiem, J., Becker, A., Englisch, S., Kirsch, P., Meyer-Lindenberg, A., & Zink, M. (under review). Attributional style is influenced by mood and cognitive resources in clinical samples of psychosis development.Google Scholar
- Rausch, F., Eisenacher, S., Elkin, H., Englisch, S., Kayser, S., Striepens, N., … Gaebel, W. (2016). Evaluation of the ‘Jumping to conclusions’ bias in different subgroups of the at-risk mental state: From cognitive basic symptoms to UHR criteria. Psychological Medicine, 46(10), 2071–2081.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ruhrmann, S., Schultze-Lutter, F., Salokangas, R. K., Heinimaa, M., Linszen, D., Dingemans, P., … Heinz, A. (2010). Prediction of psychosis in adolescents and young adults at high risk: Results from the prospective European prediction of psychosis study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67(3), 241–251.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Saß, H., Wittchen, H., & Zaudig, M. (2000). Diagnostisches und statistisches Manual psychischer Störungen DSM-IV. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
- Sheehan, D. V., Lecrubier, Y., Sheehan, K. H., Amorim, P., Janavs, J., Weiller, E., … Dunbar, G. C. (1998). The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI): The development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 59(20), 22 33.Google Scholar
- Waller, H., Emsley, R., Freeman, D., Bebbington, P., Dunn, G., Fowler, D., … Garety, P. (2015). Thinking Well: A randomised controlled feasibility study of a new CBT therapy targeting reasoning biases in people with distressing persecutory delusional beliefs. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 48, 82–89.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Yung, A., Phillips, L., McGorry, P., Ward, J., Donovan, K., & Thompson, K. (2002). Comprehensive assessment of at risk mental states (CAARMS). Melbourne: University of Melbourne, Department of Psychiatry, Personal Assessment and Crisis Evaluation Clinic.Google Scholar